Centralized Credit (FRB), Is About The Communist Manifesto, (QE)!

[mascale]

The main Communist Beneficiary on the stage in the Democratic Las Vegas debate was actually Mayor Bloomberg, and his competitor billionaire Donald Trump, (kind of off-stage). Federal Reserve was created in 1913. Quantitative Easing was first proposed for Japan in 1994, but became famous as the bailout from the Republican Recession of 2008. People do tend to associate it with Keynes. The compare and contrast is with the pre-1913 bank notes. If Bloomberg's bank, or Trump's bank, failed: They were wiped out. Banks stayed open in 2008, v. 1929-32. "Socialist Private Banking" benefits the rich, disproportionately.

Medicare For All is not "Communist Manifeto." Federal Reserve, and QE, are Communist Agenda Number 5.

The Abolition of Private Property aside--into Federal, State, and local government parks and other common uses: The big Communist Eyesore is The United States Federal Reserve Bank. The Marxist agenda is actually widely unknown, in fact. There are ten basic agenda. Number 5 is the most heinous, actually. Others far more benign are in bold letters, too. They are all recognizable, USA.
Manifesto of the Communist Party
________________________________________
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
______________________________

The "Medicare For All" concept is not included. The bank is proposed, but not financial inclusion.

The Nationalist Supremacist, MAGA Trump agenda: Is way more inclusive of Agenda 4.

Agenda 5, the baby-genitalia mutilating embrace of usury economics: Is Nationalist Supremacist supportive to the core. Impose fixed percentage interest rates, then the outcome is clearly shown in Matthew 25: 14-30. "In-House" stay Pharaoh's rich household and like households. "Out-House(?)" goes everyone screwed. The "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth" is even prayed for! "Thy Kingdom Come, Thy will be done. . . ."

So in fact Marxist Agenda is not about solace and comfort: But is as noxious as the Nationalist Supremacist Trump MAGA agenda. That is not about solace and comfort, at its core!

There is alternative arithmetic in play via Matthew 20: 1-16. There is the Child Tax Credit of the former Republican Party--Senator Romney the remaining actual Republican in office. In the Ford Administration, there arose the Child Tax Credit in equal amounts in the Tax Code, and the equal amount tax rebates. The goal was to offset the Usury Economics of the Payroll Tax. The Democrats created the raised and indexed Standard Deduction and Personal Exemptions in the 1986 Tax Reform. Obama created the "Make Work Pay," Refundable equal amount tax credit. Many Now Nationalist Supremacists voted to take that away from America forever, after the first Midterms. Near-Majority Moslem Nigeria now includes, "Traders Moni," equal amounts credit for 2.0 mil. microbusinesses, never before eligible for credit in all of history.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Time was, anyone failed when the private banks failed, taking all the value of their bank notes with them! Now there is "Quantitative Easing(?):" Socialist private banking, FRB guaranteed!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The main Communist Beneficiary on the stage in the Democratic Las Vegas debate was actually Mayor Bloomberg, and his competitor billionaire Donald Trump, (kind of off-stage). Federal Reserve was created in 1913. Quantitative Easing was first proposed for Japan in 1994, but became famous as the bailout from the Republican Recession of 2008. People do tend to associate it with Keynes. The compare and contrast is with the pre-1913 bank notes. If Bloomberg's bank, or Trump's bank, failed: They were wiped out. Banks stayed open in 2008, v. 1929-32. "Socialist Private Banking" benefits the rich, disproportionately.

Medicare For All is not "Communist Manifeto." Federal Reserve, and QE, are Communist Agenda Number 5.

The Abolition of Private Property aside--into Federal, State, and local government parks and other common uses: The big Communist Eyesore is The United States Federal Reserve Bank. The Marxist agenda is actually widely unknown, in fact. There are ten basic agenda. Number 5 is the most heinous, actually. Others far more benign are in bold letters, too. They are all recognizable, USA.
Manifesto of the Communist Party
________________________________________
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
______________________________

The "Medicare For All" concept is not included. The bank is proposed, but not financial inclusion.

