Cartoons Need The First Amendment More Than Ever

[Flanders]

The United Nations laid the foundation for the Charlie Hebdo slaughter in Paris. Go back to 2010:

The United Nations wants to criminalize religious heresy, provided that those making the claim are Islamists.

Later this month, the United Nations General Assembly will vote on the nonbinding Defamation of Religions Resolution, which would give international sanction to the type of religious persecution commonplace in Muslim-majority countries. Superficially, the resolution contains feel-good human rights language routinely churned out by the U.N. The intent of this resolution, however, is to give sanction to repressive mechanisms that primarily Muslim countries use to stifle critiques of their state-sanctioned sects. This lends international legitimacy to criminal penalties against people who exercise their freedom of worship.​

EDITORIAL: The United (Muslim) Nations?
U.N. resolution gives special protection to Islamist regimes
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES - The Washington Times - Friday, December 10, 2010

EDITORIAL The United Muslim Nations - Washington Times​

Now move forward to 2011:

Thanks to the Obama Administration – Criticism of Islamic violence will be forbidden.

XXXXX​

Look for this new resolution to be used against anyone who dares criticize Islamic violence. Why else would the OIC and Obama push it?

By the way… There have been 18,161 deadly attacks in the name of Islam since 9-11.​

Obama Administration Pushes UN Resolution That Bans Criticism of Islamic Radicalism
Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 21, 2011, 5:06 AM

Obama Administration Pushes UN Resolution That Bans Criticism of Islamic Radicalism The Gateway Pundit​

The last time I looked the First Amendment still protected a free press; nevertheless, you now know why Taqiyya the Liar forbids the American media from publishing cartoons that pokes fun at Islam. The fact is that Taqiyya’s prohibition gives media cowards cover for NOT publishing cartoons that Muslims might offensive to Mohammad. Not so with Jesus Christ.

Incidentally, thanks to tax deductible advertising dollars press barons have more money than Allah, but not a one of them has the courage shown by the Charlie Hebdo staff in Paris, nor will one press baron pay armed guards prepared to shoot down terrorists. Can you imagine how the Chicago sewer rat would react if private guards defended the First Amendment!

And what a twist of fate it would be if Muslim terrorists attacked Madison Avenue ad agencies when they cannot invade well-armed newspapers and television stations. Hell, who needs the United Nations? Achmed the Dead Terrorist might end up tearing down the whole damn government structure in order to kill anyone who laughs at Mohamad.

Achmed The Dead Terrorist Chrismas Special HD - YouTube​

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

I heard about the Charlie Hebdo Islamic terrorist attack late yesterday, Flanders. It was horrifying to see those guys out on the street with weapons in hand and no one to stop them. This is a huge part of the problem in France - their police do not even carry concealed weapons. If they didn't want to fire on the terrorists - they could have at least taken out the tires on the car - disabling it. (armed officers / citizens)
This is what happens when the law abiding citizens are not permitted to have concealed weapons on their person. The news report said that Charlie Hebdo magazine had already been the target of terrorists. Everyone of their staff should have been carrying a concealed weapon - and they should have had guards as well - why didn't they? I do not understand why they wouldn't set up their own intell and hire armed bodyguards - if they didn't have them, Flanders. That is truly a mystery to me. As for the cartoons? Unless they were Jack Chick Tract style I wouldn't be interested. Nevertheless, freedom of the press must prevail. Out of this should come at least a dozen or more new magazines willing to confront the truth about Islam head on.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

To be clear, Flanders. This story has nothing to do with trained ISIL, ISIS fighters or a radicalized form of Islam. Islam is radical. This is a teaching that goes back to the very beginnings of Islam from Mohammad. He had a Jew murdered who wrote a poem about him that offended him. This is standard operating in the Islamic World according to Islam. Not some abberation of it. Where was ISIS when this happened?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/03/international/europe/03dutch.html?_r=0

Theo van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker and writer who had recently made a television film critical of Islam, was shot and stabbed to death on an Amsterdam street on Tuesday.

The killing shocked the Netherlands, already apprehensive over large-scale Muslim immigration, which has provoked an angry public debate. Mr. van Gogh's film added to that debate after it was broadcast in September.

Shortly after the killing, the police arrested a 26-year-old man of dual Dutch and Moroccan nationality, whom they refused to identify. It was not immediately clear if he had any connections to militant groups, but the police said he was not known to any Dutch law enforcement agency and that he had not been under surveillance.

