Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
The article stated that his qualifications were outstanding. The only problem was a paper he wrote? He was passed over clearly based on his religion.Actually, if you want to take his side on this, it's up to you (really him) to show that it was merely a bias against Christians.
I'd wager they have plenty of Christians working at UK so good luck with that.
You're welcome to speculate all you want.
But it's not really going to help him win his nonexistent case.
Isn't that what you are doing when you assume they had cause to question his objectivity?