The Nationalist Supremacist, MAGA Trump agenda: Is way more inclusive of Agenda 4.

Agenda 5, the baby-genitalia mutilating embrace of usury economics: Is Nationalist Supremacist supportive to the core. Impose fixed percentage interest rates, then the outcome is clearly shown in Matthew 25: 14-30. "In-House" stay Pharaoh's rich household and like households. "Out-House(?)" goes everyone screwed. The "Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth" is even prayed for! "Thy Kingdom Come, Thy will be done. . . ."

So in fact Marxist Agenda is not about solace and comfort: But is as noxious as the Nationalist Supremacist Trump MAGA agenda. That is not about solace and comfort, at its core!

There is alternative arithmetic in play via Matthew 20: 1-16. There is the Child Tax Credit of the former Republican Party--Senator Romney the remaining actual Republican in office. In the Ford Administration, there arose the Child Tax Credit in equal amounts in the Tax Code, and the equal amount tax rebates. The goal was to offset the Usury Economics of the Payroll Tax. The Democrats created the raised and indexed Standard Deduction and Personal Exemptions in the 1986 Tax Reform. Obama created the "Make Work Pay," Refundable equal amount tax credit. Many Now Nationalist Supremacists voted to take that away from America forever, after the first Midterms. Near-Majority Moslem Nigeria now includes, "Traders Moni," equal amounts credit for 2.0 mil. microbusinesses, never before eligible for credit in all of history.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Time was, anyone failed when the private banks failed, taking all the value of their bank notes with them! Now there is "Quantitative Easing(?):" Socialist private banking, FRB guaranteed!)

5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.

Credit isn't centralized in the hands of the state.
The state doesn't have an exclusive monopoly on credit.

Idiot.

 

[mascale]

Languages-challenged Toddsterpatriot v. ". . .by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly." The Fed monopoly even includes the subject problem: Usury rates. The banks are under a kind of surrender-control level status.

How the Federal Reserve Affects You

Widely known:
The United States Federal Reserve Bank influences interest rates by setting certain rates, stipulating bank reserve requirements,

and buying and selling “risk-free” (a term used to indicate that these are among the safest in existence) U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities to affect the deposits that banks hold at the Fed.
_________________________
In the link:

". . .the Fed was set up in 1913. While some wanted the central bank to be a public bank–a bank owned and controlled by the government–the nation’s bankers were concerned about the potential effects of government intervention on their banks. What came out of this disagreement was a compromise: The Fed is part private, part public, partly centralized, partly decentralized. It’s a balance between private banking interests and the government’s economic interests.

Status quo challenged
However, private banks’ role in the Federal Reserve was challenged in 2011 by Congress’ Government Accountability Office. Its audit of the Fed cites numerous conflicts of interest, many around the time of the 2008 Great Recession. For instance, in 2008, Stephen Friedman broke the Fed’s rules: He was the chairman of the New York Fed and he was on the Goldman Sachs board of directors and owned Goldman Sachs stock. Other corporate affiliations with Fed directors in the past have included General Electric, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup, and Lehman Brothers, giving cause for concern. As Senator Bernie Sanders, whose office released the audit, succinctly said, “Not only do they run the banks, they run the institutions that regulate the banks.” The Government Accountability Office’s goal is to restructure the Fed so that those in the banking industry are not in charge of choosing Federal Reserve Bank directors.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23;19-20, of the nemesis Pharaoh, not of any deity!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Languages-challenged Toddsterpatriot v. ". . .by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly." The Fed monopoly even includes the subject problem: Usury rates. The banks are under a kind of surrender-control level status.

How the Federal Reserve Affects You

Widely known:
The United States Federal Reserve Bank influences interest rates by setting certain rates, stipulating bank reserve requirements,

and buying and selling “risk-free” (a term used to indicate that these are among the safest in existence) U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities to affect the deposits that banks hold at the Fed.
_________________________
In the link:

". . .the Fed was set up in 1913. While some wanted the central bank to be a public bank–a bank owned and controlled by the government–the nation’s bankers were concerned about the potential effects of government intervention on their banks. What came out of this disagreement was a compromise: The Fed is part private, part public, partly centralized, partly decentralized. It’s a balance between private banking interests and the government’s economic interests.

