Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you can't fully answer this question, then you do not have an informed opinion about Obama, and therefore have no business in criticizing him.
Come up with 15 dislikes if you are so inclined, but I challenge you to name at least 5 policies of Obama that you agree with.
Yes I can but I'm not going to because of the bolded self serving statement, i.e. "if you can't follow my criteria then you're wrong"..................
Yeah, I'm one of those people that don't enjoy tyranny.
Obama has only violated nearly the entire Bill of Rights.
Really? and in what dimension can presidents just take over a company (Fifth Amendment)???
How about force individuals to buy a product (Fourteenth Amendment)???
How about suing a state (Tenth Amendment)??
Oh and progressives sit there and attempt capitalism is a slippery slope to corporatism, then they support a fucking dictator like Obama who attempted to force people to buy a product or buy his government product and then told his Congress to manifest a ban on conventional light bulbs so GE could corner the market on incandescent light bulbs...
If you can't fully answer this question, then you do not have an informed opinion about Obama, and therefore have no business in criticizing him.
Come up with 15 dislikes if you are so inclined, but I challenge you to name at least 5 policies of Obama that you agree with.
Yes I can but I'm not going to because of the bolded self serving statement, i.e. "if you can't follow my criteria then you're wrong"..................
Or you really don't know. In this case, you are wrong if you can't follow the criteria. It isn't even my criteria. It's called critical thinking.
Yes I can but I'm not going to because of the bolded self serving statement, i.e. "if you can't follow my criteria then you're wrong"..................
Or you really don't know. In this case, you are wrong if you can't follow the criteria. It isn't even my criteria. It's called critical thinking.
So you also set the criteria for what defines critical thinking...........!!!!!
Keep telling yourself that Skippy.
Don't fret yourself, I know but what's really funny is you generally don't see me criticizing anyone but posters who make strange demands, outrageous claims or are just downright partisan in all aspects (ya know, lacking real critical thinking.
But whatchagonnado?
On the contrary, what you are doing is called Control Fixating, yup I understand the concept much better then you do............Or you really don't know. In this case, you are wrong if you can't follow the criteria. It isn't even my criteria. It's called critical thinking.
So you also set the criteria for what defines critical thinking...........!!!!!
Keep telling yourself that Skippy.
Don't fret yourself, I know but what's really funny is you generally don't see me criticizing anyone but posters who make strange demands, outrageous claims or are just downright partisan in all aspects (ya know, lacking real critical thinking.
But whatchagonnado?
On the contrary, what I am seeking is an example of critical thinking. If you can't handle that, then you obviously do not fully understand the concept.
Really? and in what dimension can presidents just take over a company (Fifth Amendment)???
How about force individuals to buy a product (Fourteenth Amendment)???
How about suing a state (Tenth Amendment)??
Oh and progressives sit there and attempt capitalism is a slippery slope to corporatism, then they support a fucking dictator like Obama who attempted to force people to buy a product or buy his government product and then told his Congress to manifest a ban on conventional light bulbs so GE could corner the market on incandescent light bulbs...
If he was so clearly in violation of these amendments, then why is that Obamacare is the only issue that made it to the Supreme Court?
Ok after playing your stupid game and you ignoring me I can say this thread is a scam.
Fuckin' A, Billy..................I'm with you when it comes to supporting Obama, but you sure do have a dickish way about you. I found the way you proposed the topic a bit anticipatory. If you want one or more of these nutters to rise to the occasion, try appealing to the thinkers among them.....instead of feeding the ones who devour such silliness.
Fuckin' A, Billy..................I'm with you when it comes to supporting Obama, but you sure do have a dickish way about you. I found the way you proposed the topic a bit anticipatory. If you want one or more of these nutters to rise to the occasion, try appealing to the thinkers among them.....instead of feeding the ones who devour such silliness.
Yes, it was anticipatory. In truth, I do like getting a rise out of people, but that doesn't change the fact that I asked a fair question.
Ok after playing your stupid game and you ignoring me I can say this thread is a scam.
No, you didn't play the game. I asked for 5 policies. You gave me one: killing bin Laden. If you think that's the only positive thing Obama has done, then you are willfully ignorant.
Stop watching Fox News.
Fuckin' A, Billy..................I'm with you when it comes to supporting Obama, but you sure do have a dickish way about you. I found the way you proposed the topic a bit anticipatory. If you want one or more of these nutters to rise to the occasion, try appealing to the thinkers among them.....instead of feeding the ones who devour such silliness.
Yes, it was anticipatory. In truth, I do like getting a rise out of people, but that doesn't change the fact that I asked a fair question.
You asked a fair question but then proceeded to put conditions on what you would constitute a valid answer..............
Yes, it was anticipatory. In truth, I do like getting a rise out of people, but that doesn't change the fact that I asked a fair question.
You asked a fair question but then proceeded to put conditions on what you would constitute a valid answer..............
No, because it was a fair question, it had fair conditions. Like any OP, you have a choice not to answer the question.
Look, nothing is black and white. My question is about credibility. Just because you are giving policies that you like about a politician, it doesn't necessarily mean you support him/her overall.
If you can't fully answer this question, then you do not have an informed opinion about Obama, and therefore have no business in criticizing him.
You asked a fair question but then proceeded to put conditions on what you would constitute a valid answer..............
No, because it was a fair question, it had fair conditions. Like any OP, you have a choice not to answer the question.
Look, nothing is black and white. My question is about credibility. Just because you are giving policies that you like about a politician, it doesn't necessarily mean you support him/her overall.If you can't fully answer this question, then you do not have an informed opinion about Obama, and therefore have no business in criticizing him.
Yup, fair alright......
at the OP - self-serving crap.
