Can anyone point to a country that has truly free market capitalism?
How about one that actually practices the tenets of Communism?
No
But Capitalism left to run amok can fall into a system of kleptocrats
Communisim, strong armed idiots
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Can anyone point to a country that has truly free market capitalism?
How about one that actually practices the tenets of Communism?
For communism to even be quasi successful would require total obedience and dictation of every aspect of life..
Communism fails for a reason...
I suppose the biggest reasons are A) people dont like being treated like prisoners and B) humans do a lousy job planning and dictating economies..
Communism and socialism only works with a base of robots, slaves, or prisoners bowing to the state and ruling elite which will ALWAYS exist in such a system(which despite what the kumbaya chanting hippies try to portray as a utopian communist state)
Can anyone point to a country that has truly free market capitalism?
How about one that actually practices the tenets of Communism?
For communism to even be quasi successful would require total obedience and dictation of every aspect of life..
Communism fails for a reason...
I suppose the biggest reasons are A) people dont like being treated like prisoners and B) humans do a lousy job planning and dictating economies..
Communism and socialism only works with a base of robots, slaves, or prisoners bowing to the state and ruling elite which will ALWAYS exist in such a system(which despite what the kumbaya chanting hippies try to portray as a utopian communist state)
" You mean before human nature sets in"
Yes thats what i am trying to compare. Before people can buy they're way to the top of a supposedly "non existant" ladder. But of course in every communist government so far this has happened because of human nature
Going into this i would like to say that i am more on the capitalist end of the spectrum. Though going into this i am generally capitalist knowing the pros and cons of them both may change your own mind. Even though communism was originally a social thing it has also found itself as a government with one man in control. So lets try and picture it with a U.S or near that style democracy.
In essence capitalism is smaller government and communism is huge government. Now before your western instincts tell you to instantly choose capitalism think of the benefits of huge government control in your life.
In communism ideal/original communism everyone is equal. Though it almost never happens that a nation goes completely on the guidelines of a known social policy. Everyone is equal and therefore have the same things to live on and lean on their whole lives. Everyone once again must be equal in society and as a result you lose the right to earn. So in exchange for a lifetime safety net given by the government you give up the ability to earn your way up the ladder. This is because only one social class exist and that is common working class. So you have nothing to look foward to besides that life forever.
It is up to you to decide whether that is a bad or a good thing for you. As a result of this innovation potential is silenced. So is a lifelong safety net really worth losing earning rights and silencing so much potential for innovation?
Now knowing the main gains and losses of communism lets talk about capitalism.
Essentially capitalism is the exact opposite of communism in its original and purest form. In ideal/original capitalism they're is pretty much no government interference in your life. Of course they still have laws as any other nation but if you follow them you are left alone for all of your life. Capitalism is that sweet freedom you taste, love and learn about. In ideal capitalism you can go out and earn it all. You can dream big and dream about the journey there. You can be a bigshot nobody will ever forget. But with that ability to dream big and earn it all you lose that security you had with communism. And if someone earns too much capital they can decide to make everyone else work for dirt cheap money if they choose. They can dominate or without a law from it a monopoly can occur. And if you fail you have nothing to fall back on unless a generous citizen with decent capital decides to help you up.
So is the freedom of capitalism worth the possibility of ending up with nothing?
In conclusion i would like to share my opinion. I belive the risk involved with capitalism is worth the big dreams and potential unlocked that comes with it. People have bigger things to live for and more fuel to live on. Because "the dream" actually exist. In addition to the fact that the world/nation could innovate so much faster.
I would like for you to build an opinion of your own and for you to give me your feedback and for you to discuss amongst youselves.
" You mean before human nature sets in"
Yes thats what i am trying to compare. Before people can buy they're way to the top of a supposedly "non existant" ladder. But of course in every communist government so far this has happened because of human nature
After college I was all for communism. Call it indoctrination of the liberal teachers. However, I thought about it deeply and came to the conclusion it can never work. First, equal is a fantasy. Nothing can be equal because there is not an equal amount of resources. It is a fairy tale to believe everyone can have the same of everything because someone will always have something better. Whether it is lake front property, warmer climate, etc . Everyone can not live on the beach in sunny south Florida or in Hawaii. Then we get to work. Everyone can not have the cushy chair job. Someone has to pick up the trash. Someone has to dive into the sewage tanks and risk hepatitis to clean it. Who is going to do those jobs freely if everything is equal? There is nothing more to gain from doing those jobs. Heck if everyone has the same thing then why work at all? Then the government will have to force people to work and then there goes human rights. The only way communism, socialism, liberalism, etc can truly work is if we lived in the perfect world with the perfect resources and populated with the perfect people. We have none and that is why those forms of government will always fail in the end. Capitalism works because people in the end are greedy and always want more. No matter what form of government you have you will always have the haves and have nots. The only real question is does the individual decide through his own efforts and accomplishments or does the government get to pick the haves?
