Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The mainstream of both parties are not trying raise the State above the Individual.
They and the mainstream of American society does insist and make happen that the Individual is a part of Society.
Yes, mainstream politics exist, Trump found the seam (give him credit), and the next year the two parties are going to repair that seam and get the hucksters right and left out.The mainstream of both parties are not trying raise the State above the Individual.
They and the mainstream of American society does insist and make happen that the Individual is a part of Society.
There are no mainstream politics in this time.
Yes, mainstream politics exist, Trump found the seam (give him credit), and the next year the two parties are going to repair that seam and get the hucksters right and left out.The mainstream of both parties are not trying raise the State above the Individual.
They and the mainstream of American society does insist and make happen that the Individual is a part of Society.
There are no mainstream politics in this time.
Let's hope she comes back with buttermilk.Yes, mainstream politics exist, Trump found the seam (give him credit), and the next year the two parties are going to repair that seam and get the hucksters right and left out.The mainstream of both parties are not trying raise the State above the Individual.
They and the mainstream of American society does insist and make happen that the Individual is a part of Society.
There are no mainstream politics in this time.
And the cow jumped over the moon.
Breakup? No.
Steady decay into mediocrity? Sure. That's already begun.
Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.
That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,
In what respect is modern Progressivism (odd use of the word for) Progressiveness (BTW, and it is not an ism)?
What and how do progressive people violate the principles of our founders, which by most measures were radical?
Which articles/clauses of COTUS do they seek to overturn/violate?
Which articles/clauses do they interpret wrongly or to their advantage?
Do progressives seek to suppress the vote, suppress the rights of minorities, gay and lesbian citizens and repeal two plus centuries of jurisprudence?
Your initial sentence is a mess.
That said, it is an "ism" in every sense of the word; a totalitarian basis of worship for all those claiming to be American who seek to raise the State above the Individual.
It's all been tried before. You won't win this time either.
As for the rest, I've no time to write you a book. The history is in plain sight, if you merely look beyond what you have been told.
Breakup? No.
Steady decay into mediocrity? Sure. That's already begun.
Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.
That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,
In what respect is modern Progressivism (odd use of the word for) Progressiveness (BTW, and it is not an ism)?
What and how do progressive people violate the principles of our founders, which by most measures were radical?
Which articles/clauses of COTUS do they seek to overturn/violate?
Which articles/clauses do they interpret wrongly or to their advantage?
Do progressives seek to suppress the vote, suppress the rights of minorities, gay and lesbian citizens and repeal two plus centuries of jurisprudence?
Your initial sentence is a mess.
That said, it is an "ism" in every sense of the word; a totalitarian basis of worship for all those claiming to be American who seek to raise the State above the Individual.
It's all been tried before. You won't win this time either.
As for the rest, I've no time to write you a book. The history is in plain sight, if you merely look beyond what you have been told.
I used the word common for the suffix for progressive; you made one up.
But that's not my point, you failed to address my questions, because you can't, won't or became so flummoxed you needed to default to a syntax attack.
What do you think is the root word for progressive?
Do we still require horse, water power or timber solely for power? Do we still bleed the sick in the hope it will make them recover? Do we still make human sacrifices to assure a productive harvest? Do we still use snail mail to communicate, or do we mostly use e-mail? Do we still believe the son revolves around the earth? Do we still believe Trump tells the truth when he says, "believe" me (well some do...do you?)?
Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.
That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,
In what respect is modern Progressivism (odd use of the word for) Progressiveness (BTW, and it is not an ism)?
What and how do progressive people violate the principles of our founders, which by most measures were radical?
Which articles/clauses of COTUS do they seek to overturn/violate?
Which articles/clauses do they interpret wrongly or to their advantage?
Do progressives seek to suppress the vote, suppress the rights of minorities, gay and lesbian citizens and repeal two plus centuries of jurisprudence?
Your initial sentence is a mess.
That said, it is an "ism" in every sense of the word; a totalitarian basis of worship for all those claiming to be American who seek to raise the State above the Individual.
It's all been tried before. You won't win this time either.
As for the rest, I've no time to write you a book. The history is in plain sight, if you merely look beyond what you have been told.
I used the word common for the suffix for progressive; you made one up.
The word "Progressivism" is in common use.
But that's not my point, you failed to address my questions, because you can't, won't or became so flummoxed you needed to default to a syntax attack.
If you'd like me to write you a book, we can discuss contractual terms. I'm expensive.
What do you think is the root word for progressive?
In the case of its use for the current political movement, it is used as a mask.
Do we still require horse, water power or timber solely for power? Do we still bleed the sick in the hope it will make them recover? Do we still make human sacrifices to assure a productive harvest? Do we still use snail mail to communicate, or do we mostly use e-mail? Do we still believe the son revolves around the earth? Do we still believe Trump tells the truth when he says, "believe" me (well some do...do you?)?
No, but some still seek total power over the nation, its citizens, the conducting of their lives and the product of their labors, and that is not progress.
Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.
That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,
In what respect is modern Progressivism (odd use of the word for) Progressiveness (BTW, and it is not an ism)?
What and how do progressive people violate the principles of our founders, which by most measures were radical?
Which articles/clauses of COTUS do they seek to overturn/violate?
