City Council votes to remove Statue because of "submissive" pose of Sacagawea

Will Sacagawea was a slave. She was a slave that they bought from an Indian tribe. she had been captured from her own tribe and was being used as a slave by the tribe they found.

There is also evidence that both Lewis and Clark and their men had been a raping her on a regular basis.

this is one of those situations where I don't really care about the Statue being taken down kind of like statues of Columbus, who was nothing but a slave trader and rapist and murderer.

Actually, she was the wife of the French Guide Toussaint Charbonneau

Now, if we wanted to do an accurate statue, it would be Sacawagea being hard core, travelling across the plains and mountains while carrying a baby with her, while Lewis and Clark were whining like a couple of entitled white bitches.

Actually all three had more balls then you ever had.

Why are you so self hating?
 
So what? The people who live there want a different statue or something else there. Get over it
Exactly. They used due process to make a change to a statue. And the white wing wannabe victims are triggered and whining. So who are the crybabies, here?

Calling people a bunch of wussie commie assholes isn't crybaby, it's calling them out.

Kind of like calling you out for being a pee while sitting down fem-boi cuck.
 

Forum List

Back
Top