Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your Link once again proves you wrong Old Crock, thanks, MIT is a private research university.Really? Perhaps you should stop pulling nonsense out of your ass.Xerox invented the internet with the help of a lot of other people.Government invests in r&d that corporations won't touch because it isn't profitable. Then when government figures it out corporations take over. Didn't the government invent the internet?Matthew supports unregulated pollution.
Nothing destroys the earth more than the reckless manufacture of Government Mandated, Dictated, products, financed by other peoples money.
Thank God our government supports Marxist China.
Brief History of the Internet - Internet Timeline | Internet Society
The first recorded description of the social interactions that could be enabled through networking was a series of memos written by J.C.R. Licklider of MIT in August 1962 discussing his "Galactic Network" concept. He envisioned a globally interconnected set of computers through which everyone could quickly access data and programs from any site. In spirit, the concept was very much like the Internet of today. Licklider was the first head of the computer research program at DARPA,4 starting in October 1962. While at DARPA he convinced his successors at DARPA, Ivan Sutherland, Bob Taylor, and MIT researcher Lawrence G. Roberts, of the importance of this networking concept.
Leonard Kleinrock at MIT published the first paper on packet switching theory in July 1961 and the first book on the subject in 1964. Kleinrock convinced Roberts of the theoretical feasibility of communications using packets rather than circuits, which was a major step along the path towards computer networking. The other key step was to make the computers talk together. To explore this, in 1965 working with Thomas Merrill, Roberts connected the TX-2 computer in Mass. to the Q-32 in California with a low speed dial-up telephone line creating the first (however small) wide-area computer network ever built. The result of this experiment was the realization that the time-shared computers could work well together, running programs and retrieving data as necessary on the remote machine, but that the circuit switched telephone system was totally inadequate for the job. Kleinrock's conviction of the need for packet switching was confirmed.
In late 1966 Roberts went to DARPA to develop the computer network concept and quickly put together his plan for the "ARPANET", publishing it in 1967. At the conference where he presented the paper, there was also a paper on a packet network concept from the UK by Donald Davies and Roger Scantlebury of NPL. Scantlebury told Roberts about the NPL work as well as that of Paul Baran and others at RAND. The RAND group had written a paper on packet switching networks for secure voice in the military in 1964. It happened that the work at MIT (1961-1967), at RAND (1962-1965), and at NPL (1964-1967) had all proceeded in parallel without any of the researchers knowing about the other work. The word "packet" was adopted from the work at NPL and the proposed line speed to be used in the ARPANET design was upgraded from 2.4 kbps to 50 kbps. 5
LiarYour Link once again proves you wrong Old Crock, thanks, MIT is a private research university.Really? Perhaps you should stop pulling nonsense out of your ass.Xerox invented the internet with the help of a lot of other people.Government invests in r&d that corporations won't touch because it isn't profitable. Then when government figures it out corporations take over. Didn't the government invent the internet?Matthew supports unregulated pollution.
Nothing destroys the earth more than the reckless manufacture of Government Mandated, Dictated, products, financed by other peoples money.
Thank God our government supports Marxist China.
Brief History of the Internet - Internet Timeline | Internet Society
The first recorded description of the social interactions that could be enabled through networking was a series of memos written by J.C.R. Licklider of MIT in August 1962 discussing his "Galactic Network" concept. He envisioned a globally interconnected set of computers through which everyone could quickly access data and programs from any site. In spirit, the concept was very much like the Internet of today. Licklider was the first head of the computer research program at DARPA,4 starting in October 1962. While at DARPA he convinced his successors at DARPA, Ivan Sutherland, Bob Taylor, and MIT researcher Lawrence G. Roberts, of the importance of this networking concept.
Leonard Kleinrock at MIT published the first paper on packet switching theory in July 1961 and the first book on the subject in 1964. Kleinrock convinced Roberts of the theoretical feasibility of communications using packets rather than circuits, which was a major step along the path towards computer networking. The other key step was to make the computers talk together. To explore this, in 1965 working with Thomas Merrill, Roberts connected the TX-2 computer in Mass. to the Q-32 in California with a low speed dial-up telephone line creating the first (however small) wide-area computer network ever built. The result of this experiment was the realization that the time-shared computers could work well together, running programs and retrieving data as necessary on the remote machine, but that the circuit switched telephone system was totally inadequate for the job. Kleinrock's conviction of the need for packet switching was confirmed.
