Salt Jones
Rookie
- Mar 22, 2011
- 6,900
- 511
- 0
- Banned
- #41
Big can of worms there.................
While its true many of our courts award custody to the non bread winner for a piece of the pie. It is also true that the system is very soft on irresponsible women. There wont be a solution. The State is vested in the status quo. IE the easiest place to get their cut.....
If they gave custody to the bread winner, there is no need for state services....Thus the underlying problem.......
I agree. I never missed a child support payment in 6 years and started paying before the divorce was final. But, in the final two years of my custody fight the state ordered me to stop paying my ex directly and to start paying into the state's child support system, at a $40 monthly fee. They wanted to make sure I would pay.
Yes..................The fee........ Sadly in many cases the State is more concerned with the FEE then the actual welfare of the children. You have my profound respect Sir. We need more fathers like you..Willing to take on what ever comes our way for the children.....
Now that half of all births here are to single parents...Means...Rough times ahead......
I agree. But, I see it from both sides. I experienced the gender bias in the courts and child support system on the way to getting custody of my kids and I see the struggles single parents, mostly mothers, go through with inadequate child support. Buying diapers or clothes every now and then isn't supporting your kid and the single parent buying stuff to make the kid's life better, even though it seems not to directly affect the kid, is supporting the kid.