PLYMCO_PILGRIM
Gold Member
Unemployment continued to rise with the stimulus.
There is no room for truth in a politically motivated and biased thread!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Unemployment continued to rise with the stimulus.
A private sector job is still a job
The left opens mouth and farts lies out all the time. Your fav president, clinton proved it.the right just keeps lying at every turn
Socialists can never understand the American way.A private sector job is still a job
if you understood the mindset of the American worker, you would understand that a temporary job is no more valuable to the economy than that same empoloyee being on unemployment.
And if you understood the labor market, you would be aware that an employee on a temporary job that exists ONLY becuase of government injection of money actually hampers that employees chances of getting a permanent job.
But alas, you do not understand the mindset of the American worker nor do you understand the labor market.
the only people any of you on the right believe are right woing sources.
You are worthless to any adult debate
Nice try...but the unemployment rate was already over 8% when the stimulus passed
A private sector job is still a job
Obama's 2009 stimulus is still boosting jobs
The $825 billion economic stimulus law signed by President Obama in February 2009 is still having a positive impact on the economy some 30 months later, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
In its latest quarterly report, the agency said the law's combination of aid to states and localities, public works projects, tax cuts and other spending increased the number of people with jobs by 1 million to 2.9 million between April and June of this year.
It said the law lowered the unemployment rate for that quarter by 0.5 to 1.6 percentage points -- meaning the rate could have been above 10% without the law's stimulative provisions. And it said the law boosted economic growth in that quarter by 0.8% to 2.5%.
And to think....EVERY Republican voted against the stimulus
In other words, this is based on MODELS and not on actual jobs created. This has already been addressed in the first quarterly reports:Those estimateswhich CBO considers more comprehensive than the recipients' reportsare based on evidence from similar policies enacted in the past and on the results of various economic models.
From the directors own mouth - actual performance has nothing to do with the numbers the CBO releases in their quarterly reports.When asked if this means that any actual underperformance of the stimulus would fail to show up in the CBO's stimulus jobs count, Elmendorf replied "That's right." This means the 1.5 million jobs saved estimate was pre-determined.
Nice try...but the unemployment rate was already over 8% when the stimulus passed
The Unemployment rate was 8.2% when Obama signed the 'crapulus' bill into law in Fed 2009. We were told it would keep the rate from going above that level.
Since it was signed, the rate was below 9% only 4 of the 28 months that have passed.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
It did shit to the rate.
A private sector job is still a job
if you understood the mindset of the American worker, you would understand that a temporary job is no more valuable to the economy than that same empoloyee being on unemployment.
Nice try...but the unemployment rate was already over 8% when the stimulus passed
The Unemployment rate was 8.2% when Obama signed the 'crapulus' bill into law in Fed 2009. We were told it would keep the rate from going above that level.
Since it was signed, the rate was below 9% only 4 of the 28 months that have passed.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
It did shit to the rate.
A private sector job is still a job
TM, you don't even have a job or an education to speak of... So of course you think you understand how to create job and believe education is important and attack anyone (other than yourself) that does not have a "higher education." Actually you attack them even if they do create jobs and have lots of college education as long as they are white or Republican and dont agree with a muppet like you.
it does not take rocket science to know that if you take a half a trillion dollars and dedicate it to creating jobs, it will create jobs.
That was never the issue.
Really? Are you retarded? btw that's a rhetorical question.
"The stimulus has not created one private sector job." Gov. Rick Scott, 2010
PolitiFact Florida | Rick Scott says the stimulus didn't create a single private sector job
"You know, after the $1 trillion dollars stimulus bill that didnt create any jobs..." Boehner
"The Obama stimulus has been a monumental failure that hasn't created a single job..." Newt Gingrich
Gingrich And Boehner Argue Stimulus Is A Failure That Hasnt Created A Single Job | ThinkProgress
"The last stimulus bill didnt create one new job..." Scott Brown
PolitiFact | Scott Brown says stimulus 'didn't create one new job'
Etc., etc.
No, that was never the issue, except when it was.
Nice try...but the unemployment rate was already over 8% when the stimulus passed
The Unemployment rate was 8.2% when Obama signed the 'crapulus' bill into law in Fed 2009. We were told it would keep the rate from going above that level.
Since it was signed, the rate was below 9% only 4 of the 28 months that have passed.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
It did shit to the rate.
funny thing...
During the Bush years (prior to the recession), the unemployment numbers barely moved from the 4.3-5.2 range.....and that is why the left claim that no jobs were created.
Yet under Obama, the unemployment rate went from 8% to 10% and now still at 9% and that is NOT an indication of no jobs created. To the contrary, that is an indication of MANY jobs created.
The hypocirsy is amusing...I mean...you cant make this stuff up.
Nice try...but the unemployment rate was already over 8% when the stimulus passed
The Unemployment rate was 8.2% when Obama signed the 'crapulus' bill into law in Fed 2009. We were told it would keep the rate from going above that level.
Since it was signed, the rate was below 9% only 4 of the 28 months that have passed.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
It did shit to the rate.
it does not take rocket science to know that if you take a half a trillion dollars and dedicate it to creating jobs, it will create jobs.
That was never the issue.
Really? Are you retarded? btw that's a rhetorical question.
"The stimulus has not created one private sector job." Gov. Rick Scott, 2010
PolitiFact Florida | Rick Scott says the stimulus didn't create a single private sector job
"You know, after the $1 trillion dollars stimulus bill that didnt create any jobs..." Boehner
"The Obama stimulus has been a monumental failure that hasn't created a single job..." Newt Gingrich
Gingrich And Boehner Argue Stimulus Is A Failure That Hasnt Created A Single Job | ThinkProgress
"The last stimulus bill didnt create one new job..." Scott Brown
PolitiFact | Scott Brown says stimulus 'didn't create one new job'
Etc., etc.
No, that was never the issue, except when it was.
I said "create jobs" not "create private sector jobs"
The truth is, the stimulus created temporary jobs....not real jobs. The jobs are only as good as long as the money lasts. It did nothing poisitive for creating permanent private sector jobs.
And no...I am not retarded. To the contrary, I am quite intelligent with a degree from Syracuse University in Economics (Maxwell School of Citizenship) and have run 3 companies of which one I sold after 5 years and the other two are surviving nicely during these difficult times.
A private sector job is still a job
if you understood the mindset of the American worker, you would understand that a temporary job is no more valuable to the economy than that same empoloyee being on unemployment.
What retard told you that?
So the millions of temporay jobs that come along every holiday season, or every summer when construction ramps up for example,
those jobs are of NO VALUE to the economy...according to you.
You may be the most stupid poster on this forum.
Nice try...but the unemployment rate was already over 8% when the stimulus passed
The Unemployment rate was 8.2% when Obama signed the 'crapulus' bill into law in Fed 2009. We were told it would keep the rate from going above that level.
Since it was signed, the rate was below 9% only 4 of the 28 months that have passed.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
It did shit to the rate.
When were you told that stimulus would keep unemployment below 8%??
Lets see the quote