Choose:Global Governance or the Constitution

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by PoliticalChic, Dec 4, 2012.

  1. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,829
    Thanks Received:
    15,670
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +24,991
    1. Since geopolitics has been studied, the central questions have been: Who governs? Who has the authority to make decisions, and why? What of democratic accountability, and government by the consent of the governed? Is there a role for international law?
    Broadly speaking, there are two “parties.”

    a. The party of global governance dreams of supranational political authority that ensures peace and solves global problems.

    b. The party of independent sovereignty favors self-rule, and curbing the power of multinational and supranational empires.




    2. To glimpse the aims and methods of the party of global governance, and the future of world politics, take a look at events of October, 2001. Forty seven American human rights and civil rights activists sent a letter to the UN’s high commission for human rights, demanding that the United States be targeted over “pervasive and persistent patterns of racial discrimination…” They charged that the government has not met its obligations to eliminate discrimination despite its ratification of the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in 1994. The demands included:

    a. Reparations to people of African descent
    b. Admission that statistical disparities between the races is the result of systemic racism in the United States.
    c. Affirmative action
    d. An adequate standard of living is a right, not privilege.
    e. Emphasis on anything other than multilingualism is discriminatory
    f. Admission that free-market capitalism is a flawed system.
    “Sovereignty or Submission,” John Fonte



    3. Any view of the processes involved in implementing these proposals would involve a collision with the American democratic system. Certainly the activists and NGO’s who indicted the United States don’t like the decision-making process within the American democracy, and were resorting to a process outside of the U.S. Constitution.

    4. The actions and interests of the party of global governance illustrates the postconstitutional agenda that will be fought this century.

    a. The government ratified CERD, with reservations removing restrictions on so called hate-speech. The NGO’s and activists bitterly opposed any reservations related to the treaty.

    b. “…human rights groups, 12 of which presented their views here, rejected the report, saying that the government had ignored the pervasiveness of racial discrimination in the United States and that the report had omitted pledges of action to solve remaining problems…. They also asked why Washington had refused to sign the portion of the treaty barring racist speech.”
    U.S. Reports Progress in Fighting Bias - Rights Groups Are Critical - NYTimes.com

    5. The US policies satisfied neither the UN committee nor the NGOs, who would not accept equal treatment for minorities, but, rather, equal results- that is to say, statistical equality among the races in all areas of American society.

    a. Erika George, attorney for Human Rights Watch, said that the United States had “simply reiterated a position which already doesn’t comply with the CERD and which indicates no willingness to comply.”

    b. To be clear, to comply, the United States would have to abandon the free speech guarantees of the Constitution, federalism, and ignore the concept of majority rule.




    6. Global governance is an existential threat to American democracy. It represents one more permutation of the Utopian fantasies of Marx, the former Soviets, the progressives.....and other adolescents.



    Need one wonder what those who are happy to allow someone else to make decisions for them, i.e.. Obama voters, would choose?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,940
    Thanks Received:
    5,212
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,683
    What do you want? Government at a local level that you have a say in or some nameless, faceless and unaccountable bureaucrat in a foreign country telling you how to live?

    And don't be fooled. Global Governance IS the end game for BOTH Political Parties.
     
  3. TNHarley
    Offline

    TNHarley Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    26,728
    Thanks Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +20,723
    WTF is the Constitution? Must be something from a prior generation..
     
  4. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,940
    Thanks Received:
    5,212
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,683
    First attacked in 1816, Finished Off in 1913.
     
  5. TNHarley
    Offline

    TNHarley Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    26,728
    Thanks Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +20,723
    Gotcha! I knew it was not something that was still present today..
     
  6. gallantwarrior
    Offline

    gallantwarrior Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,803
    Thanks Received:
    3,613
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    So far in the boonies, I'm not on google street vi
    Ratings:
    +6,143
    It's amazing how many of the political elite in this country seem to think that they will be permitted some premier role in global governance.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. mudwhistle
    Offline

    mudwhistle Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    65,298
    Thanks Received:
    11,931
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Wetwang With Fimber, Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +26,235
    Get ready for an internet tax.
     
  8. Two Thumbs
    Offline

    Two Thumbs Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    33,450
    Thanks Received:
    5,786
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Where ever I go, there I am.
    Ratings:
    +11,589
    Wanna know how global governance works?

    check the history of the UN

    first idea; Make a group for super powers only
    second idea; create Israel
    3rd idea; let anyone in

    If you can find the "good idea", let me know
     
  9. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,829
    Thanks Received:
    15,670
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +24,991
    I know that was tongue-in-cheek...but you have a point there.

    1. “Theodore Lowi, a political science eminence at Cornell University, years ago drew a bead on what was wrong with the American polity. In his "The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States," he claimed that the Founder's constitution of 1787 had been surreptitiously replaced with a new one by the FDR administration, and no one had actually noticed it for seventy-plus years.

    In current argot, we have been operating under US Constitution, 2.0 since the Roosevelt era. Archived-Articles: America's Third Republic?



    2. Though the Constitution of the Second Republic is unwritten, here is Lowi's "sketch" of its essential outlines
    PREAMBLE. There ought to be a national presence in every aspect of the lives of American citizens. National power is no longer a necessary evil; it is a positive virtue.

    Article I. It is the primary purpose of this national government to provide domestic tranquility by reducing risk. This risk may be physical or it may be fiscal. In order to fulfill this sacred obligation, the national government shall be deemed to have sufficient power to eliminate threats from the environment through regulation, and to eliminate threats from economic uncertainty through insurance.


    You can read the rest at
    Principalities And Powers: Goodbye Liberalism: Hello Socialism
     

Share This Page