Child Killers Celebrated as Heroes by Barbaric Palestinian Animals

[Roudy]

See, this is where you talk just like a terrorist supporting moron. By your standards then everytime any conducts a bombing raid of the enemy city then it is the same. That includes all the bombing raids in World War I and II and all the other wars after. You haven't proven anything other than Israel is guilty of what the US and about 100 countries have done in the past, GOING. TO WAR. Idiot.

Bombing of civilians,Is a War crime, which you agree Israel is guilty of

Bombing of enemy cities, targetting their valuable military and communication facilities has been part of every war the last 80 years. You must have rocks in your head not to understand this simple concept. It is not the same as someone planning and then walking into a pizza restaurant and blowing themselves up massacring all the women and children. As much as you'd like it to be, to justify Muslim savagery and barbarism it isn't. You Islamo terrorist lovers keep repeating this mantra as if anybody is falling for it, other than Islamic or neo nazi morons like yourself.

 

[Jos]

ARTICLE XXII

Aerial bombardment for the purpose of terrorizing the civilian population, of destroying or damaging private property not of military character, or of injuring non-combatants is prohibited.
ARTICLE XXIV

(1) Aerial bombardment is legitimate only when directed at a military objective, that is to say, an object of which the destruction or injury would constitute a distinct military advantage to the belligerent.

(2) Such bombardment is legitimate only when directed exclusively at the following objectives: military forces; military works; military establishments or depots; factories constituting important and well-known centres engaged in the manufacture of arms, ammunition or distinctively military supplies; lines of communication or transportation used for military purposes.

(3) The bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings not in the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces is prohibited. In cases where the objectives specified in paragraph 2 are so situated, that they cannot be bombarded without the indiscriminate bombardment of the civilian population, the aircraft must abstain from bombardment.

(4) In the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces, the bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings is legitimate provided that there exists a reasonable presumption that the military concentration is sufficiently important to justify such bombardment, having regard to the danger thus posed to the civilian population.

(5) A belligerent state is liable to pay compensation for injuries to person or to property caused by violation by any of its officers or forces of the provisions of this article.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

Nuremberg Principles, August 8, 1945

ARTICLE VI

[excerpt]

The following acts, or any of them, are crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for which there shall be individual responsibility:

(a) Crimes against peace: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing;

(b) War Crimes: namely, violations of the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;

(c) Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian populations, before or during the war; or prosecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.

ARTICLE VII

The official position of defendants, whether as Heads of States or responsible officials in Government Departments, shall not be considered as freeing them from responsibility or mitigating punishment.

ARTICLE VIII

The fact that the Defendant acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment if the Tribunal determines that justice so requires.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

 

[Roudy]

ARTICLE XXII

Aerial bombardment for the purpose of terrorizing the civilian population, of destroying or damaging private property not of military character, or of injuring non-combatants is prohibited.
ARTICLE XXIV

(1) Aerial bombardment is legitimate only when directed at a military objective, that is to say, an object of which the destruction or injury would constitute a distinct military advantage to the belligerent.

(2) Such bombardment is legitimate only when directed exclusively at the following objectives: military forces; military works; military establishments or depots; factories constituting important and well-known centres engaged in the manufacture of arms, ammunition or distinctively military supplies; lines of communication or transportation used for military purposes.

(3) The bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings not in the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces is prohibited. In cases where the objectives specified in paragraph 2 are so situated, that they cannot be bombarded without the indiscriminate bombardment of the civilian population, the aircraft must abstain from bombardment.

(4) In the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces, the bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings is legitimate provided that there exists a reasonable presumption that the military concentration is sufficiently important to justify such bombardment, having regard to the danger thus posed to the civilian population.

(5) A belligerent state is liable to pay compensation for injuries to person or to property caused by violation by any of its officers or forces of the provisions of this article.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

Nuremberg Principles, August 8, 1945

ARTICLE VI

[excerpt]

The following acts, or any of them, are crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for which there shall be individual responsibility:

(a) Crimes against peace: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing;

(b) War Crimes: namely, violations of the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;

(c) Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian populations, before or during the war; or prosecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.

ARTICLE VII

The official position of defendants, whether as Heads of States or responsible officials in Government Departments, shall not be considered as freeing them from responsibility or mitigating punishment.

ARTICLE VIII

The fact that the Defendant acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment if the Tribunal determines that justice so requires.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

Which Israel did not do. But That is all Hamas animals and Muslims do. Massacre civilians, including fellow Muslims. Last week the Sunni's massacred about a 100 of your fellow Shiites during worship in the middle of a major Shi'ite religious holiday in Iraq. That doesn't seem to bother you, but Israel going after the same animals that massacre innocents like this, DOES?

