Can you impeach and entire political party?

the MSM abandoned the Trump/Russia collusion story. Get with the program, loser.

No they didn't. There are now at least 4 active investigations into Trump collusion with Russia that we know about; The Senate Intel Committee, the House Intel Committee, the FBI, and the NY State AG.

If there is nothing to see here, why did Flynn resign? Why did Sessions recuse himself? Why did Nunes recuse himself? Why was Yates canned? None of these are actions of people with nothing to hide.

Lololol

State Department Employee Arrested On Child Porn Charges
 
Like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi who behind closed doors for the first time ever in the history of the US, Forced upon US a healthcare system the majority of people didn't want? Go back to 3rd grade where you belong, as your lack of education is starting to annoy people.

No, Obamacare was not the first piece of legislation done behind closed doors. In fact, Obamacare took about a year from conception to execution and Conservatives had plenty of opportunities to provide input. They just chose not to because they risked a bet on making political obstruction their governing ideology. And it worked. Until they became the ones in charge. It's astonishing that after screeching about Obamacare for seven years, they didn't have a replacement plan ready to go. Why is that?
 
Can you impeach and entire political party?


If we could, the Democrats would have been gone long ago, for repeated and intentional violations of the U.S. Constitution leading to impoverishment and death of large segments of the population.
 
Q. Can you impeach an entire political party

A. No, but the Whig Party imploded and the Republican Party supplanted them (so, the Republican Party has experience in a party doing the wrong thing).

I don't think they'll be impeached.

I do believe a lot of them will be behind bars about 4 years from now.

Dems are mentally ill criminals. The more power they have, the worse they behave.

State Department Employee Arrested On Child Porn Charges

U.S. State Department official caught selling secrets to China

Daniel Rosen, former State Dept. employee, admits to secretly videotaping women
 
Trump has no "approval" authority on the investigations, Hoss.

He cannot interfere with them.
 
I have seen just as much information about the Podesta group working with the same Russian bank and the Clinton foundation benefiting from the Uranium One deal as well as Billy boy having dealings with the Ruskies as I have about Trump.

No, you ahven't seen that. You jsut heard it from the right-wing media that is desperate to push any narrative over the one where Trump and the GOP colluded with Russian spies to influence the election in order to advance Putin's interests at home and abroad.

BTW - Snopes already says you're full of it.
 
The US House can impeach the POTUS per the Constitution and any Federal officer per the US Code Of Federal Statutes.The various States have similar laws."You" (and the mouse in your pocket) cannot do anything like that. You can only vote.

But what happens when the entity that should impeach the President is involved in the conspiracy?

Great question. Don't expect the alt-right morons on this board to give you a rational, intelligent answer, though.
 
Find a different conspiracy theory. This one is washed out. We're on to arresting real spies and traitors. But morons like you aren't interested in that.

Nice attempt at deflection there. But the questions remain. Why was anyone from Trump's team, let alone his *National Security Adviser* colluding with Russian spies at all in the first place????
 
The only collusion with the Russians was by the Obama admin for the last 8 years

Whaaaaaa? Obama put sanctions on Russia. The very same sanctions that Flynn discussed with Kislyak in December 2016. The very same sanctions Sessions, Page, and Manafort were discussing with Russian intelligence throughout the campaign. At this point, it seems like you guys are just lobbing any pile of shit you can find in your cage against the wall, hoping it will stick.
 
The only time Obama gets tough with Russia is right before the opposing political party takes office. Now go figure that. The real question should be, Can we retroactively Impeach the entire Democratic party?

???? Obama put sanctions on Russia. Sanctions your guys opposed and lobbied against! That's what the discussions Flynn, Page, Manafort, and probably Trump himself was having with the Russian spies they were talking to for a couple years.
 
which have failed to justify your original claim, that there was any collusion.

The investigations are being conducted right now, and those who have seen the evidence (including some Republicans) say there was definitely collusion happening.

CNN colluded with Hillary by giving Hillary the debate questions before the debate. CNN tried to influence the election by cheating. Does that bother your hypocritical left wing rear???

What are you blabbing about? What debate? And how is this accusation supposed to be the equivalent of Trump's team colluding with Russian spies to break the law and hack into the DNC e-mails?
 
What Jake? What can you do to stop Putin from flipping all 25 Democrat seats?

The first step is getting Conservatives to admit to themselves that Putin has Trump over a barrel. Probably because of something petty and personal. In the end, Trump isn't going to go down because of his collusion with an enemy of the West. He's probably going to go down because of something stupid and personal, like how he likes to get peed on or some other weird sex thing that he thinks is embarrassing. Maybe his dick size? Who knows?
 
I have seen just as much information about the Podesta group working with the same Russian bank and the Clinton foundation benefiting from the Uranium One deal as well as Billy boy having dealings with the Ruskies as I have about Trump.

No, you ahven't seen that. You jsut heard it from the right-wing media that is desperate to push any narrative over the one where Trump and the GOP colluded with Russian spies to influence the election in order to advance Putin's interests at home and abroad.

BTW - Snopes already says you're full of it.

Snopes is unreliable.

Sorry buddy, it's true.

I didn't read it in "right-wing media," unless you consider the NEW YORK TIMES, right wing media.

Pay attention to what is going on in the world.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

24JPURANIUM1-master315.jpg

Frank Giustra, right, a mining financier, has donated $31.3 million to the foundation run by former President Bill Clinton, left.

