Can we reduce Carbon emissions?

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Skull Pilot, Dec 3, 2009.

  1. Skull Pilot
    Offline

    Skull Pilot Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Messages:
    31,817
    Thanks Received:
    4,499
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +10,100
    Now Obama in his ill advised Waman cap and tax scheme wants a better than 80% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050.

    That would mean reducing carbon emissions in to a level not seen in 1910. But since we are a more populous country now, it would mean a per-capita reduction of emissions to a level not seen since 1875.

    Does anyone believe this is possible?

    In 1875, there were no cars, no planes, no electricity and most people's carbon emissions came from heating their homes with wood or possibly coal.

    So is it realistic to mandate an impossible standard?

    Face it folks this is not a plan for environmental policy it is nothing but yet another government scheme to separate us from our money and to exert more control over our lives.
     
  2. FactFinder
    Offline

    FactFinder VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,641
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +237
    We still have not answered the question as to whether we need to.
     
  3. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,395
    Waxman-Markey is only half the picture. Bamster intends to tax domestic hydrocarbon production by tens of billions of dollars, then plow the money into "green" tech and jobs. U.S. production will plummet, industry jobs will be lost, and imports will go up.
     
  4. waltky
    Offline

    waltky Wise ol' monkey Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    20,873
    Thanks Received:
    1,791
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Okolona, KY
    Ratings:
    +3,884
    China leads the way in carbon emissions...
    :eusa_eh:
    Carbon emissions hit record high
    Tue, Jun 11, 2013 - China led a rise in global carbon dioxide emissions to a record high last year, more than offsetting falls in the US and Europe, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said yesterday.
    See also:

    IEA warns carbon emission rising beyond desirable levels
    Monday 10th June, 2013 - The world is not on track to limit the global temperature increase to a desirable level of 2 degrees Celsius, the International Energy Agency (IEA) Monday said urging governments to swiftly enact energy policies to keep alive climate goals without harming economic growth.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2013
  5. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,395
    China's the best thing to happen to the USEPA.
     
  6. Saigon
    Offline

    Saigon Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,434
    Thanks Received:
    870
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Ratings:
    +1,240
    I think 80% is unlikely, but there is no question at all that the US could cut emissions by 20% - 30% and actively improve economic performance as it goes.

    We see this happening quite naturally and through private companies around the world, so there is no reason for the US to continue to be left behind because of politics.

    If every American home, office and shop had adequate insulation, the savings would be absolutely enormous, and the people saving would be normal, working families.

    If every American home, office and shop were equipped with solar water heating, photo-voltaic panels, heat exchange pumps or ground-heating systems where appropriate, the savings would be staggering.
     
  7. Saigon
    Offline

    Saigon Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,434
    Thanks Received:
    870
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Ratings:
    +1,240
    Well, did we need to stop using the steam engine?

    Technologies move forwards; and opposing newer, cleaner, more efficient and cheaper forms on energy because you do not politcally approve of what scientists are telling you doesn't make much sense.
     
  8. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,395
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,243
    Thanks Received:
    2,916
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,240
    A moot thread.......zero chance of any significant carbon legislation any time soon. They'll pass some BS token gesture to the k00ks later this year or early next.....but Cap and Trade is dead.
     
  10. martybegan
    Online

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,436
    Thanks Received:
    4,009
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +11,001
    We got rid of the steam engine (for most applications, not all) because its replacements were either better, cheaper, easier to maintain or smaller.

    What we have now is going backwards, away from the efficiency of centralization of energy production, away from higher energy densities, and away from maintaining our standard of living, all to the altar of AGW.

    And its not the scientists I worry about, its the statist politicians who use AGW as an excuse to increase government powers at the expense of my liberties.
     

Share This Page