Islamists R animals. (no insult to animals)

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Who was Asher Palmer? An illegal extremist settler living unlawfully in Hebron, who died in a car accident that an Apartheid Court held Palestinians were responsible for. We will never know the truth about whether the Palestinians were guilty of any crime with respect to the incident. This man's life illustrates how we reap what we sow. The man had no business living on stolen land in the OPT, he was born in the US. Poor byby, dying for his father's crimes.

 

[Roudy]

Um.....would you like to do some research on the shelling of Beirut in 1982, and re-write this?

What an absolutely staggering claim....

Saigon,

Israel killed 17000, mostly civilians, in Lebanon, in 1982, mostly in air bombings. Robert Fisk writes about this, in detail, in Pity The Nation.

They even bombed a synagogue in Beirut, in Wadi Abu Jamil, I guess Israel desired to ethnically cleanse Lebanon of Jewish civilians, too.

The Jews of Lebanon « Al-Bayt Baytak


Sherri

Indeed. It is a period of Israeli history that I find most Israelis can be honest about - but most of those here who consider themselves pro-Israeli can not.

There's been a few good books on this - David Gilmour's 'Lebanon, Fractured Nation' is also well worth reading.

Eh America went to war in Vietnam, it may have not turned out the right, but the reasons and intentions were. A lot of countries go to war.

 

[Roudy]

Who was Asher Palmer? An illegal extremist settler living unlawfully in Hebron, who died in a car accident that an Apartheid Court held Palestinians were responsible for. We will never know the truth about whether the Palestinians were guilty of any crime with respect to the incident. This man's life illustrates how we reap what we sow. The man had no business living on stolen land in the OPT, he was born in the US. Poor byby, dying for his father's crimes.

Muslims practice apartheid not Israel. Ever heard of Shariah Law, wench?

 

[Jos]

Which Israel did not do. But That is all Hamas animals and Muslims do. Massacre civilians, including fellow Muslims. Last week the Sunni's massacred about a 100 of your fellow Shiites during worship in the middle of a major Shi'ite religious holiday in Iraq. That doesn't seem to bother you, but Israel going after the same animals that massacre innocents like this, DOES?

Islamists R animals. (no insult to animals)

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8VoUkSQz-w]'Under the Bombs' - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Hossfly]

ARTICLE XXII

Aerial bombardment for the purpose of terrorizing the civilian population, of destroying or damaging private property not of military character, or of injuring non-combatants is prohibited.
ARTICLE XXIV

(1) Aerial bombardment is legitimate only when directed at a military objective, that is to say, an object of which the destruction or injury would constitute a distinct military advantage to the belligerent.

(2) Such bombardment is legitimate only when directed exclusively at the following objectives: military forces; military works; military establishments or depots; factories constituting important and well-known centres engaged in the manufacture of arms, ammunition or distinctively military supplies; lines of communication or transportation used for military purposes.

(3) The bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings not in the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces is prohibited. In cases where the objectives specified in paragraph 2 are so situated, that they cannot be bombarded without the indiscriminate bombardment of the civilian population, the aircraft must abstain from bombardment.

(4) In the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces, the bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings is legitimate provided that there exists a reasonable presumption that the military concentration is sufficiently important to justify such bombardment, having regard to the danger thus posed to the civilian population.

(5) A belligerent state is liable to pay compensation for injuries to person or to property caused by violation by any of its officers or forces of the provisions of this article.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

Nuremberg Principles, August 8, 1945

ARTICLE VI

[excerpt]

The following acts, or any of them, are crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for which there shall be individual responsibility:

(a) Crimes against peace: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing;

(b) War Crimes: namely, violations of the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;

(c) Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian populations, before or during the war; or prosecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.

ARTICLE VII

The official position of defendants, whether as Heads of States or responsible officials in Government Departments, shall not be considered as freeing them from responsibility or mitigating punishment.

ARTICLE VIII

The fact that the Defendant acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment if the Tribunal determines that justice so requires.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

During the Vietnam war the NVA shot down fighter plane and bombers . Our planes couldn't strafe or bomb the AA batteries because they were situated atop schools, hospitals, dams, levees and any place that would hold civilians. There were many restrictions the US adhered to at the cost of many lives and POWs. I know the IAF and IDF follow the same guidelines. Don't get me started about the human shields the 'Freedom Fighters' use.

 

[Roudy]

Which Israel did not do. But That is all Hamas animals and Muslims do. Massacre civilians, including fellow Muslims. Last week the Sunni's massacred about a 100 of your fellow Shiites during worship in the middle of a major Shi'ite religious holiday in Iraq. That doesn't seem to bother you, but Israel going after the same animals that massacre innocents like this, DOES?

