deanrd
Gold Member
- May 8, 2017
- 29,411
- 3,634
- 290
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
So your argument is destroy the environment?Democrats took away coal mining jobs?Those are what are knows as "pockets".It's actually quite simple.
Republicans are proud of how long they were in office and how valuable they were to billionaires and corporations.
Democrats are proud of the number of poor and Middle Class Americans they helped.
Chicago, Detroit and Baltimore are fine examples.
Shall I go on?
Now, when you look at the enormous area called Appalachia, which covers 13 states, the home of millions of poor whites, many addicted to narcotics, many unemployed, way too much crime, teenage pregnancies, drop outs.
You have to admit, the right wing's obsession with a few square blocks in a couple of cities when here is a disaster zone covering 13 states is quite bizarre. In fact, it's gotten so horrible, infant mortality has risen sharply and people in the region are dying at a much younger age than in the rest of the country.
infant mortality rising in Appalachia
Darker blue is where people are dying younger and younger.
It's pitiful,
just
pitiful.
dying younger in Appalachia
So please, explain to me this right wing obsession with a few blocks in a couple of cities when they totally ignore their own base of voters.
Anyone?Those are what are knows as "pockets".It's actually quite simple.
Republicans are proud of how long they were in office and how valuable they were to billionaires and corporations.
Democrats are proud of the number of poor and Middle Class Americans they helped.
Chicago, Detroit and Baltimore are fine examples.
Shall I go on?
Now, when you look at the enormous area called Appalachia, which covers 13 states, the home of millions of poor whites, many addicted to narcotics, many unemployed, way too much crime, teenage pregnancies, drop outs.
You have to admit, the right wing's obsession with a few square blocks in a couple of cities when here is a disaster zone covering 13 states is quite bizarre. In fact, it's gotten so horrible, infant mortality has risen sharply and people in the region are dying at a much younger age than in the rest of the country.
infant mortality rising in Appalachia
Darker blue is where people are dying younger and younger.
It's pitiful,
just
pitiful.
dying younger in Appalachia
So please, explain to me this right wing obsession with a few blocks in a couple of cities when they totally ignore their own base of voters.
Anyone?
Uhm does Democrats taking away their coal mining jobs have anything to do with it Rderp?
And what's this defeltion from your home town of Chicago of blacks killing each other in the streets?
Sounds like a punchline. It would sound more serious if it were true.
Robotics, driverless tech are taking over mining jobs
This truck is the size of a house and doesn’t have a driver
Coal Mining Jobs Trump Would Bring Back No Longer Exist
Oops, doesn't sound like Democrats to me.
Chicago named one of safest cities in the world
Republicans cling so to their ignorance that when they least expect it, facts pop up and bitch slap the sh!t out of them.
Lmfao....so take a bus right now to the corner of 26th west Street and 2700 California South avenue in Chicago tell us if you will make it out alive?
Dumb fuck
And now the lefts 40 years war on coal
'Junk science'? Studies behind Obama regulations under fire
Harvard Study
The Obama administration’s EPA used the 1993 Harvard Six Cities Study to justify air quality regulations on particulate matter, or particles of pollution in the air. The regulations—linked to devastating the coal industry—also affect automobiles, power plants and factories.
In 2013 the House Science, Space and Technology Committee subpoenaed the EPA for data from the study, which links particulate air pollution to infant mortality.
'The American people should be confident that when agencies regulate, they rely on up-to-date, accurate, and unbiased information.'
- Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla.
But in 2014, then-EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy told the committee the agency couldn’t produce either the Harvard study or information from a 1994 American Cancer Society study—claiming the EPA didn’t own the information.
Clever.