Which articles/clauses do they interpret wrongly or to their advantage?
Do progressives seek to suppress the vote, suppress the rights of minorities, gay and lesbian citizens and repeal two plus centuries of jurisprudence?
Your initial sentence is a mess.
That said, it is an "ism" in every sense of the word; a totalitarian basis of worship for all those claiming to be American who seek to raise the State above the Individual.
It's all been tried before. You won't win this time either.
As for the rest, I've no time to write you a book. The history is in plain sight, if you merely look beyond what you have been told.
I used the word common for the suffix for progressive; you made one up.
The word "Progressivism" is in common use.
But that's not my point, you failed to address my questions, because you can't, won't or became so flummoxed you needed to default to a syntax attack.
If you'd like me to write you a book, we can discuss contractual terms. I'm expensive.
What do you think is the root word for progressive?
In the case of its use for the current political movement, it is used as a mask.
Do we still require horse, water power or timber solely for power? Do we still bleed the sick in the hope it will make them recover? Do we still make human sacrifices to assure a productive harvest? Do we still use snail mail to communicate, or do we mostly use e-mail? Do we still believe the son revolves around the earth? Do we still believe Trump tells the truth when he says, "believe" me (well some do...do you?)?
No, but some still seek total power over the nation, its citizens, the conducting of their lives and the product of their labors, and that is not progress.
The mainstream of both parties are not trying raise the State above the Individual.
They and the mainstream of American society does insist and make happen that the Individual is a part of Society.
The mainstream of both parties are not trying raise the State above the Individual.
They and the mainstream of American society does insist and make happen that the Individual is a part of Society.
If Trump is reelected in 2020 the America we know will no longer exist; in fact, the America we knew, has not existed since his very first tweet.
Interesting post MPS777As I’ve watched partisan animosity and hostility only ever increase over the course of my life, I’ve recently started to wonder if it will eventually “break” the USA. I’ve conjured up at least one scenario that I consider entirely plausible. It would start with either Texas or California seceding. If it was the result of a democratic referendum, I think it’s quite likely the rest of the country wouldn’t see fit to forcibly keep the state in the union. However, the loss of either Texas or California would put many other states in severe electoral college disadvantage ideologically. So now given the secession precedent had been set, I think it’s possible that many other states would secede in turn as not to be “lorded over” by an ideologically opposite people.
This is just one possible “breakup” scenario, however I can imagine others might also take place. Based purely on my own gut feeling, I think there’s only about a 50% chance of the United States lasting out the 21st century in its current form. But I’d like to get a broader opinion from others on their views, so I’m putting the question to a poll: What do you think the probability is that the USA will exist in its current form at the dawn of the 22nd century?
Yup, no slaves, no indentured servants, no workers for the manors. Tough.The mainstream of both parties are not trying raise the State above the Individual.
They and the mainstream of American society does insist and make happen that the Individual is a part of Society.
If Trump is reelected in 2020 the America we know will no longer exist; in fact, the America we knew, has not existed since his very first tweet.
That's the idea, because the America you people were building was never the intent of the Founders.
America is currently progressive, that's been the case for decades.Breakup? No.
Steady decay into mediocrity? Sure. That's already begun.
Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.
Which is really just conservatism.That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,
In what respect is modern Progressivism (odd use of the word for) Progressiveness (BTW, and it is not an ism)?
What and how do progressive people violate the principles of our founders, which by most measures were radical?
Which articles/clauses of COTUS do they seek to overturn/violate?
Which articles/clauses do they interpret wrongly or to their advantage?
Do progressives seek to suppress the vote, suppress the rights of minorities, gay and lesbian citizens and repeal two plus centuries of jurisprudence?
Your initial sentence is a mess.
That said, it is an "ism" in every sense of the word; a totalitarian basis of worship for all those claiming to be American who seek to raise the State above the Individual.
It's all been tried before. You won't win this time either.
As for the rest, I've no time to write you a book. The history is in plain sight, if you merely look beyond what you have been told.
I used the word common for the suffix for progressive; you made one up.
The word "Progressivism" is in common use.
But that's not my point, you failed to address my questions, because you can't, won't or became so flummoxed you needed to default to a syntax attack.
If you'd like me to write you a book, we can discuss contractual terms. I'm expensive.
What do you think is the root word for progressive?
In the case of its use for the current political movement, it is used as a mask.
Do we still require horse, water power or timber solely for power? Do we still bleed the sick in the hope it will make them recover? Do we still make human sacrifices to assure a productive harvest? Do we still use snail mail to communicate, or do we mostly use e-mail? Do we still believe the son revolves around the earth? Do we still believe Trump tells the truth when he says, "believe" me (well some do...do you?)?
No, but some still seek total power over the nation, its citizens, the conducting of their lives and the product of their labors, and that is not progress.
"No, but some still seek total power over the nation, its citizens, the conducting of their lives and the product of their labors, and that is not progress"
True, that's called Trumpism.
Do we still require horse, water power or timber solely for power? Do we still bleed the sick in the hope it will make them recover? Do we still make human sacrifices to assure a productive harvest? Do we still use snail mail to communicate, or do we mostly use e-mail? Do we still believe the son revolves around the earth? Do we still believe Trump tells the truth when he says, "believe" me (well some do...do you?)?