Islamists R animals. (no insult to animals)

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8VoUkSQz-w]'Under the Bombs' - YouTube[/ame]

Irrelevant. I can show hundreds of clips of cities being bombed by various countries. It will all look pretty much the same. Iran shit missiles at Iraq and Iraq shot missiles at Iran. They were at war. You should know this, as an Iranian Islamist Hezbollahi bacheh koony. Over a million died in both sides. Again why is Israel not allowed to defend itself like all other nations. Because a Jew is fighting Muslim terrorist animals, it suddenly becomes illegal.

 

[Roudy]

ARTICLE XXII

Aerial bombardment for the purpose of terrorizing the civilian population, of destroying or damaging private property not of military character, or of injuring non-combatants is prohibited.
ARTICLE XXIV

(1) Aerial bombardment is legitimate only when directed at a military objective, that is to say, an object of which the destruction or injury would constitute a distinct military advantage to the belligerent.

(2) Such bombardment is legitimate only when directed exclusively at the following objectives: military forces; military works; military establishments or depots; factories constituting important and well-known centres engaged in the manufacture of arms, ammunition or distinctively military supplies; lines of communication or transportation used for military purposes.

(3) The bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings not in the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces is prohibited. In cases where the objectives specified in paragraph 2 are so situated, that they cannot be bombarded without the indiscriminate bombardment of the civilian population, the aircraft must abstain from bombardment.

(4) In the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces, the bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings is legitimate provided that there exists a reasonable presumption that the military concentration is sufficiently important to justify such bombardment, having regard to the danger thus posed to the civilian population.

(5) A belligerent state is liable to pay compensation for injuries to person or to property caused by violation by any of its officers or forces of the provisions of this article.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

Nuremberg Principles, August 8, 1945

ARTICLE VI

[excerpt]

The following acts, or any of them, are crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for which there shall be individual responsibility:

(a) Crimes against peace: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing;

(b) War Crimes: namely, violations of the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;

(c) Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian populations, before or during the war; or prosecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.

ARTICLE VII

The official position of defendants, whether as Heads of States or responsible officials in Government Departments, shall not be considered as freeing them from responsibility or mitigating punishment.

ARTICLE VIII

The fact that the Defendant acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment if the Tribunal determines that justice so requires.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

During the Vietnam war the NVA shot down fighter plane and bombers . Our planes couldn't strafe or bomb the AA batteries because they were situated atop schools, hospitals, dams, levees and any place that would hold civilians. There were many restrictions the US adhered to at the cost of many lives and POWs. I know the IAF and IDF follow the same guidelines. Don't get me started about the human shields the 'Freedom Fighters' use.

They spew lies and garbage all the time that is what they do. Islam encourages lying to the infidel to further the cause of the cult of hate and violence.

 

[Jos]

There are Rules to Warfare, If you decide to ignore those rules don't be surprised If you get charged with War crimes, Why do you think Israeli leaders no Longer visit Europe?

 

[Roudy]

There are Rules to Warfare, If you decide to ignore those rules don't be surprised If you get charged with War crimes, Why do you think Israeli leaders no Longer visit Europe?

If there are rules to warfare then why do you Muslim animals constantly violate them in the worst way? Not to mention they are always top of the list of crimes against humanity and human rights violations. Bacheh koony hezbolahi pig boy.

 

[Roudy]

There are Rules to Warfare, If you decide to ignore those rules don't be surprised If you get charged with War crimes, Why do you think Israeli leaders no Longer visit Europe?

Does this include the sanctions being placed by the same Europe against your beloved Islamist animals in Iran? Heh heh heh. Fork tongued muslim liar.

 

[Hossfly]

There are Rules to Warfare, If you decide to ignore those rules don't be surprised If you get charged with War crimes, Why do you think Israeli leaders no Longer visit Europe?

In reference to Rules of Warfare, what do the Rules say about people firing from mosques, schools, hospitals and all those other 'battle positions?' I'd be interested to read your findings, Ahimsa.

 

[Roudy]

There are Rules to Warfare, If you decide to ignore those rules don't be surprised If you get charged with War crimes, Why do you think Israeli leaders no Longer visit Europe?

In reference to Rules of Warfare, what do the Rules say about people firing from mosques, schools, hospitals and all those other 'battle positions?' I'd be interested to read your findings, Ahimsa.

Don't forget they use ambulances as weapons and terrorist carrying vehicles, and of course using their own women and children as human shields which they have been cited by UN and other human rights agencies many times, for crimes against humanity.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

ARTICLE XXII

Aerial bombardment for the purpose of terrorizing the civilian population, of destroying or damaging private property not of military character, or of injuring non-combatants is prohibited.
ARTICLE XXIV

(1) Aerial bombardment is legitimate only when directed at a military objective, that is to say, an object of which the destruction or injury would constitute a distinct military advantage to the belligerent.

(2) Such bombardment is legitimate only when directed exclusively at the following objectives: military forces; military works; military establishments or depots; factories constituting important and well-known centres engaged in the manufacture of arms, ammunition or distinctively military supplies; lines of communication or transportation used for military purposes.

