Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
it's the Substance right there on the Cover that is FAR MORE Offensive:
How Do You Solve A Problem Like Sarah?
She's Bad News For The GOP - And For Everybody Else, Too
^How in the FUCK is Newsweak Supposed to be Taken Seriously?...
it's the Substance right there on the Cover that is FAR MORE Offensive:
How Do You Solve A Problem Like Sarah?
She's Bad News For The GOP - And For Everybody Else, Too
^How in the FUCK is Newsweak Supposed to be Taken Seriously?...
Settle down Beavis, it's an opinion piece.
I never realized you were offended by others expressing their opinions.
As far as being taken seriously, I guess it's up to the individual how much stock they want to place in this one writer's opinion. Seems like in your case that's very little, as is your right.
PS: I don't want to hear you complain anymore about others starting Palin threads.
For Clarification...
I could give a SHIT about the what would be Called a Blatantly Sexist Cover of Sarah by Newsweak if it were the Weekly Standard doing to to a Liberal Woman, it's the Substance right there on the Cover that is FAR MORE Offensive:
How Do You Solve A Problem Like Sarah?
She's Bad News For The GOP - And For Everybody Else, Too
^How in the FUCK is Newsweak Supposed to be Taken Seriously?...
peace...
You're right. Instead they have 24 hours of streaming footage.
They don't have covers because they aren't a magazine. That being said, Fox has ran stuff that's are a lot worse. I give you exhibits A & B:
The righty's in here said those were just simple mistakes. Not done on purpose.
So you can't Find an Example of the Newsweak Headline in FOXNews Form?...
Noted.
Anyone else?
peace...
^For the Love of God already...
Wanna tell us just how Objective a "Free Press" outlet you are as you Hide behind the Press Clause of the 1st Amendment?...
I Wonder if in the Story they Accuse her of Flushing Qurans down the Toilet?...
Douchebags.
peace...
It's hard to take a supposedly NEW'S magazine seriously when they do things like this. The good news the more they do this the more Ameican women get po'd the more they vote for the person who is being attacked. We love under dogs and will demonstrate that it at the voting booths.Even the liberal ladies at the View are upset about the choice of Newsweek for the cover of their magazine, it's an insult and it's meant to denigrate all women from all parties, and that's the way they are taking it.
^For the Love of God already...
Wanna tell us just how Objective a "Free Press" outlet you are as you Hide behind the Press Clause of the 1st Amendment?...
I Wonder if in the Story they Accuse her of Flushing Qurans down the Toilet?...
Douchebags.
peace...
It's hard to take a supposedly NEW'S magazine seriously when they do things like this. The good news the more they do this the more Ameican women get po'd the more they vote for the person who is being attacked. We love under dogs and will demonstrate that it at the voting booths.
Except that Newsweek has never really been a news publication. It's news analysis, which is a totally different animal.
It's hard to take a supposedly NEW'S magazine seriously when they do things like this. The good news the more they do this the more Ameican women get po'd the more they vote for the person who is being attacked. We love under dogs and will demonstrate that it at the voting booths.
Except that Newsweek has never really been a news publication. It's news analysis, which is a totally different animal.
Don't we have a Conversation elsewhere that you Conveniently Walked from?...
peace...
Except that Newsweek has never really been a news publication. It's news analysis, which is a totally different animal.
Don't we have a Conversation elsewhere that you Conveniently Walked from?...
peace...
Negative. We had one you stormed off all butt-hurt from.
Don't we have a Conversation elsewhere that you Conveniently Walked from?...
peace...
Negative. We had one you stormed off all butt-hurt from.
Really?... I Stormed off?...
Got Link, Twinkle-toes?...
peace...
She said she isn't running.In this picture she looks just like the P.E. teacher I had in high school in the sixties. Now: Mrs. Wotton, lower right in the photo, who was married to one of the coaches, Mr Wotton, LOL and when I can find an old school picture....
found it! Same hairstyle, and so on.....
I just think they shouldn't have airbrushed Sarah (her left armpit to waist) as it makes her look off... and as for the photo, for forty+, what the hell is she complaining about!
The Complaint has to do with Context.
It's a Pic for a Running Mag used by a Leftist Rag to Degrade her as a Potential Candidate.
It's the FUCK out of Context and they would do that to one of their DemocRAT Candidates.
Couple the Running Mag Pic with the Headlines on the Cover and THAT'S the Complaint.
peace...
She quit as gov.
She deserves no one's respect at this point. The picture they used is her most recent.
Tissue?
Oh yes, now I really believe that because I am sure she was promoting a running magazine at the same time she was campaigning for Vice President. They must have not taken any other pictures of her while she was on the campaign trail, somehow they missed that opportunity. ROTHLMAO It's just a mystery to me, how any of us know what Palin looks like, because the only and most recent picture of her is from a cover of a running magazine. LOLOLOLOLOL
Negative. We had one you stormed off all butt-hurt from.
Really?... I Stormed off?...
Got Link, Twinkle-toes?...
peace...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1728172-post14.html
You "gave" me the last word because you're ignorant of customs.
Really?... I Stormed off?...
Got Link, Twinkle-toes?...
peace...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1728172-post14.html
You "gave" me the last word because you're ignorant of customs.
I'm not Sure that was the "Debate" I was Talking about... That's the Derailment you were Attempting by Using that Cartoon as the Vehicle.
Let me Look.
peace...
Yeah Blast. Funny how that all works.
Some news organization assigned 7, yes 7 of their people to pick through her book to validate what she had written.
When Obamas masterpeice was released no one in that organization seemed remotely interested in validated what he had written.
Kinda funny how that ol double standard works doncha know?
Gee. For someone you say is throwing McCain under the bus she sure spoke highly of the Senator last night on O'Reilly's show. She did some complaining about the folks running the campaign but had nothing but nice thing to say about McCain.
As for lying How about Obama who sat in his Church for 20 years but never "heard" any of the bs that the good Rev Wright was throwing???
As for throwing folks under the bus, Obama is pretty good at that also. Rev Wright and Van Jones are a few casualties of that politically expediant bus. I'm sure there are and will be many more.
