Cherry-picking examples of socialist governments failing does not prove the concept is flawed

Do you like the military? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like FEMA? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like NASA? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like that water coming from your faucet? Socialism built that infrastructure and it's 100% socialism.
Do you like the police department? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like the fire department? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like our first responders? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like our interstate system? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like that electricity when you flip that light switch? Socialism built that infrastructure and if your area didn't privatize it, it's 100% socialism.
Do you like our National Parks? It's 100% socialism.
Not one of those items is government controlling the means of production.

This is another example of the communist/socialist-run education system attempting to normalize communism/socialism by assigning the "socialist" label to any government action.
command economics means spending on Government priorities not private sector priorities.
 
don't like the question and refuse to answer it with a valid rebuttal instead of a diversion due to your, right wing "intelligence"?
You mean by doing EXACTLY what you always do?

Cost cutting and safety issues have nothing to do with minimum wage.

You know that raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour is nothing more than cover for illegal work under the table.
 
don't like the question and refuse to answer it with a valid rebuttal instead of a diversion due to your, right wing "intelligence"?
You mean by doing EXACTLY what you always do?

Cost cutting and safety issues have nothing to do with minimum wage.

You know that raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour is nothing more than cover for illegal work under the table.
just right wing propaganda.

it takes x amount of people to do a job; where are you cutting costs?
 
Do you like the military? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like FEMA? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like NASA? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like that water coming from your faucet? Socialism built that infrastructure and it's 100% socialism.
Do you like the police department? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like the fire department? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like our first responders? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like our interstate system? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like that electricity when you flip that light switch? Socialism built that infrastructure and if your area didn't privatize it, it's 100% socialism.
Do you like our National Parks? It's 100% socialism.


These are all part of a societal construct to provide shared community infrastructure that the individual cannot provide for themselves.

Not socialism,
 
Nothing you type shows that you "understand" economics. The bottom line is this, the ONLY idea the Left EVER has is to take money from person A and give it to person B. That's it, that is the height of their "intellectualism". Billy refused to answer, maybe you will. Why didn't "Socialism" work in Russia?
nothing but right wing propaganda; or does the right wing plan to merely, renege and be renege aids, on the Peoples' debt.

You do know that just because you don't like truth in no way makes it "propaganda", right? Son your level of literacy is sorely lacking.

Billy refused to answer, maybe you will. Why didn't "Socialism" work in Russia?
tax cut economics that don't pay for spending is simple Income Redistribution.

right wing "intelligence", never gets it.

Why did Socialism fail in Russia?
Capitalism "died in 1929" and socialism has been "bailing us out", ever since.

Only right wing, "intelligence", missed the memo.

Keep running Forest. You're dismissed.
 
just right wing propaganda.

it takes x amount of people to do a job; where are you cutting costs?
Y amount of people are looking for jobs (more than x amount of jobs). An employer can pay less when there are too many people looking for the same job.

Why?

Because if you want the job for $10 per hour, and somebody else will do it for $8 per hour, the employer is going to pay less.

Now, if 5 employers are looking for the same person and there is only one person available, somebody is going to pay much more than $10 per hour.

Supply and demand.

Too many illegal Mexicans have destroyed the job market.
 
Do you like the military? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like FEMA? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like NASA? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like that water coming from your faucet? Socialism built that infrastructure and it's 100% socialism.
Do you like the police department? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like the fire department? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like our first responders? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like our interstate system? It's 100% socialism.
Do you like that electricity when you flip that light switch? Socialism built that infrastructure and if your area didn't privatize it, it's 100% socialism.
Do you like our National Parks? It's 100% socialism.


These are all part of a societal construct to provide shared community infrastructure that the individual cannot provide for themselves.

Not socialism,
Yes, it is if it require the Use of the Other Peoples monies.
 
nothing but right wing propaganda; or does the right wing plan to merely, renege and be renege aids, on the Peoples' debt.

You do know that just because you don't like truth in no way makes it "propaganda", right? Son your level of literacy is sorely lacking.

Billy refused to answer, maybe you will. Why didn't "Socialism" work in Russia?
tax cut economics that don't pay for spending is simple Income Redistribution.

right wing "intelligence", never gets it.

Why did Socialism fail in Russia?
Capitalism "died in 1929" and socialism has been "bailing us out", ever since.

Only right wing, "intelligence", missed the memo.

Keep running Forest. You're dismissed.
right wing "intelligence" is just, fake news.

Capitalism "died in 1929" and socialism has been "bailing us out", ever since.
 
just right wing propaganda.

it takes x amount of people to do a job; where are you cutting costs?
Y amount of people are looking for jobs (more than x amount of jobs). An employer can pay less when there are too many people looking for the same job.

Why?

Because if you want the job for $10 per hour, and somebody else will do it for $8 per hour, the employer is going to pay less.

Now, if 5 employers are looking for the same person and there is only one person available, somebody is going to pay much more than $10 per hour.

Supply and demand.

Too many illegal Mexicans have destroyed the job market.
We are discussing One firm within that jurisdiction. Moving the goal posts?

A firm requires x amount of people to do the job properly; where are cost savings coming from?
 

Forum List

Back
Top