Status quo challenged
However, private banks’ role in the Federal Reserve was challenged in 2011 by Congress’ Government Accountability Office. Its audit of the Fed cites numerous conflicts of interest, many around the time of the 2008 Great Recession. For instance, in 2008, Stephen Friedman broke the Fed’s rules: He was the chairman of the New York Fed and he was on the Goldman Sachs board of directors and owned Goldman Sachs stock. Other corporate affiliations with Fed directors in the past have included General Electric, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup, and Lehman Brothers, giving cause for concern. As Senator Bernie Sanders, whose office released the audit, succinctly said, “Not only do they run the banks, they run the institutions that regulate the banks.” The Government Accountability Office’s goal is to restructure the Fed so that those in the banking industry are not in charge of choosing Federal Reserve Bank directors.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23;19-20, of the nemesis Pharaoh, not of any deity!)

You didn't have to post sources that disproved your own claim......but thanks

 

[mascale]

Languages-challenged, Toddsterpatriot, aka, "Way too stupid:" Has no concept of any monopoly at all, shown with the contention that the interest rate monopoly is not one(?).

Even in 1913, the concept, "Central Bank" was not adopted since the implication was that the monopoly would be held by Wall Street Bankers and Banks instead, keeping interest rates high. They could conspire with speculators to cause panics even. Anyone sees the monopoly.

Even then the Democrats understood the concept of the exclusive monopoly being put in place. The regional super-commercial banks held the monopoly, instead, in 1913, after 1912.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred
(Then Moses took on the role of, "Agent of Pharaoh" to assure a continuity of elitist monopoly and domination. See Matt 25: 14-30)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Languages-challenged, Toddsterpatriot, aka, "Way too stupid:" Has no concept of any monopoly at all, shown with the contention that the interest rate monopoly is not one(?).

Even in 1913, the concept, "Central Bank" was not adopted since the implication was that the monopoly would be held by Wall Street Bankers and Banks instead, keeping interest rates high. They could conspire with speculators to cause panics even. Anyone sees the monopoly.

Even then the Democrats understood the concept of the exclusive monopoly being put in place. The regional super-commercial banks held the monopoly, instead, in 1913, after 1912.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred
(Then Moses took on the role of, "Agent of Pharaoh" to assure a continuity of elitist monopoly and domination. See Matt 25: 14-30)

The United States Federal Reserve Bank influences interest rates by setting certain rates,

Influences?
What kind of monopoly only influences?
Oh, right, the imaginary kind.

 

[mascale]

The influence of the monopoly is created, ". . .by setting certain rates(?). . .and other monopoly devices at the Federal Reserve, e.g., "stipulating,""must hold" reserve requirements.

Monopoly and lots of control.

Then Marxist Agenda Central Banks exist in other nations, even worldwide(?).

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Charging anyone foreign all the interest rates: Does become worldwide chaotic!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The influence of the monopoly is created, ". . .by setting certain rates(?). . .and other monopoly devices at the Federal Reserve, e.g., "stipulating,""must hold" reserve requirements.

Monopoly and lots of control.

Then Marxist Agenda Central Banks exist in other nations, even worldwide(?).

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Charging anyone foreign all the interest rates: Does become worldwide chaotic!)

Yup, they set reserve requirements and they influence rates.
Because they don't have a monopoly.

 

[mascale]

The regulated banks don't have the monopoly authority to set the rates of the Fed, (overnight charges to keep the banks open next business day, via the germane monopoly), or to stipulate the reserve requirements, (germane monopoly): To be in business. Banks out of compliance are banks no longer US banks. Most monopolies mainly wish. . . .

The Toddsterpatriot posts are clearly, no longer, even on topic.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(A fix is in: (shown in Mattew 25:14-30!))

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The regulated banks don't have the monopoly authority to set the rates of the Fed, (overnight charges to keep the banks open next business day, via the germane monopoly), or to stipulate the reserve requirements, (germane monopoly): To be in business. Banks out of compliance are banks no longer US banks. Most monopolies mainly wish. . . .

