Chinese economy

The world bank estimates that the switch to Republican capitalism in China eliminated 40% of the planets poverty and saved perhaps 60 million from slowly starving to death. How do we thank Republicans for this.
Can you provide the source for this? Where the world bank says anything about the Republican party, or estimates how many millions were saved from starving to death in China?

Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts???????? See why we must be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??
 
Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts???????? See why we must be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??
You're answering a request for the source of your claim about the World Bank said by questioning what someone else thinks, and throwing a general pointless insult at a political ideology. Neither of these responses backs up your source..

Let me ask again, can you provide the source where World Bank says republican capitalism saved 60 million people from starving?
 
Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts???????? See why we must be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??
You're answering a request for the source of your claim about the World Bank said by questioning what someone else thinks, and throwing a general pointless insult at a political ideology. Neither of these responses backs up your source..

Let me ask again, can you provide the source where World Bank says republican capitalism saved 60 million people from starving?

Far more importantly, does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts???????? See why we must be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??
 
Far more importantly, does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts???????? See why we must be positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??
You're still avoiding the question. I didn't ask what was more important to you or your personal opinion on liberalism, your repeated attempts to turn this into a juvenile ideological pissing match don't interest me.

I'll repeat again: you claimed World Bank says republic capitalism saved 60 million people from starving. Can you provide the source of this quote? Hint = yet another round of attacks on liberals isn't a source.
 
You're still avoiding the question..

For 4th time the question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for saving 10's of millions of lives and making China more friend than enemy?
 
For 4th time the question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for saving 10's of millions of lives and making China more friend than enemy?
You're clearly deflecting, since that isn't the question. The question came from me, so I know what it is. I asked for a source for your claim about what the World Bank said, and all you've managed to provide is juvenile nonsensical attacks at liberals and posing additional questions. Go ahead and admit it... you have no source and pulled that information out of your ass. You're now stuck in the poor position of knowing you can't back up your lies, so all you can do is these ridiculous and feeble attempts at deflection.

I'll give you another chance.... MY question = can you provide a source for your claim about World Bank estimations of republican capitalism saving 60 million from starving? If you think backing up your argument means insulting liberals or posing new questions then you are admitting that no, you cannot back it up and you are a liar. Which is it?
 
For 4th time the question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for saving 10's of millions of lives and making China more friend than enemy?
You're clearly deflecting, since that isn't the question. The question came from me, so I know what it is. I asked for a source for your claim about what the World Bank said, and all you've managed to provide is juvenile nonsensical attacks at liberals and posing additional questions. Go ahead and admit it... you have no source and pulled that information out of your ass. You're now stuck in the poor position of knowing you can't back up your lies, so all you can do is these ridiculous and feeble attempts at deflection.

I'll give you another chance.... MY question = can you provide a source for your claim about World Bank estimations of republican capitalism saving 60 million from starving? If you think backing up your argument means insulting liberals or posing new questions then you are admitting that no, you cannot back it up and you are a liar. Which is it?

For 6th time the important question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for saving 10's of millions of lives that would have been lost through en masse starvation and making China more friend than enemy?
 
For 6th time the important question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for saving 10's of millions of lives that would have been lost through en masse starvation and making China more friend than enemy?
So you've basically admitted you lied when you quoted World Bank on Republican capitalism and 60 million deaths. You were given every chance to source or back up your claim but you clearly cannot sustain a debate in this forum without resorting to lying them attempted to deflect when called on it.

The forum notes EdwardBiamonte is a liar, clearly World Bank never made any statement about Republic capitalism saving 60 million from starving. We will continue to view any "fact" he states with skepticism.
 
For 6th time the important question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for saving 10's of millions of lives that would have been lost through en masse starvation and making China more friend than enemy?
So you've basically admitted you lied when you quoted World Bank on Republican capitalism and 60 million deaths. You were given every chance to source or back up your claim but you clearly cannot sustain a debate in this forum without resorting to lying them attempted to deflect when called on it.