Before fleeing, the man left a note on the body of the victim, said Eric Vermeulen, a spokesman for the Amsterdam police. The police declined to describe the contents of the message. The Dutch news media reported that it contained passages from the Koran.
____________________
Flanders, the reason the police declined to describe the contents of the note - it contained the murder verses in Koran that justify jihad against non Muslims. Had they publicized the truth - it would have alarmed many of their citizens who are fed a pseudo Islam that doesn't exist in Islamic learning centers of universities, colleges, and the like. There is only one Islam and it is radical. To the core.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Bo Ra Choi - a South Korean Pastor was given a vision of Mohammad in hell, Flanders. This video is based on her vision and what Mohammad said from hell. When we think of law and justice we tend to think about it from the standpoint of world governments, courts, judges - not realizing that God Almighty is the ultimate judge and that one day the same fate that Mohammad met will be met by every single Muslim - violent or not - who denies Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior and holds fast to the teachings of Mohammad. This is not what Mohammad wanted at all - from hell he pleads that his followers would follow Jesus Christ who is God and not follow his false teachings of revenge, murder, sex slavery, etc. He says again and again he was wrong. How right he is about that! See the video and pass it on. You never know who may be saved out of Islam and that is afterall, the desire of God. That none would perish.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Muhammad is in hell - pleading with the people who believed his teachings to turn to Jesus Christ and they won't listen. How troubling is that?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The United Nations laid the foundation for the Charlie Hebdo...

...

...

​

The United Nations? who gives two shits?

 

[Vigilante]

Bill Maher: Hundreds of Millions of Muslims Support Attack on ‘Charlie Hebdo’

Daily Beast ^
The comedian responded to the deadly attack on a French satirical magazine by renewing his recent criticisms of the Islamic faith. Bill Maher didn’t hold back Wednesday night, blasting “hundreds of millions” of the world’s Muslims for allegedly supporting the Islamic terrorist massacre of cartoonists, writers, and editors at a Parisian satirical magazine that has mocked the Prophet Muhammad. “I know most Muslim people would not have carried out an attack like this,” the host of HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher said on ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live. “But here’s the important point: Hundreds of millions of them support an...

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Bill Maher..

Does anyone take him seriously anymore?

 

[Vigilante]

Bill Maher..

Does anyone take him seriously anymore?

It's where the fucking left get there talking points, and Jon Stewart their news.... Such ICONS and you've forgotten one of your 2 sources!

 

[Flanders]

The United Nations? who gives two shits?

To Dante: Your president for one along with just about everybody else in the federal government and the entire education industry.

UNITED NATIONS – By refusing to associate the Paris terrorist attacks with Islam, President Obama is engaging in “Shariah compliant” speech, charges Joy Brighton, author of the 2014 book “Sharia-ism is Here: The Battle to Control Women; and Everyone Else.”

XXXXX​

In addition to Obama’s comments Wednesday in the immediate aftermath of the Paris shooting, Brighton referenced his speech to the United Nations General Assembly in New York Sept. 25, 2012, in which he said, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

XXXXX​

“Barack Obama is complying with Shariah law in suggesting that criticism of Islam could be a criminal hate-speech offense,” she said. “In his statement to the United Nations, Obama does not defend free speech, has given in to Shariah law, and doing so as president is unconstitutional, because with this statement Obama abandons the First Amendment and the defense of free speech.”

XXXXX​

“Islam is protected under the First Amendment definitions of free speech and free religion,” she noted. “‘Shariah-ism’ is a totalitarian political movement that is not protected under the First Amendment.”

Brighton extended her reasoning to argue that repeated efforts since 1999 by the United Nations to pass a resolution against religious defamation is really an effort to grandfather into international law blasphemy definitions derived from Islamic law in places like Pakistan.

Obama's remarks on Paris shooting 'Shariah-compliant'
Posted By Jerome R. Corsi On 01/08/2015 @ 7:49 pm

Obama 8217 s remarks on Paris shooting 8216 Shariah-compliant 8217 ​

 

[Flanders]

My gal Michelle Malkin names names:

"Under Times standards," a newspaper spokesman said in a statement this week, "we do not normally publish images or other material deliberately intended to offend religious sensibilities. After careful consideration, Times editors decided that describing the cartoons in question would give readers sufficient information to understand today's story."

XXXXX​

While they feign free-speech fortitude, what Times editorialists really don't want to see is their heads completely disconnected from their necks. Neither do editors at The Boston Globe, ABC News, NBC News, MSNBC and CNBC, who won't publish any possibly, remotely upsetting images of Mohammed, either.​

NOTE: Press barons take every precaution in order to prevent their own heads from suddenly being separated from their necks.

