Charlie Hebdo vs Garland Texas the debate no one is having.

[PredFan]

For decades we've been told by the left that over in Europe they don't have guns like we do. They say that the cops don't carry them and they point to lower crime rates, fewer peoe incarcerated etc.

I. France when the Islamists shot up Charle Hebdo, the unarmed french police were sitting ducks, as were the staff of the satirical paper.

In Garland Texas, where not just the cops are armed, it was a quite different story wasn't it?

Without a gun:

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Don't mess with Texas

 

[Luddly Neddite]

No debate to have but that hasn't stopped the nutters from trying to manufacture one.

There is no comparison between the two incidents. Nor is there any comparison between gun deaths in the two countries.

You picked ONE incident from each country and extrapolated an entirely inaccurate scenario.

Try again but use facts next time.

 

[Hossfly]

No debate to have but that hasn't stopped the nutters from trying to manufacture one.

There is no comparison between the two incidents. Nor is there any comparison between gun deaths in the two countries.

You picked ONE incident from each country and extrapolated an entirely inaccurate scenario.

Try again but use facts next time.

 

[PredFan]

No debate to have but that hasn't stopped the nutters from trying to manufacture one.

There is no comparison between the two incidents. Nor is there any comparison between gun deaths in the two countries.

You picked ONE incident from each country and extrapolated an entirely inaccurate scenario.

Try again but use facts next time.

Just because a left wing nut job like you doesn't want to hear it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The two are similar in every single way except in the presence of guns.

Both were attacks by Muslim extremists.
Both were drawing Mohammed in satire.
Both were exercising their right to free speech.

You are lying out of your ass when you say they aren't the same. Typical lying progressive scumbag.

 

[2aguy]

2 shots, 2 hits, 2 kills......someone was helping that officer that day........

Does anyone know if the place was a gun free zone?

 

[2aguy]

No debate to have but that hasn't stopped the nutters from trying to manufacture one.

There is no comparison between the two incidents. Nor is there any comparison between gun deaths in the two countries.

You picked ONE incident from each country and extrapolated an entirely inaccurate scenario.

Try again but use facts next time.

Yeah...I mean 2 heavily armed muslim gunmen out to kill cartoonists for drawing mohemed ....yeah, nothing in common at all......

 

[PredFan]

2 shots, 2 hits, 2 kills......someone was helping that officer that day........

Does anyone know if the place was a gun free zone?

Are there gun free zones in Texas?

 

[PredFan]

No debate to have but that hasn't stopped the nutters from trying to manufacture one.

There is no comparison between the two incidents. Nor is there any comparison between gun deaths in the two countries.

You picked ONE incident from each country and extrapolated an entirely inaccurate scenario.

Try again but use facts next time.

Yeah...I mean 2 heavily armed muslim gunmen out to kill cartoonists for drawing mohemed ....yeah, nothing in common at all......

There is no extreme that left wing nutters will not go to.

Progressives are the lowest form of life on the planet.

 

[PredFan]

When Charlie Hebdo was shot up the left was all "We are Charlie Hebdo". When the Muslims tried and failed to shoot up Garland, the left is all "She was asking for it!"

Progressives are the lowest form of life on this planet.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

No debate to have but that hasn't stopped the nutters from trying to manufacture one.

There is no comparison between the two incidents. Nor is there any comparison between gun deaths in the two countries.

You picked ONE incident from each country and extrapolated an entirely inaccurate scenario.

Try again but use facts next time.

So what isn't factual about it?
12 Dead in france,2 Dead terrorist in Texas.
Whats the matter? You unhappy about the results in Texas?

 

[ClosedCaption]

As long as you ignore the fact that one had security and the other didnt yeah, its the same thing

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

As long as you ignore the fact that one had security and the other didnt yeah, its the same thing

Why didnt Charlie Hebdo have security?
And what good would it have done if they weren't armed?

 

[2aguy]

As long as you ignore the fact that one had security and the other didnt yeah, its the same thing

No.....our police officer, the first one to encounter the muslim terrorists was armed, in France the first officer on the scene was unarmed and murdered.....

 

[ClosedCaption]

As long as you ignore the fact that one had security and the other didnt yeah, its the same thing

No.....our police officer, the first one to encounter the muslim terrorists was armed, in France the first officer on the scene was unarmed and murdered.....

That was also after they killed a bunch of people too! So same thing.

One had the opp to shoot people first, the other met a guard at the door.

Same thing

 

[2aguy]

As long as you ignore the fact that one had security and the other didnt yeah, its the same thing

The French had security in the office...I don't know if he was armed but he was surprised and outgunned by guys intent on killing and willing to die.......

The police immediately at the scene in France....unarmed and killed.....

 

[2aguy]

Texas shows one thing very clearly.....one armed man can resist a number of armed attackers and win......it doesn't happen all the time....but it happens a lot more often when the good guy actually has a gun........

 

[PredFan]

As long as you ignore the fact that one had security and the other didnt yeah, its the same thing

The security was armed, and that is the point nit wit.

 

[Dragonlady]

No debate to have but that hasn't stopped the nutters from trying to manufacture one.

There is no comparison between the two incidents. Nor is there any comparison between gun deaths in the two countries.

You picked ONE incident from each country and extrapolated an entirely inaccurate scenario.

Try again but use facts next time.

Just because a left wing nut job like you doesn't want to hear it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The two are similar in every single way except in the presence of guns.

Both were attacks by Muslim extremists.
Both were drawing Mohammed in satire.
Both were exercising their right to free speech.

You are lying out of your ass when you say they aren't the same. Typical lying progressive scumbag.

They aren't the same. In Texas, the police feared an attack on the "convention" and had SWAT teams at the convention site. The organizers were forced to hire extra security, all armed, as a condition to obtaining a permit to hold the event.

In France, a bunch of magazine writers went to their offices to work. No armed guards, no SWAT teams, no security.

Americans are desperate to prove that guns save lives despite the fact that the U.S. had the highest death by gun rate in the first world.

Arming you population has made the U.S. one of the most dangerous countries in the world despite what the NRA keeps telling you.

 

[2aguy]

No debate to have but that hasn't stopped the nutters from trying to manufacture one.

There is no comparison between the two incidents. Nor is there any comparison between gun deaths in the two countries.

You picked ONE incident from each country and extrapolated an entirely inaccurate scenario.

Try again but use facts next time.

Just because a left wing nut job like you doesn't want to hear it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The two are similar in every single way except in the presence of guns.

Both were attacks by Muslim extremists.
Both were drawing Mohammed in satire.
Both were exercising their right to free speech.

You are lying out of your ass when you say they aren't the same. Typical lying progressive scumbag.

They aren't the same. In Texas, the police feared an attack on the "convention" and had SWAT teams at the convention site. The organizers were forced to hire extra security, all armed, as a condition to obtaining a permit to hold the event.

In France, a bunch of magazine writers went to their offices to work. No armed guards, no SWAT teams, no security.

Americans are desperate to prove that guns save lives despite the fact that the U.S. had the highest death by gun rate in the first world.

Arming you population has made the U.S. one of the most dangerous countries in the world despite what the NRA keeps telling you.

That is not true...we are in the 90s as far as violence goes with countries around the world..........most of the most violent countries...have strict gun control...

Each year Americans use guns to stop or prevent violent criminal attack and save live 2 million times a year on average...that is non military, non police......just private citizens.......and gun murder...only 8,454 in 2013 and that is going down, not up as more people own and carry guns....most of our gun crime is concentrated in small, multi block areas in inner cities, the most violent have been under democrat control for decades...

The rest of the country....as safe as Europe....if not safer....