CBS New York: ’2016: Obama’s America’ Movie Is Disturbingly Necessary

[Leweman]

To watch this movie and realize – or simply be reminded of – all that is unknown about President Obama is of concern. Much of the information has been ignored by the American media totally. When appropriately reminded as to what is still unknown about Obama to date, one has to ask: How can any logical-thinking person give a damn about Romney’s taxes while not asking any questions regarding our current president’s past?

Those who have already decided to vote for Obama will probably not even see the movie. It’s sad but they probably don’t want to know the truth when it is laid out so clearly for them in this documentary. The independents who are still deciding who they are going to vote for ought to see this film. I’m quite confident that any undecided voter who sees this film will know who to vote for after viewing this documentary. If you know you’re not going to support the “left” in this coming election, see the film out of interest if you like. But, fair warning, it’s disturbing – and quite frightening – to say the least.

’2016: Obama’s America’ Movie Is Disturbingly Necessary « CBS New York

Yeah... Yeah... it's actually a conservative commentator that writes for CBS but Dems do this all the time with Forbes or the Wall Street Journal. Regardless, what he's saying is still true.

 

[American_Jihad]

Documentary film ‘2016: Obama’s America’ takes came out of nowhere to burn up box office​

By Dan Zak, Monday, August 27,2012
---

In 87 minutes, using D’Souza’s texts as a foundation, “2016” declares that the absence of his father compelled Obama to overachieve his way to the presidency, which he was able to obtain largely because of his skin color, and that he is waiting until his second term to implement the anti-colonialist policies of his father, his fellow activists and his professors by stripping wealth from the upper classes, bankrupting the country so it can be remade into a socialist state, depleting America’s nuclear warheads and permitting a “United States of Islam” to align between Morocco and Pakistan and squelch Israel.

“I’m conservative, but open-minded, and will want to watch it again,” says Frank, a federal employee who lives in the District and declined to give his last name. He learned about the movie Sunday on Facebook and attended the 12:50 p.m. showing Monday at Regal Gallery Place. “I never thought about the colonial background. It’s interesting that they’ve thought about what could happen” if Obama is reelected.
---

Documentary film ‘2016: Obama’s America’ takes approach - The Washington Post

2016: Obama's America​

Trailer - IMDb*1hr 29min** - Rated PG** - Documentary
*
Director: Dinesh D'Souza - Cast: Dr. Paul Vitz, Dr. Alice Dewey, Dr. Paul Kengor, Willy Kauai, George Obama

Immersed in exotic locales across four continents, best selling author Dinesh D'Souza races against time to find answers to Obama's past and reveal where America will be in 2016. During this journey he discovers how Hope and Change became radically misunderstood, and identifies more »new flashpoints for hot wars in mankind's greatest struggle. The journey moves quickly over the arc of the old colonial empires, into America's empire of liberty, and we see the unfolding realignment of nations and the shape of the global future.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-G1OT5gzb48]2016 Obama's America Trailer 2 - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbusRvo2cH8&feature=related]Dr. Dinesh D'Souza "2016: Obama's America" - The Jesse Lee Peterson Radio Show - YouTube[/ame]

 

[American_Jihad]

BERG: D’Souza’s ‘2016’: Watch out, Hollywood

New film unleashes conservative talent

9/3/12
By Dave Berg

Dinesh D'Souza’s sleeper political documentary “2016: Obama’s America” was the No. 1, largest-grossing conservative documentary ever in its first week of wide release last week.

It came in at No. 7 on the top 10 list while playing in just one-third the number of theaters where other, wider-release films were screened. As the film continues to open in more and more theaters, its numbers invariably will get bigger, perhaps even reaching No. 1.

This makes Mr. D'Souza, an unassuming, nerdy-looking writer and academic, Hollywood’s newest celebrity. His anti-Obama message has resonated with audiences despite minimal coverage from the media. Until now, that is.

The well-produced $2.5-million documentary features Mr. D'Souza as the low-profile, understated narrator, which makes the former Reagan adviser and current president of King's College in New York City more authentic and believable for a polemic film. There is no ranting through a bullhorn or ambushing unsuspecting public officials as Michael Moore did in his left-wing films, such as “Fahrenheit 9/11,” the largest-grossing documentary to date. Mr. D'Souza avoids hot-button issues such as the authenticity of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth, which he doesn’t question.

