Contumacious
Radical Freedom
- Thread starter
- #21
Yes, it is criminal behavior. To say otherwise reveals the delusional emotional world that you inhabit.
No it is not criminal behavior. To say otherwise reveals that your are a sheeple.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes, it is criminal behavior. To say otherwise reveals the delusional emotional world that you inhabit.
Yes, it is criminal behavior. To say otherwise reveals the delusional emotional world that you inhabit.
No it is not criminal behavior. To say otherwise reveals that your are a sheeple.
.
a bullshit religious "crime".
Two weeks after Polanski plied her with Champagne and a Quaalude, Samantha Gailey appeared before an L.A. grand jury and recalled Polanski's predatory behavior in a Mulholland Canyon home owned by Jack Nicholson.
The teenager's troubling--and contemporaneous--account of her abuse at Polanski's hands begins with her posing twice for topless photos that the director said were for French Vogue. The girl then told prosecutors how Polanski directed her to, "Take off your underwear" and enter the Jacuzzi, where he photographed her naked. Soon, the director, who was then 43, joined her in the hot tub. He also wasn't wearing any clothes and, according to Gailey's testimony, wrapped his hands around the child's waist.
The girl testified that she left the Jacuzzi and entered a bedroom in Nicholson's home, where Polanski sat down beside her and kissed the teen, despite her demands that he "keep away." According to Gailey, Polanski then performed a sex act on her and later "started to have intercourse with me." At one point, according to Gailey's testimony, Polanski asked the 13-year-old if she was "on the pill," and "When did you last have your period?" Polanski then asked her, Gailey recalled, "Would you want me to go in through your back?" before he "put his penis in my butt." Asked why she did not more forcefully resist Polanski, the teenager told Deputy D.A. Roger Gunson, "Because I was afraid of him."
Following his indictment on various sex charges, Polanski agreed to a plea deal that spared him prison time (he had spent about 45 days in jail during a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation). But when it seemed that a Superior Court judge might not honor the deal--and sentence Polanski to prison--the director fled the country.
Below you'll find links to Gailey's grand jury testimony, the heart of which runs 36 pages (we've broken the transcript into two 18-page sections for easier navigation).
The Smoking Gun: Archive
Key word: FEMI-NAZI
So persecuting a man and pretending that a plea agreement - which was obtained FRAUDENTLY - is valid may be OK to you but those of us that care for due process of law reject it.
.
He confessed to plying a 13 year old child with drink and drugs. He chose to plead it out - he was welcome to due process and then skipped because the judge decided to impose a harsher sentence than had been agreed upon.
If being pleased that this scumbag rapist gets his ass hauled back to face his punishment.
Who hit you with the jackass stick?
Key word: FEMI-NAZI
So persecuting a man and pretending that a plea agreement - which was obtained FRAUDENTLY - is valid may be OK to you but those of us that care for due process of law reject it.
.
Yes, it is criminal behavior. To say otherwise reveals the delusional emotional world that you inhabit.
No it is not criminal behavior. To say otherwise reveals that your are a sheeple.
.
yes, it is criminal behavior. to say otherwise reveals you're a predator, shorteyes.
No it is not criminal behavior. To say otherwise reveals that your are a sheeple.
.
yes, it is criminal behavior. to say otherwise reveals you're a predator, shorteyes.
Hummmmmmmmm
You want to have sex with a 13 y/o so bad that you can taste . You are engaging in REACTION FORMATION:
In psychoanalytic theory, reaction formation is a defensive process (defense mechanism) in which anxiety-producing or unacceptable emotions and impulses are mastered by exaggeration (hypertrophy) of the directly opposing tendency.[1][2]
.
a bullshit religious "crime".
Two weeks after Polanski plied her with Champagne and a Quaalude, Samantha Gailey appeared before an L.A. grand jury and recalled Polanski's predatory behavior in a Mulholland Canyon home owned by Jack Nicholson.
The teenager's troubling--and contemporaneous--account of her abuse at Polanski's hands begins with her posing twice for topless photos that the director said were for French Vogue. The girl then told prosecutors how Polanski directed her to, "Take off your underwear" and enter the Jacuzzi, where he photographed her naked. Soon, the director, who was then 43, joined her in the hot tub. He also wasn't wearing any clothes and, according to Gailey's testimony, wrapped his hands around the child's waist.
