Cheney is the leak....or not

TheButlerDidIt said:
What about the reports from her neighbors that her employment with the CIA was never a secret?

Can you cite such reports?

And it was the CIA which requested that the DOJ, under John Ashcroft, investigate the matter citing issues of national security and compromised operations as a result of the leak of Ms. Plame's identity.
 
spillmind said:
my prediction:

Rove walks

Cheney walks

DeLay walks

and the republicans remain thrilled these are the people running the country.


Yep. Spillmind is right for once!
 
Supposedly we will see announcements of indictments today. I wait to judge until I have more information.

It seems that I read in many an article that it was common knowledge that the woman worked for the CIA in D.C. If that is true it is very doubtful any meaningful indictments will be brought to bear in this case.
 
spillmind said:
and here i went and respected your intelligence just to watch you contradict yourself. i can't believe you are defending this scum to the bitter end. i'm not a democrat. and i'll be happy watching you squirm when this corrupt filth goes down.

Who have you voted for in the past four elections? Tell us where you sit before you attempt to tell us where you stand.

I'll tell you who I voted for...

1992 - Andre V. Marrou
1996 - Harry Browne
2000 - Harry Browne
2004 - George W. Bush (Vote against Kerry)

By my votes you can tell that I am not a Republican. What can I tell by your votes?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #26
spillmind said:
and here i went and respected your intelligence just to watch you contradict yourself. i can't believe you are defending this scum to the bitter end. i'm not a democrat. and i'll be happy watching you squirm when this corrupt filth goes down.

The only thing that is so scummy about Cheney, Rove, Libby, Delay or any other Republican is they are beating you and your guys at the ballot box.

I have no problem defending any American from baseless charges. In this country men are innocent until proven guilty. Get off your ass and prove it.

Oh and what exactly did I contradict myself about? Got to love the personal attacks with no support.
 
theim said:
Yeah whatever. And after it is proven that no crime is committed and revealing a Langley desk-jockey's name, you'll disappear for a few weeks or a month until the next Dem-manufactured "scandal du jour".

for the life of me, i can't understand how you people can sit there and say that outing a CIA agent under any circumstances for retaliation (which proved to be accurate refutation), is acceptable.

how in the hell are you people ok with defending this?!!!

amazing.
 
no1tovote4 said:
Who have you voted for in the past four elections? Tell us where you sit before you attempt to tell us where you stand.

I'll tell you who I voted for...

1992 - Andre V. Marrou
1996 - Harry Browne
2000 - Harry Browne
2004 - George W. Bush (Vote against Kerry)

By my votes you can tell that I am not a Republican. What can I tell by your votes?

1992- Ross Perot
1996- Ross Perot
2000- Ralph Nader
2004- John Kerry AND NOT BECAUSE I AM DEM BECAUSE I SEE WHAT CORRUPT LYING PEICES OF SH!T THERE ARE RUNNING THIS COUNTRY
 
Avatar4321 said:
Don't you just love misleading news headlines?

Seriously here, the media really needs to wait till they can prove stuff before they make claims like this.

What really is amazing here is that the libs still havent proved that a crime was committed. Looking at the laws, she wasn't a covert operative as defined by the statute. So what the heck is the point of all this?

To ruin the credibility of those allegedly involved by plastering the story in every paper even if they are not found guilty of anything. They still get mileage out of the stories, because some in this country are gullible or hoping upon hope.
 
spillmind said:
1992- Ross Perot
1996- Ross Perot
2000- Ralph Nader
2004- John Kerry AND NOT BECAUSE I AM DEM BECAUSE I SEE WHAT CORRUPT LYING PEICES OF SH!T THERE ARE RUNNING THIS COUNTRY

So your not a democrat... just a socialist
 
spillmind said:
for the life of me, i can't understand how you people can sit there and say that outing a CIA agent under any circumstances for retaliation (which proved to be accurate refutation), is acceptable.

how in the hell are you people ok with defending this?!!!

amazing.

So innocent until proven guilty carries no weight with you then??
 
Avatar4321 said:
The only thing that is so scummy about Cheney, Rove, Libby, Delay or any other Republican is they are beating you and your guys at the ballot box.