The forum notes EdwardBiamonte is a liar, clearly World Bank never made any statement about Republic capitalism saving 60 million from starving. We will continue to view any "fact" he states with skepticism.

For 7th time the important question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for, 1) saving 10's of millions of lives that would have been lost through en masse lib socialist starvation and, 2) making China more friend than enemy?
 
For 7th time the important question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for, 1) saving 10's of millions of lives that would have been lost through en masse lib socialist starvation and, 2) making China more friend than enemy?
My sister used to do this. When she couldn't win an argument she'd cover her ears and repeat the same thing over and over, sometimes resorting to just saying "infinity" then running upstairs.

Note that she was seven years old at the time, and yes we're all laughing at you.
 
For 7th time the important question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for, 1) saving 10's of millions of lives that would have been lost through en masse lib socialist starvation and, 2) making China more friend than enemy?
My sister used to do this. When she couldn't win an argument she'd cover her ears and repeat the same thing over and over, sometimes resorting to just saying "infinity" then running upstairs.

Note that she was seven years old at the time, and yes we're all laughing at you.

For 8th time the important question is: Does the liberal think China got the idea for capitalism from Republicans or the Girl Scouts??? How do we thank Republicans for, 1) saving 10's of millions of lives that would have been lost through en masse lib socialist starvation and, 2) making China more friend than enemy?
 
China is the largest trading nation in the world and plays the most important role in international trade,and has increasingly engaged in trade organizations and treaties in recent years. China became a member of the World Trade Organization in 2001.China also has free trade agreements with several nations, including Australia, South Korea, ASEAN, New Zealand, Switzerland and Pakistan.

Donald Trump’s plan for China relations is to be unpredictable, adviser says

Donald Trump’s game plan for relations with China is to use unpredictability as a means of wrong-footing the country’s Communist party leaders and extracting economic concessions, a prominent adviser has said.

Since his election, Trump and his team have repeatedly discombobulated the Chinese government with a series of interventions on sensitive issues such as the South China Sea, US relations with Taiwan and China’s alleged manipulation of its currency, the yuan.

Those moves have unsettled and angered Beijing, which had expected Trump to tone down his anti-China rhetoric after his victory.
 
China is the largest trading nation in the world and plays the most important role in international trade,and has increasingly engaged in trade organizations and treaties in recent years. China became a member of the World Trade Organization in 2001.China also has free trade agreements with several nations, including Australia, South Korea, ASEAN, New Zealand, Switzerland and Pakistan.

Donald Trump’s plan for China relations is to be unpredictable, adviser says

Donald Trump’s game plan for relations with China is to use unpredictability as a means of wrong-footing the country’s Communist party leaders and extracting economic concessions, a prominent adviser has said.

Since his election, Trump and his team have repeatedly discombobulated the Chinese government with a series of interventions on sensitive issues such as the South China Sea, US relations with Taiwan and China’s alleged manipulation of its currency, the yuan.

Those moves have unsettled and angered Beijing, which had expected Trump to tone down his anti-China rhetoric after his victory.

China uses the Japanese model of industrialization and according to plan it is on the downslope. With a one child policy instead of Japan's two child policy its labor force fraction is crashing faster than Japan's did. Since the Japanese and Chinese both use a 60 years mandatory retirement for men and 55 years for women the magnitude of the collapse is grossly underestimated because of the use of ILO calculations which assumes a 65 year old mandatory retirement age. China should hit its 1993 moment much faster than Japan did and that will be big enough to cause markets to crash worldwide probably before the end of Trump's first term despite the cutouts he is attempting to put in place.
 
China is the largest trading nation in the world and plays the most important role in international trade,and has increasingly engaged in trade organizations and treaties in recent years. China became a member of the World Trade Organization in 2001.China also has free trade agreements with several nations, including Australia, South Korea, ASEAN, New Zealand, Switzerland and Pakistan.