The girl testified that she left the Jacuzzi and entered a bedroom in Nicholson's home, where Polanski sat down beside her and kissed the teen, despite her demands that he "keep away." According to Gailey, Polanski then performed a sex act on her and later "started to have intercourse with me." At one point, according to Gailey's testimony, Polanski asked the 13-year-old if she was "on the pill," and "When did you last have your period?" Polanski then asked her, Gailey recalled, "Would you want me to go in through your back?" before he "put his penis in my butt." Asked why she did not more forcefully resist Polanski, the teenager told Deputy D.A. Roger Gunson, "Because I was afraid of him."
Following his indictment on various sex charges, Polanski agreed to a plea deal that spared him prison time (he had spent about 45 days in jail during a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation). But when it seemed that a Superior Court judge might not honor the deal--and sentence Polanski to prison--the director fled the country.
Below you'll find links to Gailey's grand jury testimony, the heart of which runs 36 pages (we've broken the transcript into two 18-page sections for easier navigation).
The Smoking Gun: Archive
Looks like everyone at USMB is a femi-nazi.
Except the poster that thinks getting thirteen year olds drunk and raping them is acceptable behavior.
yes, it is criminal behavior. to say otherwise reveals you're a predator, shorteyes.
Hummmmmmmmm
You want to have sex with a 13 y/o so bad that you can taste . You are engaging in REACTION FORMATION:
In psychoanalytic theory, reaction formation is a defensive process (defense mechanism) in which anxiety-producing or unacceptable emotions and impulses are mastered by exaggeration (hypertrophy) of the directly opposing tendency.[1][2]
.
.
uh, no.
sorry, shorteyes, everybody isn't like you.
Hummmmmmmmm
You want to have sex with a 13 y/o so bad that you can taste . You are engaging in REACTION FORMATION:
In psychoanalytic theory, reaction formation is a defensive process (defense mechanism) in which anxiety-producing or unacceptable emotions and impulses are mastered by exaggeration (hypertrophy) of the directly opposing tendency.[1][2]
.
.
uh, no.
sorry, shorteyes, everybody isn't like you.
Let's get serious here.
Are you mad because Roman had sex with a 13 y/o in LA while you have to fly all the way to Thailand?!?!?!?!?
.
Looks like everyone at USMB is a femi-nazi.
No there are some homosexuals who believe that Roman should have been doing them instead. Would that be you?
Except the poster that thinks getting thirteen year olds drunk and raping them is acceptable behavior.
That's pure fiction and you know it.
.
Gotta agree the plea has fraud written all over itSo persecuting a man and pretending that a plea agreement - which was obtained FRAUDENTLY - is valid may be OK to you but those of us who care for due process of law reject it.
Gotta agree the plea has fraud written all over itSo persecuting a man and pretending that a plea agreement - which was obtained FRAUDENTLY - is valid may be OK to you but those of us who care for due process of law reject it.
The fraud here seems, as is typical, to follow the money; Roman Polanski's money.
Polanski knew the case was lost.
Polanski knew he had sodomized the girl.
Polanski entered a plea hoping to avoid jail time.
Polanski then fled the country to avoid the jail time when his first ploy to escape punishment failed.
Only now that Polanski requires the medical expertise found only in countries with extradition treaties with the US does he get arrested.
Yeah I can see the fraudulent intent in that original plea.
Gotta agree the plea has fraud written all over itSo persecuting a man and pretending that a plea agreement - which was obtained FRAUDENTLY - is valid may be OK to you but those of us who care for due process of law reject it.
The fraud here seems, as is typical, to follow the money; Roman Polanski's money.
Polanski knew the case was lost.
Polanski knew he had sodomized the girl.
Polanski entered a plea hoping to avoid jail time.
Polanski then fled the country to avoid the jail time when his first ploy to escape punishment failed.
Only now that Polanski requires the medical expertise found only in countries with extradition treaties with the US does he get arrested.
Yeah I can see the fraudulent intent in that original plea.
Excuse Mr. Sucker:
The Prosecutor knew that Ms Geimer had lied on her resume by stating that her age was 14.
The Prosecutor also understood that Ms Geimer had a reputation of being a Lolita so he felt a need to enhance the indictment by alleging "drugging" and coached her to testify before the grand jury. The strategy was to force Mr. Polanski to plead guilty without going to trial.
The grand jury testimony was never subjected to cross examination so it is useless.
The plea was induced by a promise that he could withdraw the plea if the judge did not accept probation as a sentence.
.
The plea was induced by a promise that he could withdraw the plea if the judge did not accept probation as a sentence.