Can the skeptics please prove this data wrong?

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Matthew, Dec 27, 2010.

  1. Matthew
    Online

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,733
    Thanks Received:
    4,604
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,180
    Can the skeptics please prove this data wrong?

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    Prove this wrong...Is it wrong?:confused: Please, I beg of you to blow holes in this the size of the grand fucking cannon. End the debate and kill the theory of global warming as a fraud.

    If you can't disprove it then offer another theory and give support to why you believe that theory works and why.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2010
  2. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,234
    Thanks Received:
    2,915
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,232
    The global warming faithers like Matthew always screw up the real question...............

    The global warming faithers violate the principle pillar of all science:
    For something to be scientifically true, you must be able to test it to see if it's false. That's what scientific experimentation and observation do. That's the essence of the scientific method...............which the faithers are not at all interested in. Never have been.

    Thus, we have skeptics...........
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,234
    Thanks Received:
    2,915
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,232
    Cant wait for West to get in this thread...........:party:
     
  4. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,234
    Thanks Received:
    2,915
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,232
  5. mdn2000
    Offline

    mdn2000 BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,766
    Thanks Received:
    278
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    conservative hell california
    Ratings:
    +278
    Its a simpleton graph you have not linked to, how about starting with a link. Pictures and Graphs are really the argument of morons, of course I should of waited for the link but I gander to say the link will prove you misunderstand the significance of the microsoft paint graph you present as debate.
     
  6. mdn2000
    Offline

    mdn2000 BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,766
    Thanks Received:
    278
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    conservative hell california
    Ratings:
    +278
    Maybe i should of said show the data, not the con job.

    Where is the link to the data. How do we prove how foolish you are without the Data.
     
  7. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    sorry, but that isnt how it works
    YOU prove it RIGHT
     
  8. Matthew
    Online

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,733
    Thanks Received:
    4,604
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,180


    I just wanted you to blow holes in this data Eight great figures summarizing the evidence for a “human fingerprint” on recent climate change Climate Progress

    Attack the data not the messager.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2010
  9. Matthew
    Online

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,733
    Thanks Received:
    4,604
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,180
    I'm a moderate within this debate and don't believe in the extremism of most of the hard core...But will admit that our planet has been warming and that the data showing the level of out going heat decreasing as pretty solid support for a strengthening green house like effect. Please point out why this is wrong. Also the stratosphere has been cooling and troposphere has been warming...Which is also support for the theory.
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2010
  10. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    the climate is always changing, its proven throughout history
    the debate is really is Man making it worse
    we dont have enough actual empirical data on that to say either way
    only the fanatics are willing to claim it is
     

Share This Page