Censor Through Silence

[PoliticalChic]

1. While it is a regular media phenomenon...lying.....
a. the Buzzfeed story that they had documentation that Trump told his lawyer to lie to Congress
or
b. that a group of young boys bullied and harassed an elderly native American/Vietnam vet.....


...a particularly odious method is to simply ignore those facts and events that don't fit the Liberals/Democrat template.



2. "The 2019 Women’s March received roughly 15 times more news coverage than the 47th March for Life on broadcast television, according to the Media Research Center.

The Women’s March’s took place on Saturday despite widespread concerns of anti-Semitism within the group’s leadership.



3. “Between Wednesday morning and Saturday evening, the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,” Houck wrote. “For the March for Life, ABC and CBS were especially pitiful.”

The MRC's NewsBusters reported that ABC’s “Good Morning America” only spent six seconds on the March for Life on Saturday morning and it came during a segment on the Women’s March, while NBC spent the most time on the March of Life, with a whopping 44 seconds between Friday’s “Nightly News” and Saturday’s “Today.”
Women’s March receives significantly more broadcast TV coverage than March for Life, study shows


4. What could be the reason behind hiding the size of the anti-abortion movement, other than reporting the size of the movement that opposes killing the innocent unborn?
We can't have Democrat voters re-consider the slaughter that the Democrat Party stands for,can we.


5. ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’ ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’



And so, we are saddled with a media that hides alternative viewpoints.....censors them by ignoring them.

 

[Third Party]

Very thoughtful. Objectivity anywhere is hard to find. Moral of the story-Defend yourself at all times.

 

[william the wie]

hate to disappoint but the same complaint goes back to at least WWI

 

[william the wie]

Good to see you PC. The media sells butt wipe. If you want objectivity or at least a stab at it stick to financial media. although the march for life produces a lot more demand for diapers and soap. they also tend to have larger social circles and don't need the media

 

[PoliticalChic]

To get an idea of the size of the 2019 March For Life in D.C., that which wasn't an important news story for the Liberal media....here is a one minute time lapse that will amaze:






"...the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,”

 

[BlackFlag]

To get an idea of the size of the 2019 March For Life in D.C., that which wasn't an important news story for the Liberals media....here is a one minute time lapse that will amaze:






"...the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,”

That tired old shit happens every year. Not newsworthy.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

1. While it is a regular media phenomenon...lying.....
a. the Buzzfeed story that they had documentation that Trump told his lawyer to lie to Congress
or
b. that a group of young boys bullied and harassed an elderly native American/Vietnam vet.....


...a particularly odious method is to simply ignore those facts and events that don't fit the Liberals/Democrat template.



2. "The 2019 Women’s March received roughly 15 times more news coverage than the 47th March for Life on broadcast television, according to the Media Research Center.

The Women’s March’s took place on Saturday despite widespread concerns of anti-Semitism within the group’s leadership.



3. “Between Wednesday morning and Saturday evening, the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,” Houck wrote. “For the March for Life, ABC and CBS were especially pitiful.”

The MRC's NewsBusters reported that ABC’s “Good Morning America” only spent six seconds on the March for Life on Saturday morning and it came during a segment on the Women’s March, while NBC spent the most time on the March of Life, with a whopping 44 seconds between Friday’s “Nightly News” and Saturday’s “Today.”
Women’s March receives significantly more broadcast TV coverage than March for Life, study shows


4. What could be the reason behind hiding the size of the anti-abortion movement, other than reporting the size of the movement that opposes killing the innocent unborn?
We can't have Democrat voters re-consider the slaughter that the Democrat Party stands for,can we.


5. ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’ ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’



And so, we are saddled with a media that hides alternative viewpoints.....censors them by ignoring them.

A truly idiotic, dishonest, and wrongheaded thread premise – which comes as no surprise.

 

[H B Lowrie]

Guess americans shouldn't have sat on our/their asses when Clinton deregulated the FCC which allowed the US media landscape to be monopolized from 50 some odd companies back in the 1980s down to half a dozen multinational corporationos today.

1. While it is a regular media phenomenon...lying.....
a. the Buzzfeed story that they had documentation that Trump told his lawyer to lie to Congress
or
b. that a group of young boys bullied and harassed an elderly native American/Vietnam vet.....


...a particularly odious method is to simply ignore those facts and events that don't fit the Liberals/Democrat template.



2. "The 2019 Women’s March received roughly 15 times more news coverage than the 47th March for Life on broadcast television, according to the Media Research Center.

The Women’s March’s took place on Saturday despite widespread concerns of anti-Semitism within the group’s leadership.