The Toddsterpatriot posts are clearly, no longer, even on topic.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(A fix is in: (shown in Mattew 25:14-30!))

The regulated banks don't have the monopoly authority to set the rates of the Fed,

Right. So what?

The Fed sets the overnight rate, the commercial banks set every other rate.

The Toddsterpatriot posts are clearly, no longer, even on topic.

The topic was your claim that the Fed was the realization of the Communist manifesto.

5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.

Your claim was refuted.
Did you have another topic you'd like me to ridicule?

 

[mascale]

Ridiculous is the claim that the Fed is irrelevant, when posted is that: "The Fed sets the overnight rate. . ."

Toddsterpatriot posts, "The topic was your claim that the Fed was the realization of the Communist Manifesto," and noted is that, "To be in business. Banks out of compliance are banks no longer US banks. Most monopolies mainly wish. . . ."

Matter shown!

Rates Set, Rates Set, Rates Set! Reserves Stipulated, Reserves Stipulated! Reserves Stipulated!

Re-set More, and Reserves Stipulated More: Not by commercial banks! It's underway right now! The Monopoly is widely well-known.

Stock Markets react to the Fed, in fact.
_________________________________

"Mascale: The regulated banks don't have the monopoly authority to set the rates of the Fed."

Toddssterpatriot: "Right."

Then, "So what?" posts Toddsterpatriot(?)! The "So what" is that Toddsterpatriot, clearly a languages-challenged poster: Concedes that the OP contention is spot right on! That is the "What," of the "So What!"

Toddsterpatriot: "The Fed sets the overnight rate, the commercial banks set every other rate." Reality: No commericial bank has the statutory right to set the rates for all the other banks--per USA, and "Communist Manifesto," agenda advocacy. The banks react to the monopoly authority.

Toddsterpatriot contentions do not reflect that Monopoly authority that USA statutes grant the Fed. Toddsterpatriot posts that Mascale is, "Right."

So the banks don't have the authority to set the rates of all the other banks, all having reacted, to the Fed. Banks can react to the rates of all the other banks--having reacted to the Fed, and some in fact so advertise.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Setting Usury is Pharaoh's rule, deity not involved!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ridiculous is the claim that the Fed is irrelevant, when posted is that: "The Fed sets the overnight rate. . ."

Toddsterpatriot posts, "The topic was your claim that the Fed was the realization of the Communist Manifesto," and noted is that, "To be in business. Banks out of compliance are banks no longer US banks. Most monopolies mainly wish. . . ."

Matter shown!

Rates Set, Rates Set, Rates Set! Reserves Stipulated, Reserves Stipulated! Reserves Stipulated!

Re-set More, and Reserves Stipulated More: Not by commercial banks! It's underway right now! The Monopoly is widely well-known.

Stock Markets react to the Fed, in fact.
_________________________________

"Mascale: The regulated banks don't have the monopoly authority to set the rates of the Fed."

Toddssterpatriot: "Right."

Then, "So what?" posts Toddsterpatriot(?)! The "So what" is that Toddsterpatriot, clearly a languages-challenged poster: Concedes that the OP contention is spot right on! That is the "What," of the "So What!"

Toddsterpatriot: "The Fed sets the overnight rate, the commercial banks set every other rate." Reality: No commericial bank has the statutory right to set the rates for all the other banks--per USA, and "Communist Manifesto," agenda advocacy. The banks react to the monopoly authority.

Toddsterpatriot contentions do not reflect that Monopoly authority that USA statutes grant the Fed. Toddsterpatriot posts that Mascale is, "Right."

So the banks don't have the authority to set the rates of all the other banks, all having reacted, to the Fed. Banks can react to the rates of all the other banks--having reacted to the Fed, and some in fact so advertise.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Setting Usury is Pharaoh's rule, deity not involved!)

Ridiculous is the claim that the Fed is irrelevant,

Who said that? Where? Link?

Concedes that the OP contention is spot right on!

LOL!

