Christopher Hitchens died today he will be missed but his works will live on
In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949
In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One of the Very Best of Human Kind..........RESPECT Christopher,RESPECT.theliqChristopher Hitchens died today he will be missed but his works will live on
In Memoriam: Christopher Hitchens, 1949
Christopher was a Brilliant Jurno and Writer on so many subjects......he died far too young...RIP Chris...steveThe Faith of Christopher
A touching memoir of Hitchâs last crusade.
May 18, 2016
David Horowitz
...
Taunton is an unusually sensitive man and an unusually honest and diligent writer, points that need emphasis because the God debate has aroused such ideological passions that even this circumspectly observed memoir has been dragged into the maelstrom to its detriment. âOf all that can transpire in a bedroom,â begins the New York Times review of Tauntonâs book, ânothing can be as titillating to the religious, or those of us who write about them, as a dying manâs conversion. Oscar Wildeâs deathbed baptism remains a coup for the Roman Catholic Church 116 years later, and an embarrassment for those who cherish his legacy of hedonismâŚ.The latest controversy about a late-in-life religious turn involves Christopher Hitchens, one of the worldâs most prominent atheists. Unsurprisingly, evangelicals have celebrated the book, while some of Mr. Hitchensâs secular friends have winced.â
One of those secular friends cited by the Times is the Marxist editor and literary agent, Steve Wasserman, who is also an executor of Hitchensâs estate. Wasserman, who had not even read the book when interviewed, described Tauntonâs work as âa shabby businessâ in which âunverifiable conversationsâ are made to âcontradict everything Christopher Hitchens ever said or stood for.â This is shameless invention to grind an ideological ax â nothing could be further from the truth. Along with the Timesâs innuendos Wassermanâs statement performs a great disservice not only to this remarkable little book, but to fans of Hitchens who might be discouraged from reading it.
The author of The Faith of Christopher Hitchens never for a moment believed that Hitchens, whom he affectionately refers to as âChristopher,â converted. He wanted Christopher to convert because he loved him as a friend and because as a Christian he believed that if Christopher did not convert he would be lost forever and the two of them could never be reunited. But he never once concludes that Christopher did convert. This is the way Taunton ends his book: âFor me, the debates, the late-night discussions, and the Bible studies conducted in the front seat of my car were never about winning or losing an argument. Let the bloggers and the people in online forums fight that out ⌠I didnât need Christopherâs conversion to feel good about myself or to reinforce a flagging faith in the claims of Jesus Christ. I have never doubted them. No, for me it was always about the struggle for his soul because I believe this verse: âI am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live.ââ
The rich rewards readers of Tauntonâs memoir will reap are an affectionate portrait of a remarkable man at the end of his life, drawn by a religious adversary with an open heart; an informed examination of Christopherâs relationships with his conservative father and liberal mother, and with his atheist-turned-Christian and radical-turned-conservative brother, Peter, along with thoughtful reflections on the way they each influenced Christopher and illuminate his complexities. Finally it is a testament of one manâs religious creed, and his view that grace is the core belief of a Christian faith. Each and all of these elements serve to make Tauntonâs book a literary gem, which no honest reader could mistake for an ideological tract.
The Faith of Christopher
Outstanding Post "American" and Thank You..steveThe Faith of Christopher
A touching memoir of Hitchâs last crusade.
May 18, 2016
David Horowitz
...
Taunton is an unusually sensitive man and an unusually honest and diligent writer, points that need emphasis because the God debate has aroused such ideological passions that even this circumspectly observed memoir has been dragged into the maelstrom to its detriment. âOf all that can transpire in a bedroom,â begins the New York Times review of Tauntonâs book, ânothing can be as titillating to the religious, or those of us who write about them, as a dying manâs conversion. Oscar Wildeâs deathbed baptism remains a coup for the Roman Catholic Church 116 years later, and an embarrassment for those who cherish his legacy of hedonismâŚ.The latest controversy about a late-in-life religious turn involves Christopher Hitchens, one of the worldâs most prominent atheists. Unsurprisingly, evangelicals have celebrated the book, while some of Mr. Hitchensâs secular friends have winced.â
One of those secular friends cited by the Times is the Marxist editor and literary agent, Steve Wasserman, who is also an executor of Hitchensâs estate. Wasserman, who had not even read the book when interviewed, described Tauntonâs work as âa shabby businessâ in which âunverifiable conversationsâ are made to âcontradict everything Christopher Hitchens ever said or stood for.â This is shameless invention to grind an ideological ax â nothing could be further from the truth. Along with the Timesâs innuendos Wassermanâs statement performs a great disservice not only to this remarkable little book, but to fans of Hitchens who might be discouraged from reading it.
The author of The Faith of Christopher Hitchens never for a moment believed that Hitchens, whom he affectionately refers to as âChristopher,â converted. He wanted Christopher to convert because he loved him as a friend and because as a Christian he believed that if Christopher did not convert he would be lost forever and the two of them could never be reunited. But he never once concludes that Christopher did convert. This is the way Taunton ends his book: âFor me, the debates, the late-night discussions, and the Bible studies conducted in the front seat of my car were never about winning or losing an argument. Let the bloggers and the people in online forums fight that out ⌠I didnât need Christopherâs conversion to feel good about myself or to reinforce a flagging faith in the claims of Jesus Christ. I have never doubted them. No, for me it was always about the struggle for his soul because I believe this verse: âI am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live.ââ
The rich rewards readers of Tauntonâs memoir will reap are an affectionate portrait of a remarkable man at the end of his life, drawn by a religious adversary with an open heart; an informed examination of Christopherâs relationships with his conservative father and liberal mother, and with his atheist-turned-Christian and radical-turned-conservative brother, Peter, along with thoughtful reflections on the way they each influenced Christopher and illuminate his complexities. Finally it is a testament of one manâs religious creed, and his view that grace is the core belief of a Christian faith. Each and all of these elements serve to make Tauntonâs book a literary gem, which no honest reader could mistake for an ideological tract.
The Faith of Christopher
He was forthright,unbias and could savage Bull Shit ArtistsDon't understand Hitchen's popularity honestly other than him being controversial.