Instead, he simply tells the story of the president’s past to illustrate how his worldview was influenced by anti-colonialist, Third-World thinking. He does this by traveling to and researching places where Mr. Obama grew up, including Hawaii, Indonesia and Kenya. Mr. D'Souza contends he has much in common with Mr. Obama, as they both grew up around people who ardently believed rich countries only got that way by taking natural resources from poor nations.

---

Read more: BERG: D'Souza's '2016': Watch out, Hollywood - Washington Times BERG: D'Souza's '2016': Watch out, Hollywood - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

 

[Mac1958]

.

D'Souza had to do a lot of research for this. I wonder how much information he came across that does not support his thesis. I wonder how much information he came across that categorically contradicts his thesis. And I wonder how much of that information is in the movie.

I guess we'll never know, huh?

.

 

[Freewill]

.

D'Souza had to do a lot of research for this. I wonder how much information he came across that does not support his thesis. I wonder how much information he came across that categorically contradicts his thesis. And I wonder how much of that information is in the movie.

I guess we'll never know, huh?

.

None, until you prove otherwise. Quite the loaded question.

 

[Mac1958]

.

D'Souza had to do a lot of research for this. I wonder how much information he came across that does not support his thesis. I wonder how much information he came across that categorically contradicts his thesis. And I wonder how much of that information is in the movie.

I guess we'll never know, huh?

.

None, until you prove otherwise. Quite the loaded question.

Given the behavior of the average political partisan, I think it's a pretty reasonable question.

.

 

[American_Jihad]

.

D'Souza had to do a lot of research for this. I wonder how much information he came across that does not support his thesis. I wonder how much information he came across that categorically contradicts his thesis. And I wonder how much of that information is in the movie.

I guess we'll never know, huh?.

Same goes for


Michael Francis Moore

​

 

[Mac1958]

.

D'Souza had to do a lot of research for this. I wonder how much information he came across that does not support his thesis. I wonder how much information he came across that categorically contradicts his thesis. And I wonder how much of that information is in the movie.

I guess we'll never know, huh?.

Same goes for


Michael Francis Moore

​

Yup, absolutely.

If it's political, and a person believes it, it's their own fault.

.

 

[Rozman]

Only Michael Moore tells the truth when he makes a movie....

 

[Mac1958]

Only Michael Moore tells the truth when he makes a movie....

.

 

[Darkwind]

.

D'Souza had to do a lot of research for this. I wonder how much information he came across that does not support his thesis. I wonder how much information he came across that categorically contradicts his thesis. And I wonder how much of that information is in the movie.

I guess we'll never know, huh?

.

Do you ask these same questions of the DNC?

 

[Mac1958]

.

D'Souza had to do a lot of research for this. I wonder how much information he came across that does not support his thesis. I wonder how much information he came across that categorically contradicts his thesis. And I wonder how much of that information is in the movie.

I guess we'll never know, huh?

.

Do you ask these same questions of the DNC?

DNC, RNC, Rush, Hannity, Levin, Maddow, Schultz, Matthews, politicians, "pundits", "contributors", "politicos", every last goddamn one of them.

Partisan ideologues are intellectually dishonest. They minimize contradictory data and employ spin, hyperbole, denial, distortion, straw man arguments, omission and outright lies as a matter of second nature. They have little if any credibility and are, in general, not to be believed.

Political affiliation irrelevant.

.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

.

D'Souza had to do a lot of research for this. I wonder how much information he came across that does not support his thesis. I wonder how much information he came across that categorically contradicts his thesis. And I wonder how much of that information is in the movie.

I guess we'll never know, huh?

.

deflect much?

 

[Mac1958]

.

D'Souza had to do a lot of research for this. I wonder how much information he came across that does not support his thesis. I wonder how much information he came across that categorically contradicts his thesis. And I wonder how much of that information is in the movie.

I guess we'll never know, huh?

.

deflect much?

Huh? Where?

.