I have no problem defending any American from baseless charges. In this country men are innocent until proven guilty. Get off your ass and prove it.

Oh and what exactly did I contradict myself about? Got to love the personal attacks with no support.

your first line is a damn joke. let's see you parrot that in 06 and 08

FACT: saddam DID NOT POSSESS ANY WMD AT THE TIME WE INVADED

FACT: the ones WE supplied he either moved out of the country or destroyed

FACT: wilson was CORRECT about the administration's LIES about the nuclear threat and the uranium from africa:

FACT: in an AMAZING FU¢KING COINCIDENCE, his wife's identity is then made known to the country via the press.

now you sit there and tell me to be a good american by not lying and not committing crimes when it's OBVIOUS to anyone with any COMMON SENSE to see the very people you are defending DID THOSE EXACT THINGS.

i simply cannot believe this is the kind of practice in government you are proud to defend. the hell is wrong with you man? you hate what america used to stand for?!
 
Bonnie said:
So innocent until proven guilty carries no weight with you then??

it's all just some amazing coincidence to you, isn't it, bonnie?

that are you are so blinding by partisan guidelines, you wholly lack the capacity to see things objectively.

or maybe you just think outing CIA operative's identities is totally ok?!
 
spillmind said:
it's all just some amazing coincidence to you, isn't it, bonnie?

that are you are so blinding by partisan guidelines, you wholly lack the capacity to see things objectively.

or maybe you just think outing CIA operative's identities is totally ok?!

Lets look at the facts, first none of us know if there will be indictments, it's all supposition on the part of the salivating press, two we don't know what the charges will even be if there are indictments handed down as Fitzgerald has kept his information close to his vest as HE SHOULD. Third none of us but Fitzgerald knows for sure if Valerie Plame was intentionally leaked, very hard to prove, and fourth none of us knows for sure if she was still undercover when this alleged leak occured and protected under the protection act.

If the investigation goes forth and it is proven that anyone purposefully leaked any CIA operatives identity then yes they are not above the law whomever they happen to be.

Are you so blinded by your politcal ideology that you think someone guilty based on what bits of supposition the press says???
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #36
spillmind said:
your first line is a damn joke. let's see you parrot that in 06 and 08

I'm not laughing. Neither are you. You are supposed to laugh.

FACT: saddam DID NOT POSSESS ANY WMD AT THE TIME WE INVADED

Yeah, he shipped them to Syria during the several years we had to wrestle with the Security council to get them to enforce their own resolutions. What's your point?

FACT: the ones WE supplied he either moved out of the country or destroyed

Which completely undermines your first fact. Either Saddam didn't have weapons or we supplied them. Make up your freaking mind.

FACT: wilson was CORRECT about the administration's LIES about the nuclear threat and the uranium from africa:

BS. Wilson has been proven to have lied about the Uranium in Africa. Intelligence agencies throughout the world have confirmed it. Yellow cake was found in

FACT: in an AMAZING FU¢KING COINCIDENCE, his wife's identity is then made known to the country via the press.

Is it? Why would you think its an amazing coincidence? His wife hadn't been undercover for 6 years at the time she was identified (Note this is outside the definition of a covert operative under the law which only forbids the outing of an agent on a covert assignment within the past 5 years). Not to mention the fact that Wilson was on all the networks trying to claim that the Administration was lying. I mean I know the media has a tendency to not do their job but are you really trying to tell me the media would not have looked into him and his wife and asked how his wife was able to send him to Africa?

now you sit there and tell me to be a good american by not lying and not committing crimes when it's OBVIOUS to anyone with any COMMON SENSE to see the very people you are defending DID THOSE EXACT THINGS.

Okay, then what crime have they committed? Where is your proof? What have they lied about? Do you even have any idea what they have said to the grand jury?

i simply cannot believe this is the kind of practice in government you are proud to defend. the hell is wrong with you man? you hate what america used to stand for?!

I can't believe you are dumb enough to be trying to claim anyone lied or any crime has been committed when you know absolutely nothing about the facts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top