Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No comparison to Benghazi whatsoever. Battle situations are always dynamic and sometimes troops get cutoff and overwhelmed. Benghazi was a CIVILIAN compound intentionally left unguarded by Obama and Hillary after months of repeated requests to provide security and protection. The attack itself lasted 11 hours. "STAND DOWN. Obama out".US soldiers killed in Niger were outgunned, 'left behind' in hunt for ISIS leader
Leaders of U.S. soldiers killed in Niger filed misleading mission plan
‘I Cry Every Day’: Families of Soldiers Killed in Niger in 2017 Are Still Waiting for Answers
Republicans had 17 investigations into Benghazi. We know the ambassador refused to leave and that’s probably why his people were in danger.
But I want to know why Trump and the Republicans sent American soldiers out to die for no apparent reason in Nigeria. You can’t blame that on an ambassador.
How come Republicans refuse to start an investigation on that? Is it because it’s something Trump did and it’s not something they could blame on Hillary?
You lying con tool, you've been shown before how the information streaming in was fluid and changing. You can't lie your way out of this...She did not attempt to cover it up. You're lying again, ya lying con tool.There were protests all over the world on that day over the video, and the only terrorist captured in Benghazi said he was there because of the video. "Bad judgement?" That's why you've spent years losing your shit?! It's over! Get over it! You were manipulated because it was easy, the GOP scored its political points, and they could not care any less anymore. Tomorrow, she will be honored at the Clinton Presidential Center for her lifetime of public service. And Benghazi will still not matter.Displaying incredibly bad judgement isn't a high crime...nor is it treasonous! Clinton's decisions regarding the security of State Department personnel in Benghazi and the decision to try and cover up what happened there by painting it as a protest over a You Tube video that turned violent aren't illegal either...just incredibly sleazy!
Seriously? You're seriously still trying to claim that the Benghazi attack was because of a protest that turned violent? You're embarrassing yourself in this string, Black Flag!
Benghazi will ALWAYS matter...because her attempts to cover up for her lack of good judgement ultimately were what led to her secret servers being discovered and how she was using them to get around Congressional scrutiny. Ask Hillary if Benghazi "matters"! She knows too well that it DID matter because it's ultimately what brought her down!
Oh, bullshit! Blaming the attack on a You Tube video protest that turned violent when they knew within hours that wasn't what happened is a BLATANT cover up! Sending Susan Rice out to all those Sunday morning news shows to spread that lie was also a blatant cover up. Meeting those caskets coming home from Libya and telling the families of those killed that you'd hold the makers of the video that caused the deaths responsible is not only a despicable lie...but is also a blatant cover up!
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Lying con tool, stop lying. I showed you the report from the Republican-led investigation which concluded information coming in was changing, which is why Hillary gave two different stories that night. It also shows the CIA thought it was a protest over that video for 2 weeks. Meaning you're lying about Susan Rice "blatantly" lying on Sunday morning news shows; when in fact, she was merely repeating the findings from the CIA.You lying con tool, you've been shown before how the information streaming in was fluid and changing. You can't lie your way out of this...She did not attempt to cover it up. You're lying again, ya lying con tool.There were protests all over the world on that day over the video, and the only terrorist captured in Benghazi said he was there because of the video. "Bad judgement?" That's why you've spent years losing your shit?! It's over! Get over it! You were manipulated because it was easy, the GOP scored its political points, and they could not care any less anymore. Tomorrow, she will be honored at the Clinton Presidential Center for her lifetime of public service. And Benghazi will still not matter.
Seriously? You're seriously still trying to claim that the Benghazi attack was because of a protest that turned violent? You're embarrassing yourself in this string, Black Flag!
Benghazi will ALWAYS matter...because her attempts to cover up for her lack of good judgement ultimately were what led to her secret servers being discovered and how she was using them to get around Congressional scrutiny. Ask Hillary if Benghazi "matters"! She knows too well that it DID matter because it's ultimately what brought her down!