3. “Between Wednesday morning and Saturday evening, the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,” Houck wrote. “For the March for Life, ABC and CBS were especially pitiful.”

The MRC's NewsBusters reported that ABC’s “Good Morning America” only spent six seconds on the March for Life on Saturday morning and it came during a segment on the Women’s March, while NBC spent the most time on the March of Life, with a whopping 44 seconds between Friday’s “Nightly News” and Saturday’s “Today.”
Women’s March receives significantly more broadcast TV coverage than March for Life, study shows


4. What could be the reason behind hiding the size of the anti-abortion movement, other than reporting the size of the movement that opposes killing the innocent unborn?
We can't have Democrat voters re-consider the slaughter that the Democrat Party stands for,can we.


5. ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’ ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’



And so, we are saddled with a media that hides alternative viewpoints.....censors them by ignoring them.

Guess americans shouldn't have sat on our/their asses when Clinton deregulated the FCC which allowed the US media landscape to be monopolized from 50 some odd companies back in the 1980s down to half a dozen multinational corporations today. But we did, so now we must blame someone else to avoid responsibility.

 

[william the wie]

The MSM needs to address people going through the young and stupids and who have not yet locked into brand loyalty. Abortion as contraception is part of the young and stupids for women.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Women's March was revealed as organized as much as by anti-Trump persons as by racist and anti-Semitic voices.

Hence:

"Organizers submitted a permit application estimating up to 500,000 participants even though it was widely expected that the turnout would be smaller.

This year was a more modest affair for multiple reasons. An estimated 100,000 protesters packed several blocks around Freedom Plaza, just east of the White House, holding a daylong rally. The march itself took about an hour and only moved about four blocks west along Pennsylvania Avenue past the Trump International Hotel before looping back to Freedom Plaza."
A Scaled-Down, But Still Angry, Women's March Returns



Yet the media ignored the larger venue:

Organizers of the March For LIfe "said on Twitter that the best estimate he was able to get was from an organizer who said 200,000 to 300,000 were there today."
https://heavy.com/news/2019/01/march-for-life-crowd-size-numbers-attended/

 

[PoliticalChic]

Guess americans shouldn't have sat on our/their asses when Clinton deregulated the FCC which allowed the US media landscape to be monopolized from 50 some odd companies back in the 1980s down to half a dozen multinational corporationos today.

1. While it is a regular media phenomenon...lying.....
a. the Buzzfeed story that they had documentation that Trump told his lawyer to lie to Congress
or
b. that a group of young boys bullied and harassed an elderly native American/Vietnam vet.....


...a particularly odious method is to simply ignore those facts and events that don't fit the Liberals/Democrat template.



2. "The 2019 Women’s March received roughly 15 times more news coverage than the 47th March for Life on broadcast television, according to the Media Research Center.

The Women’s March’s took place on Saturday despite widespread concerns of anti-Semitism within the group’s leadership.



3. “Between Wednesday morning and Saturday evening, the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,” Houck wrote. “For the March for Life, ABC and CBS were especially pitiful.”

The MRC's NewsBusters reported that ABC’s “Good Morning America” only spent six seconds on the March for Life on Saturday morning and it came during a segment on the Women’s March, while NBC spent the most time on the March of Life, with a whopping 44 seconds between Friday’s “Nightly News” and Saturday’s “Today.”
Women’s March receives significantly more broadcast TV coverage than March for Life, study shows


4. What could be the reason behind hiding the size of the anti-abortion movement, other than reporting the size of the movement that opposes killing the innocent unborn?
We can't have Democrat voters re-consider the slaughter that the Democrat Party stands for,can we.


5. ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’ ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’



And so, we are saddled with a media that hides alternative viewpoints.....censors them by ignoring them.

Guess americans shouldn't have sat on our/their asses when Clinton deregulated the FCC which allowed the US media landscape to be monopolized from 50 some odd companies back in the 1980s down to half a dozen multinational corporations today. But we did, so now we must blame someone else to avoid responsibility.

Nothing to do with the premise of the OP.....so, beat it, gasbag

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. While it is a regular media phenomenon...lying.....
a. the Buzzfeed story that they had documentation that Trump told his lawyer to lie to Congress
or
b. that a group of young boys bullied and harassed an elderly native American/Vietnam vet.....


...a particularly odious method is to simply ignore those facts and events that don't fit the Liberals/Democrat template.



2. "The 2019 Women’s March received roughly 15 times more news coverage than the 47th March for Life on broadcast television, according to the Media Research Center.