The Religion of Perpetual Outrage hates all infidels for all reasons for all time. The targeting of Mohammed cartoonists is a convenient excuse to feed the eternal flame of radical Islamists' hatred of the West. If it isn't cartoons, it's something else. The grudge is everlasting.

XXXXX​

The Associated Press wins the pusillanimity prize after invoking the sensitivity card to explain why it refrained from publishing "deliberately provocative" Mo toons -- even though the media conglomerate had been selling deliberately provocative "Piss Christ" photos on its website. After the Washington Examiner's Tim Carney pointed out the double standards, AP tried to cover its tracks by yanking the pic.

More absurdity? The New York Daily News pixelated a Mo toon carried by Charlie Hebdo as if it were pornography. CNN did the same in 2006, when it explained it was censoring the offending images "in respect for Islam" and "because the network believes its role is to cover the events surrounding the publication of the cartoons while not unnecessarily adding fuel to the controversy itself."

Media Cowards and the Cartoon Jihad
Michelle Malkin | Jan 09, 2015

Media Cowards and the Cartoon Jihad - Michelle Malkin - Page 1​

 

[Flanders]

The last time I looked the First Amendment still protected a free press; nevertheless, you now know why Taqiyya the Liar forbids the American media from publishing cartoons that pokes fun at Islam.

There are none so deaf as those who refuse to hear.

 

[Flanders]

For as long as I can recall major press reportage in Europe and America they promoted Socialism, collectivism, multicultural, universal open-borders, global government, the United Nations, and every other political agenda they shoved down the public’s collectivist throat for the common good. Ditto Hollywood movies and television. Now, the same press barons claim they remain impartial less they be accused of offending Islam. Ditto Hollywood movies and television.

Interestingly, the press turned on Nazi Germany, but never did turn on a Communist country, and certainly not on Islam whose war has been going on longer than was all of our wars combined. Note that the war in Afghanistan belongs in Islam’s column not ours.

Parenthetically, for decades individual media journalists had to make their bosses look good; so they sold this bullcrap —— The stories I report are carefully kept separate from my political beliefs. That scam worked from the beginning of the TV years until the Internet blow it away. (A few still try to get away with it.)

Guess what! British press barons are protecting Islam —— my mistake —— they are only protecting enemy combatants fighting for Islam. The newspapers listed in the picture show the Brits to be just as bad, or worse, than their American cousins.

To Islamist demands, the British media submits
By Al Kaltman Full Story

Canada Free Press Conservative News Politics Editorials Newspaper​

 

[Flanders]

I’m beginning to think that the Administration has plans to crucify Je suis Charlie:

Neither President Obama nor Vice President Biden showed up — and in fact, America’s only representative was its relatively unknown and low-profile ambassador to France.

Obama and Biden had empty public schedules Sunday, but the White House declined to comment on why they didn’t go.​

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Published: Sunday, January 11, 2015, 2:18 PM
Updated: Monday, January 12, 2015, 9:50 AM

Eric Holder U.S. officials no-shows at Paris unity rally - NY Daily News​

For those who are not following the political cartoon explosion that blew up in the president’s face:

Prof. Geoffrey Pullum (Language Log) points out:

The inspiration [for the Je suis Charlie slogan], obviously, is the famous “I’m Spartacus” scene in Stanley Kubrick’s 1960 movie Spartacus. But Je suis Charlie is unlike I’m Spartacus in one respect: it’s ambiguous. The verb être (“be”) and the verb suivre (“follow”) share the first-person singular present tense form suis, so Je suis Charlie can be read either as the mostly intended defiant moi aussi solidarity claim (I am Charlie too, and if you attack the magazine Charlie Hebdo you attack me), or as simply “I follow Charlie.” The two meanings could be intended simultaneously, of course.​

The two French meanings of ‘Je suis Charlie’
By Eugene Volokh January 9

The two French meanings of 8216 Je suis Charlie 8217 - The Washington Post​

Taqiyya the Liar & Company have a third meaning for Je suis Charlie. Muslims have permission to crucify everyone who voices solidarity for freedom over Islamic terrorism:

I m Spartacus - YouTube​

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Bill Maher..

Does anyone take him seriously anymore?

It's where the fucking left get there talking points, and Jon Stewart their news.... Such ICONS and you've forgotten one of your 2 sources!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

and this Flanders poster is ier than

 

[whitehall]

Where was the Star Wars bar scene aka the U.N. when the liberal art community held a show featuring the Christian Virgin Mary covered in animal dung and Jesus on the Cross upside down in a vat of urine? Christians were angry but since they are civilized, nobody died.