If you believe the Clintons' explanations and excuses, but not Trump's? You are being partisan and clueless.
 
It is hard for me to believe that the GOP had no idea of the collusion between Trump and Russia. Not when Trump's eventual Chief-of-Staff, Reince Priebus, ran the RNC before taking the job in the White House. How could the RNC and by extension, the RSCC, the RCCC, Pence, McConnell, Ryan, McCarthy, Fox News, right-wing media, all of them not know or be a party to this? I am through giving them the benefit of the doubt. These people are compromised by Russian intelligence until they can prove otherwise. In the meantime, the entire agenda from Trump and the GOP should be put on indefinite hold until we can figure out what the hell is going on!!


While there is no proof of collusion, as hard as you've tried, it's rather clear Trump and Putin do not like each other to the point of pounding chests, and possible showdowns. Your ridiculous party needs to shut up and sit down. Here's why:
Collusion ran rampant among Putin, Obama and Hitlery. And it is proven. Obama even made a point of letting Putin know that once he didn't have to worry about Americans voting him out for selling Putin our uranium mines he could be more flexible with Putin. < Do you want to hear the words come out of Obama's mouth? Because you can. Oh, and it wouldn't hurt to drop some change in the Clinton Go Fund Me/Money Laundering Foundation for those mines, and pay Bill $500,000 to croak out a 20 minute speech.....

http://video-cdn.abcnews.com/120326_abc_obama_medvedev.mp4

Remove that log first, and we'll talk about impeaching a President based on the fact that you're mad that he won.
 
Last edited:
Snopes is unreliable.

No, it's not. Conservatives are unreliable. They said tax cuts would pay for themselves (they didn't). They said deregulation would be good for the economy (it wasn't). They said Saddam had WMDs (he didn't). They said Obamacare would kill jobs (it didn't). They said letting the Bush Tax Cuts expire for the top bracket would lead to a recession (it didn't). They said there would be hyperinflation in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 (it didn't). Pick any subject and chances are, Conservatives are wrong about it.

So that begs the question; why the fuck should we take anything you people say seriously?
 
I have seen just as much information about the Podesta group working with the same Russian bank and the Clinton foundation benefiting from the Uranium One deal as well as Billy boy having dealings with the Ruskies as I have about Trump.

No, you ahven't seen that. You jsut heard it from the right-wing media that is desperate to push any narrative over the one where Trump and the GOP colluded with Russian spies to influence the election in order to advance Putin's interests at home and abroad.

BTW - Snopes already says you're full of it.

Snopes is unreliable.

Sorry buddy, it's true.

I didn't read it in "right-wing media," unless you consider the NEW YORK TIMES, right wing media.

Pay attention to what is going on in the world.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

24JPURANIUM1-master315.jpg

Frank Giustra, right, a mining financier, has donated $31.3 million to the foundation run by former President Bill Clinton, left.

If you believe the Clintons' explanations and excuses, but not Trump's? You are being partisan and clueless.
As far as links between Russia and the Podesta group?

Do you consider the Associated Press "right-wing media?"

AP Sources: Manafort tied to undisclosed foreign lobbying
AP Sources: Manafort tied to undisclosed foreign lobbying
People involved in the lobbying project offered contradictory descriptions of how it came about.


Podesta told the AP his firm worked closely with the nonprofit and with Gates simultaneously. But Podesta said Gates was not working for Yanukovych's political party and said Manafort was not involved.


"I was never given any reason to believe Rick was a Party of Regions consultant," said John Ward Anderson, a current Podesta employee who attended the meeting, in a statement provided by his firm. "My assumption was that he was working for the Centre, as we were."


Gates, in contrast, told AP he was working with Manafort and that both he and Manafort were working for Yanukovych's party.


Pointing to Manafort's involvement, Weber told AP that Manafort discussed the project before it began in a conference call with Podesta and himself.


The director of the European Centre, Ina Kirsch, told the AP her group never worked with Manafort or Gates and said the group hired the Washington lobbyists on its own. She said she had met with Manafort twice but said neither Manafort nor Gates played a role in its lobbying activities.


The center has declined for years to reveal specific sources of its funding.


As you can see, the Republicans and Democrats are all in this together.
 
While there is no proof of collusion, as hard as you've tried, it's rather clear Trump and Putin do not like each other to the point of pounding chests, and possible showdowns. Your ridiculous party needs to shut up and sit down.

Are you kidding? Have you ever heard of "posturing" before? How about "wagging the dog"? That's what this Syria nonsense is all about. If Putin didn't like Trump, he wouldn't have held court with Tillerson. He wouldn't have worked so hard to have his troll army use Russian Active Measures during the campaign. Look who is pushing the narrative of possible showdowns with Russia; all the people who were previously singing Putin's praises during the campaign. It's just another Russian Active Measure being employed by Conservatives that suckers like you buy into because you cannot bring yourself to admit you made a YUGE mistake voting for Trump and the GOP. These people have lied to you for so long...why are you still believing them!?!?




Collusion ran rampant among Putin, Obama and Hitlery. And it is proven.

No, it's not. Obama put sanctions on Russia. Sanctions that you guys opposed and lobbied against. Snopes says you're FOS, BTW.
 

Forum List

Back
Top