Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Doc7505, Aug 29, 2018.
Wait! he gets his information strictly from CREW, Media Matter, etc.
And by 'know he covered', you mean you *imagine* he covered. And ignore the IG that found that political bias didn't affect investigative decisions. Even in Strzok.
You guys sure are prone to mistake imagination for knowledge.
Laughing.......show me ever citing either in this thread. You'll find that once again, you're mistaking your imagination for knowledge.
My sources are the IG report. And the FBI.
Seth Rich sent those emails from the DNC server....according to who?
As our intelligence services have indicated that the DNC was hacked by the Russians. There are literally a dozen indictments of Russian hackers for that the DNC hack. And the server wasn't 'destroyed'. It was handed over the FBI who analyzed it.
Seriously guys? Is this really it? Just you guys citing your imagination over and over and over and ignoring *every* piece of actual evidence?
I ask again, what's the evidence that Hillary's email server was hacked by the Chinese? No rush, folks. I'm in my comfy chair.
Then ask yourself why Strzok was fired.
Laughing.....show us the evidence it was for 'covering for Hillary'.
Or just close your eyes and imagine really, really hard. For conservatives, that seems to be the same thing as evidence.
I see Skyler needs to have last word, let's do the test, he is simply a CLINTON/OBUMA SYCHOPHANT. Show me the evidence you are not!
Always the fucking word games with you. Show me the proof that man was ever on the Moon? Show me the proof that the Earth is more than 2000 years old? Show me the proof that dinosaurs ever existed? The evidence is there, jackass. You know it. A former intelligence officer with expertise in cybersecurity who spoke to The DCNF on condition of anonymity said two members of the ICIG, investigator Frank Rucker and attorney Janette McMillan, met repeatedly with FBI officials to warn them of the Chinese intrusion. He reported it to Rep. Louie Gohmert who reported it to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Obviously you nor I can see that evidence. That makes your argument like Curly Howard saying he cannot see anything because he's shut his eyes tight. Why can't you ever present at least a sensible argument worthy of an 8th grader? Why does the Left always lie or play games if they truly have facts to support their position? We can only take it on faith from the sources whose ultimate source is revealing it under cover for fear of reprisal. So of course you DEMAND to be shown something that YOU KNOW none of us can show because at least right now, it is only leaked confidential information, JUST LIKE ALL THE 4,906 Trump leaks you cannot prove yet take all of them to heart.
Source: Chinese front company hacked Hillary’s server - WND
Unnamed sources to Daily Caller: China hacked Hillary Clinton
You mean other than the eye witneses, the video and the moon rocks they brought back?
Evidence isn't a word game. Its a verifiable, factual grounds for belief. And you've got jack shit.
As demonstrated by your babble about 'moon rocks' when I ask you to show us the evidence that Hillary's server was hacked by the Chinese.
Or that it had any information about 'CIA spies'.
Or that the Chinese killed 'CIA spies' because of the imaginary hack.
You can't. Just admit it.
An unnamed source with no verifiabl evidence of any kind.....contradicted by the FBI affirming that there was no evidence that her server was hacked. And the IG report citing the FBI forensic agent who inspected the server.
Our sources are not equal.
Show me the proof the moon landing wasn't shot in a studio?
Show me the proof those rocks really came from the moon?
Show me the proof that those witnesses actually witnessed anything?
Show me the proof our sources aren't equal?
Show me the proof this isn't a word game?
Show me the proof your mother didn't really type your post while you were off diddling yourself in the bathroom?
Separate names with a comma.