Oh, bullshit! Blaming the attack on a You Tube video protest that turned violent when they knew within hours that wasn't what happened is a BLATANT cover up! Sending Susan Rice out to all those Sunday morning news shows to spread that lie was also a blatant cover up. Meeting those caskets coming home from Libya and telling the families of those killed that you'd hold the makers of the video that caused the deaths responsible is not only a despicable lie...but is also a blatant cover up!
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
How does an attack "evolve" out of protests when there were no protests? The Obama White House knew there was no protest that night in Benghazi LONG before the CIA changed it's initial assessment! You want proof that they knew? Hillary Clinton sent an email to her daughter Chelsea that night in which she stated that the attack was carried out by an al-Qaida-like group.
The truth is that the Obama White House seized on a badly written CIA assessment which conflated a protest in Cairo with one in Benghazi and totally ignored other assessments that showed quite clearly that it was an organized attack carried out by well armed terrorists!
Lying con tool, stop lying. I showed you the report from the Republican-led investigation which concluded information coming in was changing, which is why Hillary gave two different stories that night. It also shows the CIA thought it was a protest over that video for 2 weeks. Meaning you're lying about Susan Rice "blatantly" lying on Sunday morning news shows; when in fact, she was merely repeating the findings from the CIA.You lying con tool, you've been shown before how the information streaming in was fluid and changing. You can't lie your way out of this...She did not attempt to cover it up. You're lying again, ya lying con tool.Seriously? You're seriously still trying to claim that the Benghazi attack was because of a protest that turned violent? You're embarrassing yourself in this string, Black Flag!
Benghazi will ALWAYS matter...because her attempts to cover up for her lack of good judgement ultimately were what led to her secret servers being discovered and how she was using them to get around Congressional scrutiny. Ask Hillary if Benghazi "matters"! She knows too well that it DID matter because it's ultimately what brought her down!
Oh, bullshit! Blaming the attack on a You Tube video protest that turned violent when they knew within hours that wasn't what happened is a BLATANT cover up! Sending Susan Rice out to all those Sunday morning news shows to spread that lie was also a blatant cover up. Meeting those caskets coming home from Libya and telling the families of those killed that you'd hold the makers of the video that caused the deaths responsible is not only a despicable lie...but is also a blatant cover up!
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
How does an attack "evolve" out of protests when there were no protests? The Obama White House knew there was no protest that night in Benghazi LONG before the CIA changed it's initial assessment! You want proof that they knew? Hillary Clinton sent an email to her daughter Chelsea that night in which she stated that the attack was carried out by an al-Qaida-like group.
The truth is that the Obama White House seized on a badly written CIA assessment which conflated a protest in Cairo with one in Benghazi and totally ignored other assessments that showed quite clearly that it was an organized attack carried out by well armed terrorists!
Do you ever stop lying?
Ever???
Sadly, you just can't stop lying. No wonder you're such a trump fan.Lying con tool, stop lying. I showed you the report from the Republican-led investigation which concluded information coming in was changing, which is why Hillary gave two different stories that night. It also shows the CIA thought it was a protest over that video for 2 weeks. Meaning you're lying about Susan Rice "blatantly" lying on Sunday morning news shows; when in fact, she was merely repeating the findings from the CIA.You lying con tool, you've been shown before how the information streaming in was fluid and changing. You can't lie your way out of this...She did not attempt to cover it up. You're lying again, ya lying con tool.
Oh, bullshit! Blaming the attack on a You Tube video protest that turned violent when they knew within hours that wasn't what happened is a BLATANT cover up! Sending Susan Rice out to all those Sunday morning news shows to spread that lie was also a blatant cover up. Meeting those caskets coming home from Libya and telling the families of those killed that you'd hold the makers of the video that caused the deaths responsible is not only a despicable lie...but is also a blatant cover up!
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
How does an attack "evolve" out of protests when there were no protests? The Obama White House knew there was no protest that night in Benghazi LONG before the CIA changed it's initial assessment! You want proof that they knew? Hillary Clinton sent an email to her daughter Chelsea that night in which she stated that the attack was carried out by an al-Qaida-like group.
The truth is that the Obama White House seized on a badly written CIA assessment which conflated a protest in Cairo with one in Benghazi and totally ignored other assessments that showed quite clearly that it was an organized attack carried out by well armed terrorists!
