Class is in session

And you have a pretty narrow definition of what a rifle designed entirely for killing multiple humans is so I guess we are even.
No I don't have a narrow view, I do have a Constitutional right to firearms any that would be suitable to militia use.

You say that but you know it is not entirely accurate. The government has every right to ban weapon types, accessories and modifications on public safety grounds.
Lewis and Miller state otherwise.
 
Those "Black powder & ball muskets" were probably amongst the deadliest handheld firearms of that time. Right?

a musket ball is about the size of a quarter image that entering an arm. It's not going to make a little small hole it's going to some major damage..

I suppose that is true, and a rifleman might get a hit how often? And, how many balls could he put in the air in one minute. Three?

Dead is dead the number doesn't matter.
 
Dude, I know all that and more, I take exception to your professorial tone on the subject. Why should you care about terminology when we cannot even teach you the actual meaning of "communism" or "socialism"? Start using those words correctly and I might think about not calling your large capacity, combat style weapon an assault rifle as you wish.

Why is it you fail to understand that there are many variations of communism, virtually every communist country has done it differently, but you only want to push a definition that fits your narrow narrative, so you can sleep at night while supporting a variation. I guess it's OK if it helps you sleep.

I fail to understand because you are dead wrong.

So your saying there are no determinable differences between the communist systems in N. Korea, China, Cuba and the former Soviet Union? Really?
 
Number 4 is incorrect.

The military uses assault weapons. Not one of those firearms function only as a semi automatic weapon. The assault weapon can be switch to an automatic weapon, a semi automatic cannot.

Nope. That fucker in Connecticut used assault weapons. Your definition is too limited. Pay attention to the forthcoming legislation.

A limited definition, damn, where have I heard those before. Wait a minute, I'll think of it.
 
Why is it you fail to understand that there are many variations of communism, virtually every communist country has done it differently, but you only want to push a definition that fits your narrow narrative, so you can sleep at night while supporting a variation. I guess it's OK if it helps you sleep.

I fail to understand because you are dead wrong.

So your saying there are no determinable differences between the communist systems in N. Korea, China, Cuba and the former Soviet Union? Really?

Not saying that, no one disputes that they were at least somewhat communist in a terribly authoritarian way, the dispute comes when one of you boobs points at the ACA and says "communism".
 
The military uses assault weapons. Not one of those firearms function only as a semi automatic weapon. The assault weapon can be switch to an automatic weapon, a semi automatic cannot.

Nope. That fucker in Connecticut used assault weapons. Your definition is too limited. Pay attention to the forthcoming legislation.

A limited definition, damn, where have I heard those before. Wait a minute, I'll think of it.

Check you out....smart enough to know better.
 

Forum List

Back
Top