Car violence DWARFS gun violence

Actually...when a car hits a bus, the result is usually the occupants of the car dead, and the people on the bus bruised and a little shaken up.

What happens is the bus tries to avoid the drunk driver in the car and loses control and rolls the truck and 20 die. But the libs say - we don't care, only gun deaths count.
 
In 1974 america lowered the speed limit to 55 and immediately annual highway deaths dropped by 9,000. That's right, 9,000 lives saved by such a small act - and no unintended consequences. If liberals want to save lives why don't they demand that instead of screaming for a super-extreme measure like banning guns that might do some good but would also do a lot of harm?
 
That's because (wait for it) the number of miles-driven ALSO plummeted.

Unintended consequences were widespread: in addition to making Mike Valentine a millionaire, it fostered widespread contempt for traffic laws.
 
That's because (wait for it) the number of miles-driven ALSO plummeted.

.

That's a lie and you know it cuz i've spoken of this before. Highway miles dropped 2% while fatalities dropped 16%. The board awaits your apology.
 
Guns exist to kill something.
They were/are designed for that.

Cars are designed to be transportation and have quite a few safety features to help keep them from being killers.

Thems the facts.
 
Guns exist to kill something.
They were/are designed for that.

Cars are designed to be transportation and have quite a few safety features to help keep them from being killers.

Thems the facts.

HAHAHA. The fact is americans do far more killing with cars than with guns. Mind you cars are not the problem - the problem is all the reckless drivers that we tolerate. Even encourage.

THINK
 
Drunk driving should also be a felony and carry a license suspension of 5 yrs plus. Why do we coddle these killers? Because obozo wants to. His father was a serial DUI who once killed a man by drunk driving!
there is such thing as felony DUI and you can be charged with murder by using your car as the weapon.
 
Guns exist to kill something.
They were/are designed for that.

Cars are designed to be transportation and have quite a few safety features to help keep them from being killers.

Thems the facts.

HAHAHA. The fact is americans do far more killing with cars than with guns. Mind you cars are not the problem - the problem is all the reckless drivers that we tolerate. Even encourage.

THINK
cars are rarely used in the premeditated murder of a person.

do you have any stats supporting your claim?
 
In 1974 america lowered the speed limit to 55 and immediately annual highway deaths dropped by 9,000. That's right, 9,000 lives saved by such a small act - and no unintended consequences. If liberals want to save lives why don't they demand that instead of screaming for a super-extreme measure like banning guns that might do some good but would also do a lot of harm?
obviously you lack the ability to understand an argument. most everyone on the left talks about "gun control" not "gun elimination." however whenever someone on the right hears the word gun control, they immediately interpret this to be gun elimination.
 
Sober and drunk drivers kill other people every year...their connection, cars.

So liberals ban cars since drunk drivers and sober drivers kill people on purpose and by accident.
 
Sober and drunk drivers kill other people every year...their connection, cars.

So liberals ban cars since drunk drivers and sober drivers kill people on purpose and by accident.
again, you go straight to the gun ban. no one is talking about a complete gun ban, however gun control is the topic. try to stay on point.

again, can you define the purpose of a gun vs the purpose of a car? guns serve no other purpose than to kill things.
 
So tell us about cars vs guns in the US Constitution....

Sober and drunk drivers kill other people every year...their connection, cars.

So liberals ban cars since drunk drivers and sober drivers kill people on purpose and by accident.
again, you go straight to the gun ban. no one is talking about a complete gun ban, however gun control is the topic. try to stay on point.

again, can you define the purpose of a gun vs the purpose of a car? guns serve no other purpose than to kill things.
 
So tell us about cars vs guns in the US Constitution....

Sober and drunk drivers kill other people every year...their connection, cars.

So liberals ban cars since drunk drivers and sober drivers kill people on purpose and by accident.
again, you go straight to the gun ban. no one is talking about a complete gun ban, however gun control is the topic. try to stay on point.

again, can you define the purpose of a gun vs the purpose of a car? guns serve no other purpose than to kill things.
actually the constitution does not define "arms", but the "right to bear arms" by definition is the right to carry arms, not the right to purchase arms.

and you brought up the argument of the car vs. the gun, i just asked you to defend it. but instead to deflect the conversation away from it. typical wing nut.....
 
You're not guranteed the right to drive a car....but let's see what happens to you if you try to steal a gun from a law abiding citizen.

Since you are a dumbfuck and clearly can't get the point....you're now being ignored.

So tell us about cars vs guns in the US Constitution....

again, you go straight to the gun ban. no one is talking about a complete gun ban, however gun control is the topic. try to stay on point.

again, can you define the purpose of a gun vs the purpose of a car? guns serve no other purpose than to kill things.
actually the constitution does not define "arms", but the "right to bear arms" by definition is the right to carry arms, not the right to purchase arms.

and you brought up the argument of the car vs. the gun, i just asked you to defend it. but instead to deflect the conversation away from it. typical wing nut.....
 
You're not guranteed the right to drive a car....but let's see what happens to you if you try to steal a gun from a law abiding citizen.

Since you are a dumbfuck and clearly can't get the point....you're now being ignored.

So tell us about cars vs guns in the US Constitution....
actually the constitution does not define "arms", but the "right to bear arms" by definition is the right to carry arms, not the right to purchase arms.

and you brought up the argument of the car vs. the gun, i just asked you to defend it. but instead to deflect the conversation away from it. typical wing nut.....
typical wing nut response. cant even defend his own argument.
 
Guns exist to kill something.
They were/are designed for that.

Cars are designed to be transportation and have quite a few safety features to help keep them from being killers.

Thems the facts.

HAHAHA. The fact is americans do far more killing with cars than with guns. Mind you cars are not the problem - the problem is all the reckless drivers that we tolerate. Even encourage.

THINK

Hey dumbfuck, you can kill anyone with anything.

The difference between semi-automatics and anything is that semis serve one purpose to society: to kill lots of people easily in a very short amount of time.

Everything else serves another purpose to society, however negligible.

Enough with the dumb car analogy. Time for you to THINK shit fer brains.
 
there is such thing as felony DUI and you can be charged with murder by using your car as the weapon.

I know some DUIs are charged with a felony but it's very rare. It needs to be automatic in every case. Drunk driving is a super-violent crime and only psychopaths do it.
 
[
obviously you lack the ability to understand an argument. most everyone on the left talks about "gun control" not "gun elimination." however whenever someone on the right hears the word gun control, they immediately interpret this to be gun elimination.

You don't understand the argument. No one, certainly not me, wants to eliminate cars. But we all should want more car control. Like lower speed limits and much stiffer penalties for speeding and DUI.
 

Forum List

Back
Top