Do you ever stop lying?
Ever???
Here's the thing, Faun...there were differing views of what happened that day in Benghazi! The Obama White House deliberately chose the one that made them look less like total fuck ups who completely dropped the ball on security for our State Department personnel and ignored the rest! Hillary Clinton knew it was an al-Qaida-like group that night as was proven by the email that she sent to her daughter! She also indicated it was a planned attack by an al-Qaida-like group when she was communicating with the President of Libya the next day. The whole "protest gone wild" narrative that they were putting out was total bullshit and they knew it! Both her and Obama knew it when they consoled the families of those men killed...promising that they would go after the man who made the You Tube video! Who does that? Who lies to the faces of the family who just lost their loved ones?
Sadly, you just can't stop lying. No wonder you're such a trump fan.Lying con tool, stop lying. I showed you the report from the Republican-led investigation which concluded information coming in was changing, which is why Hillary gave two different stories that night. It also shows the CIA thought it was a protest over that video for 2 weeks. Meaning you're lying about Susan Rice "blatantly" lying on Sunday morning news shows; when in fact, she was merely repeating the findings from the CIA.You lying con tool, you've been shown before how the information streaming in was fluid and changing. You can't lie your way out of this...Oh, bullshit! Blaming the attack on a You Tube video protest that turned violent when they knew within hours that wasn't what happened is a BLATANT cover up! Sending Susan Rice out to all those Sunday morning news shows to spread that lie was also a blatant cover up. Meeting those caskets coming home from Libya and telling the families of those killed that you'd hold the makers of the video that caused the deaths responsible is not only a despicable lie...but is also a blatant cover up!
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
How does an attack "evolve" out of protests when there were no protests? The Obama White House knew there was no protest that night in Benghazi LONG before the CIA changed it's initial assessment! You want proof that they knew? Hillary Clinton sent an email to her daughter Chelsea that night in which she stated that the attack was carried out by an al-Qaida-like group.
The truth is that the Obama White House seized on a badly written CIA assessment which conflated a protest in Cairo with one in Benghazi and totally ignored other assessments that showed quite clearly that it was an organized attack carried out by well armed terrorists!
Do you ever stop lying?
Ever???
Here's the thing, Faun...there were differing views of what happened that day in Benghazi! The Obama White House deliberately chose the one that made them look less like total fuck ups who completely dropped the ball on security for our State Department personnel and ignored the rest! Hillary Clinton knew it was an al-Qaida-like group that night as was proven by the email that she sent to her daughter! She also indicated it was a planned attack by an al-Qaida-like group when she was communicating with the President of Libya the next day. The whole "protest gone wild" narrative that they were putting out was total bullshit and they knew it! Both her and Obama knew it when they consoled the families of those men killed...promising that they would go after the man who made the You Tube video! Who does that? Who lies to the faces of the family who just lost their loved ones?
No, ya lying con tool, the report by the Republican-led investigation found none of that. While you are spouting lies, they found the information streaming in was changing; which is why she first emailed Chelsea it was an attack and then later told the PM it was a protest.
Do you ever stop lying, ya lyin' con tool?
Ever???
LOLOLSadly, you just can't stop lying. No wonder you're such a trump fan.Lying con tool, stop lying. I showed you the report from the Republican-led investigation which concluded information coming in was changing, which is why Hillary gave two different stories that night. It also shows the CIA thought it was a protest over that video for 2 weeks. Meaning you're lying about Susan Rice "blatantly" lying on Sunday morning news shows; when in fact, she was merely repeating the findings from the CIA.You lying con tool, you've been shown before how the information streaming in was fluid and changing. You can't lie your way out of this...
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180201092703if_/https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
How does an attack "evolve" out of protests when there were no protests? The Obama White House knew there was no protest that night in Benghazi LONG before the CIA changed it's initial assessment! You want proof that they knew? Hillary Clinton sent an email to her daughter Chelsea that night in which she stated that the attack was carried out by an al-Qaida-like group.
The truth is that the Obama White House seized on a badly written CIA assessment which conflated a protest in Cairo with one in Benghazi and totally ignored other assessments that showed quite clearly that it was an organized attack carried out by well armed terrorists!
