- Moderator
- #101
exactly, the MEDIA pushed a lot of shit that was never once claimed by the Bush adminThey all had to say there was no connection when asked directly but there was always a strong implication that there was a connection. When the reasons for the Iraq war and the alleged WMD were discussed, 9/11 was often mentioned as if there was a connection.
I think the media did that work for them. I remember watching Fox and they were pushing the Czech meeting REALLY hard. I am sure other organizations pushed the same story. I think the amount of energy they put into that made the American people believe there was a connection and that Saddam was just as much a threat to the US as bin Laden.
I don't think so. I think the Bush administration represented a whole new era in media manipulation. I wouldn't be surprised if the Obama administration followed suit. Both include/included a number of very media-saavy people.
Look at how carefully select material was "leaked" from the White House while a shitload of other stuff was kept rigidly under lock and key. For one of the most secretive administrations since Nixon - I find that odd.
But a some of the blame lies with the media - for some time they've been an abysmal failure as the Fourth Estate maintaining a check on government excess. They fail to ask tough questions and they've failed check facts and they've allowed themselves to be manipulated by the very people they are supposed to report on instead concentrating on such important issues as the paternity of Anna Nicole's baby....