Your contention was that the government run bank has a monopoly on lending.
Not even in the same solar-system as "The Fed sets the overnight lending rate"

So the banks don't have the authority to set the rates of all the other banks,

You're talking about (non-government) banks not setting the rates for other (non-government) banks.
As part of your proof that government banks have a monopoly. DUDE!

 

[mascale]

Absolute distortion! Non-Government banks do not set rates for other non-government banks since the Fed has the monopoly of the funds rate-setting. That is "Right." The compare and contrast is shown. The non-government banks do not have the Fed monopoly authority.

The Fed monopoly influences behavior. Any monopoly influences behavior. "To be in business, banks out of compliance are banks no longer. Most monopolies mainly wish they dictated behavior like that."

Any further linking is unnecessary,

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Tyranny of interest rates even used by Moses as some nature of deity, (Deut 23:19-20))

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Absolute distortion! Non-Government banks do not set rates for other non-government banks since the Fed has the monopoly of the funds rate-setting. That is "Right." The compare and contrast is shown. The non-government banks do not have the Fed monopoly authority.

The Fed monopoly influences behavior. Any monopoly influences behavior. "To be in business, banks out of compliance are banks no longer. Most monopolies mainly wish they dictated behavior like that."

Any further linking is unnecessary,

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Tyranny of interest rates even used by Moses as some nature of deity, (Deut 23:19-20))

Non-Government banks do not set rates for other non-government banks since the Fed has the monopoly of the funds rate-setting.

Hey, moron, Citigroup sets the rates for Citigroup. Chase sets the rates for Chase.
Bank of America sets the rates for Bank of America.
The Fed doesn't set the credit card rates, the HELOC rates or the mortgages rates for any of those banks.
Or the savings account, checking account or CD rates.
The government isn't the only lender. The government doesn't have a monopoly.

The Fed monopoly influences behavior.​

Yup, the Fed control of the overnight rate influences behavior, it doesn't control behavior.
​

Any further linking is unnecessary,​

And in your case, imaginary.​

 

[mascale]

Languages challenged Toddsterpatriot fails at credit and economics, more or less completely!. Banks not Fed compliant have no rates to offer whatsoever! Out of business they are.

Anyone sees the control.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Pharaoh's regulation through the Moses Atrocity--Deut 23:19-20--persists!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Languages challenged Toddsterpatriot fails at credit and economics, more or less completely!. Banks not Fed compliant have no rates to offer whatsoever! Out of business they are.

Anyone sees the control.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Pharaoh's regulation through the Moses Atrocity--Deut 23:19-20--persists!)

Languages challenged Toddsterpatriot

Says the guy who doesn't know what monopoly means. DURR.

Banks not Fed compliant have no rates to offer whatsoever

There are banking rules.
Rules the government put into place because the government doesn't have a monopoly on banking.

 

[mascale]

"Rules the government put into place. . ." is about the OP: Completely! The OP is about government monopoly of credit.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Pharaoh's rules(?) of Usury Economics remain in place even now!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

"Rules the government put into place. . ." is about the OP: Completely! The OP is about government monopoly of credit.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Pharaoh's rules(?) of Usury Economics remain in place even now!)

The OP is about government monopoly of credit.

Yes, I've been mocking your silly claim since post #2.

 

[mascale]

And so language-challenged Toddsterpatriot fails at understanding the US Central Bank, regarded the US Federal Reserve System: The banks. Then the usury of credit applies.

The Fed - What is the purpose of the Federal Reserve System?

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
("Mocking" is in the eye of the beholder. Even Pharaoh was able to manage a wink or two, at the time! "Cry freedom(?)!" See basis Deut 23:19-20!)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And so language-challenged Toddsterpatriot fails at understanding the US Central Bank, regarded the US Federal Reserve System: The banks. Then the usury of credit applies.

The Fed - What is the purpose of the Federal Reserve System?

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
("Mocking" is in the eye of the beholder. Even Pharaoh was able to manage a wink or two, at the time! "Cry freedom(?)!" See basis Deut 23:19-20!)

The usury of credit?
Dude!

Look up the definition of monopoly.
You might appear slightly less stupid the next time you post about banking or the Fed.