Donald Trump’s plan for China relations is to be unpredictable, adviser says

Donald Trump’s game plan for relations with China is to use unpredictability as a means of wrong-footing the country’s Communist party leaders and extracting economic concessions, a prominent adviser has said.

Since his election, Trump and his team have repeatedly discombobulated the Chinese government with a series of interventions on sensitive issues such as the South China Sea, US relations with Taiwan and China’s alleged manipulation of its currency, the yuan.

Those moves have unsettled and angered Beijing, which had expected Trump to tone down his anti-China rhetoric after his victory.

China uses the Japanese model of industrialization and according to plan it is on the downslope. With a one child policy instead of Japan's two child policy its labor force fraction is crashing faster than Japan's did. Since the Japanese and Chinese both use a 60 years mandatory retirement for men and 55 years for women the magnitude of the collapse is grossly underestimated because of the use of ILO calculations which assumes a 65 year old mandatory retirement age. China should hit its 1993 moment much faster than Japan did and that will be big enough to cause markets to crash worldwide probably before the end of Trump's first term despite the cutouts he is attempting to put in place.




?????



Japan does not have a "two child policy," and China ended its one-child policy.
 
China is the largest trading nation in the world and plays the most important role in international trade,and has increasingly engaged in trade organizations and treaties in recent years. China became a member of the World Trade Organization in 2001.China also has free trade agreements with several nations, including Australia, South Korea, ASEAN, New Zealand, Switzerland and Pakistan.

Donald Trump’s plan for China relations is to be unpredictable, adviser says

Donald Trump’s game plan for relations with China is to use unpredictability as a means of wrong-footing the country’s Communist party leaders and extracting economic concessions, a prominent adviser has said.

Since his election, Trump and his team have repeatedly discombobulated the Chinese government with a series of interventions on sensitive issues such as the South China Sea, US relations with Taiwan and China’s alleged manipulation of its currency, the yuan.

Those moves have unsettled and angered Beijing, which had expected Trump to tone down his anti-China rhetoric after his victory.

China uses the Japanese model of industrialization and according to plan it is on the downslope. With a one child policy instead of Japan's two child policy its labor force fraction is crashing faster than Japan's did. Since the Japanese and Chinese both use a 60 years mandatory retirement for men and 55 years for women the magnitude of the collapse is grossly underestimated because of the use of ILO calculations which assumes a 65 year old mandatory retirement age. China should hit its 1993 moment much faster than Japan did and that will be big enough to cause markets to crash worldwide probably before the end of Trump's first term despite the cutouts he is attempting to put in place.




?????



Japan does not have a "two child policy," and China ended its one-child policy.




Why do people just make shit up like this?
 
Just imagine...

If the free market was in full force throughout the rest of the world, and China was isolated from everyone else when it comes to economic matters. People would actually be paying for what something is worth, like an iPhone for example, and not buying items at subsidized prices because they were manufactured in China while jobs are created here in the U.S.

Suddenly nobody gives a fuck about the Chinese anymore, like it should be.

Just imagine that...
 
Just imagine...

If the free market was in full force throughout the rest of the world, and China was isolated from everyone else when it comes to economic matters. People would actually be paying for what something is worth, like an iPhone for example, and not buying items at subsidized prices because they were manufactured in China while jobs are created here in the U.S.

Suddenly nobody gives a fuck about the Chinese anymore, like it should be.

Just imagine that...
???
 
Just imagine...

If the free market was in full force throughout the rest of the world, and China was isolated from everyone else when it comes to economic matters. People would actually be paying for what something is worth, like an iPhone for example, and not buying items at subsidized prices because they were manufactured in China while jobs are created here in the U.S.

Suddenly nobody gives a fuck about the Chinese anymore, like it should be.

Just imagine that...
???

Imagine if countries produced their own goods and sold them for what their free market told them it would cost. Jobs would be created because corporations wouldn't just want to stop making a profit on their goods. Suddenly the Chinese wouldn't have anything to make anymore and their economy would tank, which by then, nobody would care about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top