Do you ever stop lying?
Ever???
Here's the thing, Faun...there were differing views of what happened that day in Benghazi! The Obama White House deliberately chose the one that made them look less like total fuck ups who completely dropped the ball on security for our State Department personnel and ignored the rest! Hillary Clinton knew it was an al-Qaida-like group that night as was proven by the email that she sent to her daughter! She also indicated it was a planned attack by an al-Qaida-like group when she was communicating with the President of Libya the next day. The whole "protest gone wild" narrative that they were putting out was total bullshit and they knew it! Both her and Obama knew it when they consoled the families of those men killed...promising that they would go after the man who made the You Tube video! Who does that? Who lies to the faces of the family who just lost their loved ones?
No, ya lying con tool, the report by the Republican-led investigation found none of that. While you are spouting lies, they found the information streaming in was changing; which is why she first emailed Chelsea it was an attack and then later told the PM it was a protest.
Do you ever stop lying, ya lyin' con tool?
Ever???
Oh, so now you're claiming that they at first thought it was an attack...then they thought it was a protest...and then they thought it was an attack again? Is that REALLY what you're going with, Faun? (eye roll)
The truth is that they knew from the first day that it wasn't a protest. They simply went with that because it made Clinton look less of an incompetent leader of the State Department! They knew they were sending out Susan Rice to lie her ass off that Sunday morning! Ever wonder why it was Rice instead of Clinton herself? Rice didn't know a thing about what happened in Benghazi other than what she'd been told. Why wouldn't the Obama Administration send out the person who knew the most? Because they didn't want those lies to destroy her reputation like they destroyed Susan Rice's?
LOLOLSadly, you just can't stop lying. No wonder you're such a trump fan.Lying con tool, stop lying. I showed you the report from the Republican-led investigation which concluded information coming in was changing, which is why Hillary gave two different stories that night. It also shows the CIA thought it was a protest over that video for 2 weeks. Meaning you're lying about Susan Rice "blatantly" lying on Sunday morning news shows; when in fact, she was merely repeating the findings from the CIA.How does an attack "evolve" out of protests when there were no protests? The Obama White House knew there was no protest that night in Benghazi LONG before the CIA changed it's initial assessment! You want proof that they knew? Hillary Clinton sent an email to her daughter Chelsea that night in which she stated that the attack was carried out by an al-Qaida-like group.
The truth is that the Obama White House seized on a badly written CIA assessment which conflated a protest in Cairo with one in Benghazi and totally ignored other assessments that showed quite clearly that it was an organized attack carried out by well armed terrorists!
Do you ever stop lying?
Ever???
Here's the thing, Faun...there were differing views of what happened that day in Benghazi! The Obama White House deliberately chose the one that made them look less like total fuck ups who completely dropped the ball on security for our State Department personnel and ignored the rest! Hillary Clinton knew it was an al-Qaida-like group that night as was proven by the email that she sent to her daughter! She also indicated it was a planned attack by an al-Qaida-like group when she was communicating with the President of Libya the next day. The whole "protest gone wild" narrative that they were putting out was total bullshit and they knew it! Both her and Obama knew it when they consoled the families of those men killed...promising that they would go after the man who made the You Tube video! Who does that? Who lies to the faces of the family who just lost their loved ones?
No, ya lying con tool, the report by the Republican-led investigation found none of that. While you are spouting lies, they found the information streaming in was changing; which is why she first emailed Chelsea it was an attack and then later told the PM it was a protest.
Do you ever stop lying, ya lyin' con tool?
Ever???
Oh, so now you're claiming that they at first thought it was an attack...then they thought it was a protest...and then they thought it was an attack again? Is that REALLY what you're going with, Faun? (eye roll)
The truth is that they knew from the first day that it wasn't a protest. They simply went with that because it made Clinton look less of an incompetent leader of the State Department! They knew they were sending out Susan Rice to lie her ass off that Sunday morning! Ever wonder why it was Rice instead of Clinton herself? Rice didn't know a thing about what happened in Benghazi other than what she'd been told. Why wouldn't the Obama Administration send out the person who knew the most? Because they didn't want those lies to destroy her reputation like they destroyed Susan Rice's?