In late 1966 Roberts went to DARPA to develop the computer network concept and quickly put together his plan for the "ARPANET", publishing it in 1967. At the conference where he presented the paper, there was also a paper on a packet network concept from the UK by Donald Davies and Roger Scantlebury of NPL. Scantlebury told Roberts about the NPL work as well as that of Paul Baran and others at RAND. The RAND group had written a paper on packet switching networks for secure voice in the military in 1964. It happened that the work at MIT (1961-1967), at RAND (1962-1965), and at NPL (1964-1967) had all proceeded in parallel without any of the researchers knowing about the other work. The word "packet" was adopted from the work at NPL and the proposed line speed to be used in the ARPANET design was upgraded from 2.4 kbps to 50 kbps. 5
No mention of Xerox? Your link leaves much out, Ethernet technology proceeded the TCP/IP protocols, certainly TCP/IP would never of been developed had Ethernet not been developed.
It all goes hand in hand.
Either way Private Research, not the government invented the internet.
It was not Al Gore as you believe.
It is amazing how people project, in this case IcebergSlim makes a Bold Assertion.The fact is Wind Power in China is and always will be less than 1% of the total power produced. Each year from this year on the total Wind Power as percentage will get smaller and smaller.
That is a fact Matthew will never dispute.
Given that it presumes something you cannot know, it satisfies the definition of Bold Assertion...
- Mainland China has 30 nuclear power reactors in operation, 24 under construction, and more about to start construction.
- Additional reactors are planned, including some of the world's most advanced, to give more than a three-fold increase in nuclear capacity to at least 58 GWe by 2020-21, then some 150 GWe by 2030, and much more by 2050.
- The impetus for increasing nuclear power share in China is increasingly due to air pollution from coal-fired plants.
- China’s policy is for closed fuel cycle.
- China has become largely self-sufficient in reactor design and construction, as well as other aspects of the fuel cycle, but is making full use of western technology while adapting and improving it.
- China’s policy is to ‘go global’ with exporting nuclear technology including heavy components in the supply chain.
It is amazing how people project, in this case IcebergSlim makes a Bold Assertion.The fact is Wind Power in China is and always will be less than 1% of the total power produced. Each year from this year on the total Wind Power as percentage will get smaller and smaller.
That is a fact Matthew will never dispute.
Given that it presumes something you cannot know, it satisfies the definition of Bold Assertion...
I make my assertion on the fact that the USA has transferred the technology to build Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear reactors. Currently there are 25 under construction, 75 more awaiting. China will be the World Leader in Nuclear Power.
One of China's milestones was the a year or two ago when they forged their first Reactor Vessel. In the USA we have lost our Heavy Industry and can no longer forge reactor vessels, we can not forge the smaller reactor vessel heads.
It helps to actually work in the Nuclear Industry as I do, being an Electrical Research Power Institute analyst gives me knowledge that you, IcebergSlim, Old Crock, and Matthew can not even imagine.
EPRI | Home
I am not surprised that IcebergSlim took my bait, seriously, Old Crock did not touch that post, Matthew left it alone, but here comes IcebergSlim. There is just nobody here too debate with when discussing energy, at least nobody that disagrees with my position, I do not blame them, it is hard for them to lose every time they thing they found the perfect link.
But maybe IcebergSlim has a surprise and can refute something to redeem him/herself.
China Nuclear Power | Chinese Nuclear Energy - World Nuclear Association
- Mainland China has 30 nuclear power reactors in operation, 24 under construction, and more about to start construction.
- Additional reactors are planned, including some of the world's most advanced, to give more than a three-fold increase in nuclear capacity to at least 58 GWe by 2020-21, then some 150 GWe by 2030, and much more by 2050.
- The impetus for increasing nuclear power share in China is increasingly due to air pollution from coal-fired plants.
- China’s policy is for closed fuel cycle.
- China has become largely self-sufficient in reactor design and construction, as well as other aspects of the fuel cycle, but is making full use of western technology while adapting and improving it.
- China’s policy is to ‘go global’ with exporting nuclear technology including heavy components in the supply chain.