(3) The bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings not in the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces is prohibited. In cases where the objectives specified in paragraph 2 are so situated, that they cannot be bombarded without the indiscriminate bombardment of the civilian population, the aircraft must abstain from bombardment.

(4) In the immediate neighborhood of the operations of land forces, the bombardment of cities, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings is legitimate provided that there exists a reasonable presumption that the military concentration is sufficiently important to justify such bombardment, having regard to the danger thus posed to the civilian population.

(5) A belligerent state is liable to pay compensation for injuries to person or to property caused by violation by any of its officers or forces of the provisions of this article.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

Nuremberg Principles, August 8, 1945

ARTICLE VI

[excerpt]

The following acts, or any of them, are crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for which there shall be individual responsibility:

(a) Crimes against peace: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing;

(b) War Crimes: namely, violations of the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;

(c) Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian populations, before or during the war; or prosecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.

ARTICLE VII

The official position of defendants, whether as Heads of States or responsible officials in Government Departments, shall not be considered as freeing them from responsibility or mitigating punishment.

ARTICLE VIII

The fact that the Defendant acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment if the Tribunal determines that justice so requires.

International Law - Bombing of Civilians

During the Vietnam war the NVA shot down fighter plane and bombers . Our planes couldn't strafe or bomb the AA batteries because they were situated atop schools, hospitals, dams, levees and any place that would hold civilians. There were many restrictions the US adhered to at the cost of many lives and POWs. I know the IAF and IDF follow the same guidelines. Don't get me started about the human shields the 'Freedom Fighters' use.

The US killed millions of innocent civilians in Vietnam, which was a colossal mistake. It was Seymour Hersch who exposed many of our intentional civilian massacres. It is not any more right when the US does it.

Mai Lai, Vietnam, the Mai Lai Massacre is where the US slaughtered 500 unarmed civilians.

http://pierretristam.com/Bobst/library/wf-200.htm

 

[Jos]

There are Rules to Warfare, If you decide to ignore those rules don't be surprised If you get charged with War crimes, Why do you think Israeli leaders no Longer visit Europe?

In reference to Rules of Warfare, what do the Rules say about people firing from mosques, schools, hospitals and all those other 'battle positions?' I'd be interested to read your findings, Ahimsa.

IF you have ever served, you will of course know the Answer to that as you too would Have read the Geneva convention, supplemented by Your own Rules of engagement

 

[Roudy]

There are Rules to Warfare, If you decide to ignore those rules don't be surprised If you get charged with War crimes, Why do you think Israeli leaders no Longer visit Europe?

In reference to Rules of Warfare, what do the Rules say about people firing from mosques, schools, hospitals and all those other 'battle positions?' I'd be interested to read your findings, Ahimsa.

IF you have ever served, you will of course know the Answer to that as you too would Have read the Geneva convention, supplemented by Your own Rules of engagement

Wow, now IslamoTerrorist lovers are experts on rules of warfare. The same rules Muslims seem to have absolutely no regards for. Checked on how Assad is following those same rules? 12,000 of his fellow civilians have been slaughtered and counting so far. Eh it doesn't count, no Jews involved in that one. Yes, but let's of course talk about those "rule" following Muslims. Especially the Palestinians. Now we know they're really observant of "rules". Ha ha ha!

 

[Hossfly]

There are Rules to Warfare, If you decide to ignore those rules don't be surprised If you get charged with War crimes, Why do you think Israeli leaders no Longer visit Europe?

In reference to Rules of Warfare, what do the Rules say about people firing from mosques, schools, hospitals and all those other 'battle positions?' I'd be interested to read your findings, Ahimsa.

IF you have ever served, you will of course know the Answer to that as you too would Have read the Geneva convention, supplemented by Your own Rules of engagement

Hundreds of hours of classes and training on Geneva Conventions, Code of Conduct and Civil Affairs.Along with 3 years of practical experience during a 20 year stint in the Infantry.I am well versed in the art of warfare.

 

[Jos]

Wow, now IslamoTerrorist lovers are experts on rules of warfare. The same rules Muslims seem to have absolutely no regards for. Checked on how Assad is following those same rules? 12,000 of his fellow civilians have been slaughtered and counting so far. Eh it doesn't count, no Jews involved in that one. Yes, but let's of course talk about those "rule" following Muslims. Especially the Palestinians. Now we know they're really observant of "rules". Ha ha ha!

Yea I read about Syria over in the Forum dedicated to that area, this is however the Israel forum.

depending on the perspective of a state's government, a resistance movement may or may not be labelled a terrorist group based on whether the members of a resistance movement are considered lawful or unlawful combatants and their right to resist occupation is recognized.[5] Ultimately, the distinction is a political judgment.

Resistance movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia