Change In Attack Direction

If the truth bothers you...feel free not to read it.

We are talking about live born babies here. Out of the womb and alive.


You can try to deflect however you want. Senator Obama lied through his teeth to America.

Dude.. Your posts are impossible to read.. Your signature's half a page long, centered, and your text is centered on top of that in giant print. :(
 
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. funny, factcheck.org says that the BS about Obama is just that... BS. But that's meaningless.

And I, personally, have no issues with someone deciding that THEY would never have an abortion. It's all good. But keep the Christian dogma and the anti-choice propaganda away from me.

Thanks.
geee, you didnt read the factchek that he posted, eh?
 
factcheck is like Wiki it is all slanted to the left. Don't depend on it. Like Obama it will lie to you.
 
Quick, deflect away from Obama's record (what little of it there is).





From Factcheck.org: Obama and 'Infanticide'

August 25, 2008

The facts about Obama's votes against 'Born Alive' bills in Illinois.

Summary

Anti-abortion activists accuse Obama of "supporting infanticide," and the National Right to Life Committee says he's conducted a "four-year effort to cover up his full role in killing legislation to protect born-alive survivors of abortions." Obama says they're "lying."

At issue is Obama's opposition to Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.

Obama opposed the 2001 and 2002 "born alive" bills as backdoor attacks on a woman's legal right to abortion, but he says he would have been "fully in support" of a similar federal bill that President Bush had signed in 2002, because it contained protections for Roe v. Wade.

We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee's 2003 mark-up session....

...Obama campaign statement, June 30: Illinois And Federal Born Alive Infant Protection Acts Did Not Include Exactly The Same Language. The Illinois legislation read, "A live child born as a result of an abortion shall be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate protection under the law." The Born Alive Infant Protections Act read, "Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being 'born alive' as defined in this section." [SB 1082, Held in Health and Human Services, 3/13/03; Session Sine Die, 1/11/05; BAIPA, Public Law 107-207]

The statement was still on Obama's Web site as of this writing, Aug. 25, long after Obama had accused his detractors of "lying." But Obama's claim is wrong. In fact, by the time the HHS Committee voted on the bill, it did contain language identical to the federal act.




There is more to this article at factcheck.org.




Infanticide​
obama.jpg

Maybe this is the reason people are angry at McCain rallies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top