Central American "asylum" seekers given safe passage through Mexico

Honduras was ruled by military governments...
Honduras - The 20th century
it's always been a shithole
don't blame the US for that crap
What role did white supremacy's doctrine of "non-colonial imperial expansion" play in creating a "shithole" in Honduras?
img_6437-400x240.jpg

Taft and Wilson - AP U.S. History Topic Outlines - Study Notes

"Disorder and rebellion in Cuba, Honduras, and the Dominican Republic were causes for alarm in the United States.

"Most Caribbean countries at the time were politically unstable and desperately impoverished.

"The U.S. adopted a policy of 'non-colonial imperial expansion' in an attempt to bring stability and order to the region. Essentially, this unilateral policy enabled the U.S. to intervene in the region without actually taking control of any of these countries.

"The decision to intervene was at the discretion of President, although some countries requested U.S. assistance. People on both sides of the imperialism issue were critical of non-colonial imperial expansion.

"Imperialists believed that this policy was limiting and contrary to American interests.

"Anti-imperialists believed the strategy was too vague and would allow America to intervene in any situation it wanted."
 
Honduras was ruled by military governments...
Honduras - The 20th century
it's always been a shithole
don't blame the US for that crap
What role did white supremacy's doctrine of "non-colonial imperial expansion" play in creating a "shithole" in Honduras?
img_6437-400x240.jpg

Taft and Wilson - AP U.S. History Topic Outlines - Study Notes

"Disorder and rebellion in Cuba, Honduras, and the Dominican Republic were causes for alarm in the United States.

"Most Caribbean countries at the time were politically unstable and desperately impoverished.

"The U.S. adopted a policy of 'non-colonial imperial expansion' in an attempt to bring stability and order to the region. Essentially, this unilateral policy enabled the U.S. to intervene in the region without actually taking control of any of these countries.

"The decision to intervene was at the discretion of President, although some countries requested U.S. assistance. People on both sides of the imperialism issue were critical of non-colonial imperial expansion.

"Imperialists believed that this policy was limiting and contrary to American interests.

"Anti-imperialists believed the strategy was too vague and would allow America to intervene in any situation it wanted."
...just like in Africa--it was a shit hole before colonialism
...they were far behind in education/sanitation/technology/etc etc--before-during-after whites/colonialism/etc\
...the whites/America/etc did not cause the shithole--it was already there
 

Forum List

Back
Top