Capitalists are warmongers - France now withdrawing from Afg

[BlackAsCoal]

what a bunch of horseshit. War has nothing to do with capitalism. It has been started by political and economical systems of all colors with the worst of them certainly not in capitalist societies.

:0) wow

Exactly how many wars are the capiltalists engaged in right now compared to other forms of government.

I bet you don't even know how many conflicts and wars we're engaged in.

 

[Katzndogz]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

 

[G.T.]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

That's because the unintelligent can only win liberty through blood because - they're unintelligent. War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

 

[Artevelde]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

That's because the unintelligent can only win liberty through blood because - they're unintelligent. War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

So you agree that war is sometimes necessary and justified?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

I'm a socialist .. which means "people first" .. which is what France is attempting.

Indeed...people first to suffer, people first to starve, people first to stand in line to get the most basic needs, people first...

You are indeed what you seem.

Unintelligent.

:0)

That is your problem...what you can't understand you perceive to be stupid...which is why you live in a capitalist society and are a socialist.
So...when did your parents let you have your computer privileges back?

 

[G.T.]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

That's because the unintelligent can only win liberty through blood because - they're unintelligent. War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

So you agree that war is sometimes necessary and justified?

It's not "agree", because he said ALWAYS.

I explicity already said SOMETIMES; thus, if you read for comprehension your question was not even necessary and already answered.

 

[BlackAsCoal]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

:0)

What a fun site.

What "liberty" were you defending when we mass-murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis just because we could?

What "liberty" was defended in Vietnam?

Are you still waiting on the "domino effect?" :0)

What "liberty" are we getting our asses kicked in Afghanistan for?

The ONLY liberty associated with any of those mindfuck false wars is the liberty of the military-industrial complex to rape the Treasury and the American taxpayer.

 

[Artevelde]

That's because the unintelligent can only win liberty through blood because - they're unintelligent. War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

So you agree that war is sometimes necessary and justified?

It's not "agree", because he said ALWAYS.

I explicity already said SOMETIMES; thus, if you read for comprehension your question was not even necessary and already answered.

Then why are you so afraid of saying it? Too much of a hypocrite to admit that even you can't deny that some wars are just and justified.

 

[G.T.]

So you agree that war is sometimes necessary and justified?

It's not "agree", because he said ALWAYS.

I explicity already said SOMETIMES; thus, if you read for comprehension your question was not even necessary and already answered.

Then why are you so afraid of saying it? Too much of a hypocrite to admit that even you can't deny that some wars are just and justified.

Hey dumbass, this was posted by ME, BEFORE your question:

War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

 

[BlackAsCoal]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

That's because the unintelligent can only win liberty through blood because - they're unintelligent. War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

BINGO

Post of the day

 

[Artevelde]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

:0)

What a fun site.

What "liberty" were you defending when we mass-murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis just because we could?

What "liberty" was defended in Vietnam?

Are you still waiting on the "domino effect?" :0)

What "liberty" are we getting our asses kicked in Afghanistan for?

The ONLY liberty associated with any of those mindfuck false wars is the liberty of the military-industrial complex to rape the Treasury and the American taxpayer.

What a liar you are.

The US and its allies did not kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's.

As for Vietnam, maybe you should ask the people who fled South Vietnam in such great numbers after the North Vietnamese invasion.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

French socialists have always been surrendering cowards..........no surprise there

Collaborators in some cases even

Those crafty intellectual and cultural elites.................lol

 

[Artevelde]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

That's because the unintelligent can only win liberty through blood because - they're unintelligent. War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

BINGO

Post of the day

Clearly the founders of the US were unintelligent since they could only win through war.

 

[G.T.]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

:0)

What a fun site.

What "liberty" were you defending when we mass-murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis just because we could?

What "liberty" was defended in Vietnam?

Are you still waiting on the "domino effect?" :0)

What "liberty" are we getting our asses kicked in Afghanistan for?

The ONLY liberty associated with any of those mindfuck false wars is the liberty of the military-industrial complex to rape the Treasury and the American taxpayer.

What a liar you are.

The US and its allies did not kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's.

As for Vietnam, maybe you should ask the people who fled South Vietnam in such great numbers after the North Vietnamese invasion.

I'm sure you've done thorough research on the casualties.

Something to show us? Anything at all?

Iraq Body Count

 

[Artevelde]

It's not "agree", because he said ALWAYS.

I explicity already said SOMETIMES; thus, if you read for comprehension your question was not even necessary and already answered.

Then why are you so afraid of saying it? Too much of a hypocrite to admit that even you can't deny that some wars are just and justified.

Hey dumbass, this was posted by ME, BEFORE your question:

War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

It's tough to admit it hey?

 

[G.T.]

That's because the unintelligent can only win liberty through blood because - they're unintelligent. War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

BINGO

Post of the day

Clearly the founders of the US were unintelligent since they could only win through war.

clearly you did not read the entire post for comprehension, where it says that sometimes war is necessary for Liberty. Instead, you took the dishonest and dishonorable route. Clean that up.

 

[G.T.]

Then why are you so afraid of saying it? Too much of a hypocrite to admit that even you can't deny that some wars are just and justified.

Hey dumbass, this was posted by ME, BEFORE your question:

War is only necessary for Liberty SOMETIMES, not "always."

It's tough to admit it hey?

It was admitted in big bold letters, what's so tough seeming? I think it's tough for you to READ, in General. You asked me a question thjat was answered before you asked it, are you dull?

 

[Artevelde]

:0)

What a fun site.

What "liberty" were you defending when we mass-murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis just because we could?

What "liberty" was defended in Vietnam?

Are you still waiting on the "domino effect?" :0)

What "liberty" are we getting our asses kicked in Afghanistan for?

The ONLY liberty associated with any of those mindfuck false wars is the liberty of the military-industrial complex to rape the Treasury and the American taxpayer.

What a liar you are.

The US and its allies did not kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's.

As for Vietnam, maybe you should ask the people who fled South Vietnam in such great numbers after the North Vietnamese invasion.

I'm sure you've done thorough research on the casualties.

Something to show us? Anything at all?

Iraq Body Count

Thank you for documenting my point. About a hundred thousand Iraqi's died in all those years, most of them through attacks by Iraqi's against Iraqi's. Thus, the assertion that the US killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's is a lie.

 

[BlackAsCoal]

Liberty must always be defended with blood. Liberalism on the other hand is the natural state of slaves.

:0)

What a fun site.

What "liberty" were you defending when we mass-murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis just because we could?

What "liberty" was defended in Vietnam?

Are you still waiting on the "domino effect?" :0)

What "liberty" are we getting our asses kicked in Afghanistan for?

The ONLY liberty associated with any of those mindfuck false wars is the liberty of the military-industrial complex to rape the Treasury and the American taxpayer.

What a liar you are.

The US and its allies did not kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's.

As for Vietnam, maybe you should ask the people who fled South Vietnam in such great numbers after the North Vietnamese invasion.

:0)

I thought we had an ageement.

You are dumb people.

I don't give a fuck about what really dumb people think.

Are you not even smart enough to know what the domino effect was supposed to be .. which was not Vietnamese who helped the US fleeing South Vietnam.

Surely there are many other really dumb people here you can talk to without disturbing the adults.

 

[Artevelde]

BINGO

Post of the day

Clearly the founders of the US were unintelligent since they could only win through war.

clearly you did not read the entire post for comprehension, where it says that sometimes war is necessary for Liberty. Instead, you took the dishonest and dishonorable route. Clean that up.

Dishonest is what you are.