It's hysterical how you just can't stop lying, ya lying con tool. In reality, you have nothing but your imagination to back any of that up. Whereas, I have the results of an investigation to back up mine...
There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence.
See that? Intelligence early on was fluid and there were multiple reasons initially. Hillary emailed Chelsea when she first heard it was an attack... and later notified the PM it was a protest.
8 investigations led by Republicans and not one found Hillary lied, not one found Obama lied, not one found Rice lied.
The only liar here is you and you're pathological.
Do you ever stop lying, ya lyin' con tool?
Ever???
LOLOLOLLOLOLSadly, you just can't stop lying. No wonder you're such a trump fan.Lying con tool, stop lying. I showed you the report from the Republican-led investigation which concluded information coming in was changing, which is why Hillary gave two different stories that night. It also shows the CIA thought it was a protest over that video for 2 weeks. Meaning you're lying about Susan Rice "blatantly" lying on Sunday morning news shows; when in fact, she was merely repeating the findings from the CIA.
Do you ever stop lying?
Ever???
Here's the thing, Faun...there were differing views of what happened that day in Benghazi! The Obama White House deliberately chose the one that made them look less like total fuck ups who completely dropped the ball on security for our State Department personnel and ignored the rest! Hillary Clinton knew it was an al-Qaida-like group that night as was proven by the email that she sent to her daughter! She also indicated it was a planned attack by an al-Qaida-like group when she was communicating with the President of Libya the next day. The whole "protest gone wild" narrative that they were putting out was total bullshit and they knew it! Both her and Obama knew it when they consoled the families of those men killed...promising that they would go after the man who made the You Tube video! Who does that? Who lies to the faces of the family who just lost their loved ones?
No, ya lying con tool, the report by the Republican-led investigation found none of that. While you are spouting lies, they found the information streaming in was changing; which is why she first emailed Chelsea it was an attack and then later told the PM it was a protest.
Do you ever stop lying, ya lyin' con tool?
Ever???
Oh, so now you're claiming that they at first thought it was an attack...then they thought it was a protest...and then they thought it was an attack again? Is that REALLY what you're going with, Faun? (eye roll)
The truth is that they knew from the first day that it wasn't a protest. They simply went with that because it made Clinton look less of an incompetent leader of the State Department! They knew they were sending out Susan Rice to lie her ass off that Sunday morning! Ever wonder why it was Rice instead of Clinton herself? Rice didn't know a thing about what happened in Benghazi other than what she'd been told. Why wouldn't the Obama Administration send out the person who knew the most? Because they didn't want those lies to destroy her reputation like they destroyed Susan Rice's?
It's hysterical how you just can't stop lying, ya lying con tool. In reality, you have nothing but your imagination to back any of that up. Whereas, I have the results of an investigation to back up mine...
There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence.
See that? Intelligence early on was fluid and there were multiple reasons initially. Hillary emailed Chelsea when she first heard it was an attack... and later notified the PM it was a protest.
8 investigations led by Republicans and not one found Hillary lied, not one found Obama lied, not one found Rice lied.
The only liar here is you and you're pathological.
Do you ever stop lying, ya lyin' con tool?
Ever???
Oh, bullshit! They used that "contrary intelligence" excuse as the reason why they got it SO wrong for SO long! The truth is that they knew what happened in Benghazi early on but they were scared to death that it would reveal Hillary for who she really is...someone more concerned with "optics" than with keeping the people in her charge safe! So they cooked up the "protest gone bad" narrative and stuck with it for as long as they could!
And you know what, Faun! The choice to do THAT...instead of doing the honorable thing and admitting that you'd screwed up by not giving Stevens the security that he begged for...they chose to turn Benghazi into something that needed to be investigated because it was obvious they HADN'T been forthcoming! That decision led to the discovery of her hidden servers and how she'd been running State completely without Congressional scrutiny so that she could do her "pay for play" scenario with the Clinton Foundation and foreign "donors"!
Hillary's lies are what uncovered the truth about her...and it's why she's not sitting in the Oval Office right now!