For communism to even be quasi successful would require total obedience and dictation of every aspect of life..
Communism fails for a reason...
I suppose the biggest reasons are A) people dont like being treated like prisoners and B) humans do a lousy job planning and dictating economies..
Communism and socialism only works with a base of robots, slaves, or prisoners bowing to the state and ruling elite which will ALWAYS exist in such a system(which despite what the kumbaya chanting hippies try to portray as a utopian communist state)
Can anyone point to a country that has truly free market capitalism?
How about one that actually practices the tenets of Communism?
No
But Capitalism left to run amok can fall into a system of kleptocrats
Communisim, strong armed idiots
For communism to even be quasi successful would require total obedience and dictation of every aspect of life..
Communism fails for a reason...
I suppose the biggest reasons are A) people dont like being treated like prisoners and B) humans do a lousy job planning and dictating economies..
Communism and socialism only works with a base of robots, slaves, or prisoners bowing to the state and ruling elite which will ALWAYS exist in such a system(which despite what the kumbaya chanting hippies try to portray as a utopian communist state)
Like monastic orders and consenting collective farms?
I mean in its original form. Like i said, Picture it with democracy, Of course we all know modern communism is absolutely horrible and victimizing. I wouldnt dream of that any day.
You mean... in theory, before human nature gets added in?
Going into this i would like to say that i am more on the capitalist end of the spectrum. Though going into this i am generally capitalist knowing the pros and cons of them both may change your own mind. Even though communism was originally a social thing it has also found itself as a government with one man in control. So lets try and picture it with a U.S or near that style democracy.
In essence capitalism is smaller government and communism is huge government. Now before your western instincts tell you to instantly choose capitalism think of the benefits of huge government control in your life.
In communism ideal/original communism everyone is equal. Though it almost never happens that a nation goes completely on the guidelines of a known social policy. Everyone is equal and therefore have the same things to live on and lean on their whole lives. Everyone once again must be equal in society and as a result you lose the right to earn. So in exchange for a lifetime safety net given by the government you give up the ability to earn your way up the ladder. This is because only one social class exist and that is common working class. So you have nothing to look foward to besides that life forever.
It is up to you to decide whether that is a bad or a good thing for you. As a result of this innovation potential is silenced. So is a lifelong safety net really worth losing earning rights and silencing so much potential for innovation?
Now knowing the main gains and losses of communism lets talk about capitalism.
Essentially capitalism is the exact opposite of communism in its original and purest form. In ideal/original capitalism they're is pretty much no government interference in your life. Of course they still have laws as any other nation but if you follow them you are left alone for all of your life. Capitalism is that sweet freedom you taste, love and learn about. In ideal capitalism you can go out and earn it all. You can dream big and dream about the journey there. You can be a bigshot nobody will ever forget. But with that ability to dream big and earn it all you lose that security you had with communism. And if someone earns too much capital they can decide to make everyone else work for dirt cheap money if they choose. They can dominate or without a law from it a monopoly can occur. And if you fail you have nothing to fall back on unless a generous citizen with decent capital decides to help you up.
So is the freedom of capitalism worth the possibility of ending up with nothing?
In conclusion i would like to share my opinion. I belive the risk involved with capitalism is worth the big dreams and potential unlocked that comes with it. People have bigger things to live for and more fuel to live on. Because "the dream" actually exist. In addition to the fact that the world/nation could innovate so much faster.
I would like for you to build an opinion of your own and for you to give me your feedback and for you to discuss amongst youselves.
Communism, in theory, is great
Communism, in practice, is deadly. Chairman Mao, Stalin are just 2 examples of leaders who's people starved to death in the name of communism.
For communism to even be quasi successful would require total obedience and dictation of every aspect of life..
Communism fails for a reason...
I suppose the biggest reasons are A) people dont like being treated like prisoners and B) humans do a lousy job planning and dictating economies..
Communism and socialism only works with a base of robots, slaves, or prisoners bowing to the state and ruling elite which will ALWAYS exist in such a system(which despite what the kumbaya chanting hippies try to portray as a utopian communist state)
Like monastic orders and consenting collective farms?
For communism to even be quasi successful would require total obedience and dictation of every aspect of life..
Communism fails for a reason...
I suppose the biggest reasons are A) people dont like being treated like prisoners and B) humans do a lousy job planning and dictating economies..
Communism and socialism only works with a base of robots, slaves, or prisoners bowing to the state and ruling elite which will ALWAYS exist in such a system(which despite what the kumbaya chanting hippies try to portray as a utopian communist state)
Like monastic orders and consenting collective farms?