Power Generation Capacity versus Operating with a Capacity?In 2015, China added 30.5 GW of wind power generation capacity[5] to reach a total capacity of 145.1 GW,[6] and generated 186.3 TWh of electricity, representing 3.3% of total national electricity consumption.[7]
Wind power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As of December 2015, the People's Republic of China has 31 nuclear reactors operating with a capacity of 26.7 GW and 21 under construction with a capacity of 21.1 GW.[1][2][3] Additional reactors are planned, providing 58 GWe of capacity by 2020.[4]
Nuclear power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well.....that was fun....
Power Generation Capacity versus Operating with a Capacity?In 2015, China added 30.5 GW of wind power generation capacity[5] to reach a total capacity of 145.1 GW,[6] and generated 186.3 TWh of electricity, representing 3.3% of total national electricity consumption.[7]
Wind power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As of December 2015, the People's Republic of China has 31 nuclear reactors operating with a capacity of 26.7 GW and 21 under construction with a capacity of 21.1 GW.[1][2][3] Additional reactors are planned, providing 58 GWe of capacity by 2020.[4]
Nuclear power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well.....that was fun....
Think there is a difference. Either way, less than 1% of China's electricity comes from Wind, and it will always be that way.
No capacity factors? No reports or data on power delivered to market? Adding Wind Mills means nothing, considering the wind will not blow 80% of the time.
And of course, as we all know, wikipedia is a scientific source of facts, and that all propaganda from Communist China, is actually fact.
Either way, Nuclear Power rules China, Clean, Cheap, and reliable. That is why they are building Nuclear reactors as fast as they can.
Well, a whole lot of flap yap like normal. And, like normal, nothing at all to back up the baseless assertations.Power Generation Capacity versus Operating with a Capacity?In 2015, China added 30.5 GW of wind power generation capacity[5] to reach a total capacity of 145.1 GW,[6] and generated 186.3 TWh of electricity, representing 3.3% of total national electricity consumption.[7]
Wind power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As of December 2015, the People's Republic of China has 31 nuclear reactors operating with a capacity of 26.7 GW and 21 under construction with a capacity of 21.1 GW.[1][2][3] Additional reactors are planned, providing 58 GWe of capacity by 2020.[4]
Nuclear power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well.....that was fun....
Think there is a difference. Either way, less than 1% of China's electricity comes from Wind, and it will always be that way.
No capacity factors? No reports or data on power delivered to market? Adding Wind Mills means nothing, considering the wind will not blow 80% of the time.
50 new nuclear plants being built, a brand new foundry forging reactor vessels, is more than enough to shut down anything Old Crock can come up with.Well, a whole lot of flap yap like normal. And, like normal, nothing at all to back up the baseless assertations.Power Generation Capacity versus Operating with a Capacity?In 2015, China added 30.5 GW of wind power generation capacity[5] to reach a total capacity of 145.1 GW,[6] and generated 186.3 TWh of electricity, representing 3.3% of total national electricity consumption.[7]
Wind power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As of December 2015, the People's Republic of China has 31 nuclear reactors operating with a capacity of 26.7 GW and 21 under construction with a capacity of 21.1 GW.[1][2][3] Additional reactors are planned, providing 58 GWe of capacity by 2020.[4]
Nuclear power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well.....that was fun....
Think there is a difference. Either way, less than 1% of China's electricity comes from Wind, and it will always be that way.
No capacity factors? No reports or data on power delivered to market? Adding Wind Mills means nothing, considering the wind will not blow 80% of the time.
Of course you did not see that coming, everyone can see you are posting beyond your level of intelligence.Power Generation Capacity versus Operating with a Capacity?In 2015, China added 30.5 GW of wind power generation capacity[5] to reach a total capacity of 145.1 GW,[6] and generated 186.3 TWh of electricity, representing 3.3% of total national electricity consumption.[7]
Wind power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As of December 2015, the People's Republic of China has 31 nuclear reactors operating with a capacity of 26.7 GW and 21 under construction with a capacity of 21.1 GW.[1][2][3] Additional reactors are planned, providing 58 GWe of capacity by 2020.[4]
Nuclear power in China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well.....that was fun....
Think there is a difference. Either way, less than 1% of China's electricity comes from Wind, and it will always be that way.
No capacity factors? No reports or data on power delivered to market? Adding Wind Mills means nothing, considering the wind will not blow 80% of the time.
"Blah....blah....blah...."
Didn't see that coming....