The Women’s March’s took place on Saturday despite widespread concerns of anti-Semitism within the group’s leadership.



3. “Between Wednesday morning and Saturday evening, the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,” Houck wrote. “For the March for Life, ABC and CBS were especially pitiful.”

The MRC's NewsBusters reported that ABC’s “Good Morning America” only spent six seconds on the March for Life on Saturday morning and it came during a segment on the Women’s March, while NBC spent the most time on the March of Life, with a whopping 44 seconds between Friday’s “Nightly News” and Saturday’s “Today.”
Women’s March receives significantly more broadcast TV coverage than March for Life, study shows


4. What could be the reason behind hiding the size of the anti-abortion movement, other than reporting the size of the movement that opposes killing the innocent unborn?
We can't have Democrat voters re-consider the slaughter that the Democrat Party stands for,can we.


5. ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’ ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’



And so, we are saddled with a media that hides alternative viewpoints.....censors them by ignoring them.

A truly idiotic, dishonest, and wrongheaded thread premise – which comes as no surprise.

Well, C_Chamber_Pot.....if you ever complete junior high school, you might be competent enough to actually author a cogent support of your usual 'I hate you' post.....

....maybe....

...but until then, let me embarrass you you pointing out that everything in the OP is 100% true, accurate, and correct....most especially the thread title.




Again:

1. While it is a regular media phenomenon...lying.....
a. the Buzzfeed story that they had documentation that Trump told his lawyer to lie to Congress
or
b. that a group of young boys bullied and harassed an elderly native American/Vietnam vet.....


...a particularly odious method is to simply ignore those facts and events that don't fit the Liberals/Democrat template.



2. "The 2019 Women’s March received roughly 15 times more news coverage than the 47th March for Life on broadcast television, according to the Media Research Center.

The Women’s March’s took place on Saturday despite widespread concerns of anti-Semitism within the group’s leadership.



3. “Between Wednesday morning and Saturday evening, the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,” Houck wrote. “For the March for Life, ABC and CBS were especially pitiful.”

The MRC's NewsBusters reported that ABC’s “Good Morning America” only spent six seconds on the March for Life on Saturday morning and it came during a segment on the Women’s March, while NBC spent the most time on the March of Life, with a whopping 44 seconds between Friday’s “Nightly News” and Saturday’s “Today.”
Women’s March receives significantly more broadcast TV coverage than March for Life, study shows


4. What could be the reason behind hiding the size of the anti-abortion movement, other than reporting the size of the movement that opposes killing the innocent unborn?
We can't have Democrat voters re-consider the slaughter that the Democrat Party stands for,can we.


5. ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’ ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’



And so, we are saddled with a media that hides alternative viewpoints.....censors them by ignoring them.

 

[anynameyouwish]

1. While it is a regular media phenomenon...lying.....
a. the Buzzfeed story that they had documentation that Trump told his lawyer to lie to Congress
or
b. that a group of young boys bullied and harassed an elderly native American/Vietnam vet.....


...a particularly odious method is to simply ignore those facts and events that don't fit the Liberals/Democrat template.



2. "The 2019 Women’s March received roughly 15 times more news coverage than the 47th March for Life on broadcast television, according to the Media Research Center.

The Women’s March’s took place on Saturday despite widespread concerns of anti-Semitism within the group’s leadership.



3. “Between Wednesday morning and Saturday evening, the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,” Houck wrote. “For the March for Life, ABC and CBS were especially pitiful.”

The MRC's NewsBusters reported that ABC’s “Good Morning America” only spent six seconds on the March for Life on Saturday morning and it came during a segment on the Women’s March, while NBC spent the most time on the March of Life, with a whopping 44 seconds between Friday’s “Nightly News” and Saturday’s “Today.”
Women’s March receives significantly more broadcast TV coverage than March for Life, study shows


4. What could be the reason behind hiding the size of the anti-abortion movement, other than reporting the size of the movement that opposes killing the innocent unborn?
We can't have Democrat voters re-consider the slaughter that the Democrat Party stands for,can we.


5. ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’ ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’



And so, we are saddled with a media that hides alternative viewpoints.....censors them by ignoring them.

speaking of media lies do you still think hillary was selling babies out of a pizza shop?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The MSM needs to address people going through the young and stupids and who have not yet locked into brand loyalty. Abortion as contraception is part of the young and stupids for women.

Interesting.

I always appreciate your posts, willie.....


My thinking on that subject is slightly different...and applies not to just the young.


The attraction of Leftism/Liberalism/Democrat Party hype is that it relieves one or any personal responsibility.....that cradle-to-grave pap......
....and especially in the realm of sexual relations.


There is no real accounting for the desire for abortion outside of convenience.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. While it is a regular media phenomenon...lying.....
a. the Buzzfeed story that they had documentation that Trump told his lawyer to lie to Congress
or
b. that a group of young boys bullied and harassed an elderly native American/Vietnam vet.....


...a particularly odious method is to simply ignore those facts and events that don't fit the Liberals/Democrat template.



2. "The 2019 Women’s March received roughly 15 times more news coverage than the 47th March for Life on broadcast television, according to the Media Research Center.

The Women’s March’s took place on Saturday despite widespread concerns of anti-Semitism within the group’s leadership.



3. “Between Wednesday morning and Saturday evening, the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,” Houck wrote. “For the March for Life, ABC and CBS were especially pitiful.”

The MRC's NewsBusters reported that ABC’s “Good Morning America” only spent six seconds on the March for Life on Saturday morning and it came during a segment on the Women’s March, while NBC spent the most time on the March of Life, with a whopping 44 seconds between Friday’s “Nightly News” and Saturday’s “Today.”
Women’s March receives significantly more broadcast TV coverage than March for Life, study shows


4. What could be the reason behind hiding the size of the anti-abortion movement, other than reporting the size of the movement that opposes killing the innocent unborn?
We can't have Democrat voters re-consider the slaughter that the Democrat Party stands for,can we.


5. ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’ ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’



And so, we are saddled with a media that hides alternative viewpoints.....censors them by ignoring them.

speaking of media lies do you still think hillary was selling babies out of a pizza shop?

When you oafs feel your worldview threatened, you feel the need to change the subject.

No dice, mud.


This is the subject: the Leftist media's desire to hide the March For Life.

1. While it is a regular media phenomenon...lying.....
a. the Buzzfeed story that they had documentation that Trump told his lawyer to lie to Congress
or
b. that a group of young boys bullied and harassed an elderly native American/Vietnam vet.....


...a particularly odious method is to simply ignore those facts and events that don't fit the Liberals/Democrat template.



2. "The 2019 Women’s March received roughly 15 times more news coverage than the 47th March for Life on broadcast television, according to the Media Research Center.

The Women’s March’s took place on Saturday despite widespread concerns of anti-Semitism within the group’s leadership.



3. “Between Wednesday morning and Saturday evening, the Women’s March fetched 14 minutes and 26 seconds of coverage… this stood in stark contrast to just 58 seconds for the March for Life,” Houck wrote. “For the March for Life, ABC and CBS were especially pitiful.”

The MRC's NewsBusters reported that ABC’s “Good Morning America” only spent six seconds on the March for Life on Saturday morning and it came during a segment on the Women’s March, while NBC spent the most time on the March of Life, with a whopping 44 seconds between Friday’s “Nightly News” and Saturday’s “Today.”
Women’s March receives significantly more broadcast TV coverage than March for Life, study shows


4. What could be the reason behind hiding the size of the anti-abortion movement, other than reporting the size of the movement that opposes killing the innocent unborn?
We can't have Democrat voters re-consider the slaughter that the Democrat Party stands for,can we.


5. ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’ ‘If You’re a Pro-life Democrat … You Know You’re Standing Alone’



And so, we are saddled with a media that hides alternative viewpoints.....censors them by ignoring them.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Press That Sicced Mob On Teenagers Based On 10-Second Video Clip Unsure Why Some People Call Them 'Fake News'
January 21st, 2019

U.S.—News outlets that incited an outraged internet mob against a group of Catholic school students based on a 10-second video clip, with no apparent attempt to fact-check or verify the information whatsoever, reported Monday that they are confused as to how some people could possibly consider them "fake news."


"I just don't get it," one CNN reporter said. "We worked really hard to fact-check the video a few days later and everything." He pointed out that without the media, no one would be around to misinform the public on important events, allowing people to quickly draw conclusions before all the facts are in. "What are people going to do---form their own conclusions after reviewing all the facts themselves? That'll never work."

A Washington Post journalist pointed to the news organization's slogan on the wall, "Democracy Dies in Darkness." "Our democracy would die without our hard work slanting the news to a particular worldview without bothering to check if our facts are accurate. It says so right there on the wall."

At publishing time, one reporter had proclaimed that while the story concerning Covington Catholic and the Native American protester was factually inaccurate, it was "morally right."
Press That Sicced Mob On Teenagers Based On 10-Second Video Clip Unsure Why Some People Call Them 'Fake News'