Can the New York Times "see" Itself?

[DGS49]

Do they realize how ridiculous they appear?

Day after day after day after day, headlining one negative, slanderous story about Trump after another?

Even if they would all be factual and true (which is obviously not the case), the Paper still looks positively buffoonish in pushing this monotonous, self-embarrassing excuse for reporting. Can they see that nobody outside the delusional Left (sorry for the redundancy) is reading this shit? (One cannot help but read the headlines).

In the latest salvo, they expended literally thousands of man-hours developing a "story" that purports to show that the Trump family took serious measures to minimize its collective tax burden. Who knew?

And that The Donald derived a lot of income from the family business...more than he has claimed, if the story is corroborated. I am FUCKING SHOCKED!

And of course the New York Attorney General - that bastion of integrity - is frantically trying to find a way to capitalize, both politically and financially, on anything dredged up by the Times. Good luck with that one.

And I'm not even talking about the Editorial Page, where everyone expects a continuous slurry of Leftist drivel. Go for it. Where you admit that it's just your opinion, you are perfectly entitled to state the predictable thoughts for which the Paper has been known for decades.

But Journalism itself takes a hit when this most respected of Papers prints such repetitive garbage, day after day.

 

[toobfreak]

Do they realize how ridiculous they appear?

Day after day after day after day, headlining one negative, slanderous story about Trump after another?

Even if they would all be factual and true (which is obviously not the case), the Paper still looks positively buffoonish in pushing this monotonous, self-embarrassing excuse for reporting. Can they see that nobody outside the delusional Left (sorry for the redundancy) is reading this shit? (One cannot help but read the headlines).

In the latest salvo, they expended literally thousands of man-hours developing a "story" that purports to show that the Trump family took serious measures to minimize its collective tax burden. Who knew?

And that The Donald derived a lot of income from the family business...more than he has claimed, if the story is corroborated. I am FUCKING SHOCKED!

And of course the New York Attorney General - that bastion of integrity - is frantically trying to find a way to capitalize, both politically and financially, on anything dredged up by the Times. Good luck with that one.

And I'm not even talking about the Editorial Page, where everyone expects a continuous slurry of Leftist drivel. Go for it. Where you admit that it's just your opinion, you are perfectly entitled to state the predictable thoughts for which the Paper has been known for decades.

But Journalism itself takes a hit when this most respected of Papers prints such repetitive garbage, day after day.

Even those reporting these heinous news admit when listened to carefully that most of it is just aggressively good business using tax laws to avoid paying unnecessary taxes and that only a very small tiny bit of it can even be legitimately questioned as being possibly illegal. The real question here is why do we have a tax law system in the first place where unless you know how to dance around a million circuitous tax laws, you'll end up OVER-paying your taxes?

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Do they realize how ridiculous they appear?

Day after day after day after day, headlining one negative, slanderous story about Trump after another?

Even if they would all be factual and true (which is obviously not the case), the Paper still looks positively buffoonish in pushing this monotonous, self-embarrassing excuse for reporting. Can they see that nobody outside the delusional Left (sorry for the redundancy) is reading this shit? (One cannot help but read the headlines).

In the latest salvo, they expended literally thousands of man-hours developing a "story" that purports to show that the Trump family took serious measures to minimize its collective tax burden. Who knew?

And that The Donald derived a lot of income from the family business...more than he has claimed, if the story is corroborated. I am FUCKING SHOCKED!

And of course the New York Attorney General - that bastion of integrity - is frantically trying to find a way to capitalize, both politically and financially, on anything dredged up by the Times. Good luck with that one.

And I'm not even talking about the Editorial Page, where everyone expects a continuous slurry of Leftist drivel. Go for it. Where you admit that it's just your opinion, you are perfectly entitled to state the predictable thoughts for which the Paper has been known for decades.

But Journalism itself takes a hit when this most respected of Papers prints such repetitive garbage, day after day.

What else would you expect when Third parties are trying to get you inline to vote. Example: The New York Times announced in July. Besides, the media outlet has also been recently listed among the tycoons’ beneficiaries: Soros has poured $3 million into the HoweveSoros has so far contributed at least $15 million to support Democratic candidates and r, it appears that Soros is not going to give up: “In advance of the midterm elections, newspaper’s stock holdings this year.

 

[Pogo]

Do they realize how ridiculous they appear?

Day after day after day after day, headlining one negative, slanderous story about Trump after another?

Even if they would all be factual and true (which is obviously not the case), the Paper still looks positively buffoonish in pushing this monotonous, self-embarrassing excuse for reporting. Can they see that nobody outside the delusional Left (sorry for the redundancy) is reading this shit? (One cannot help but read the headlines).

In the latest salvo, they expended literally thousands of man-hours developing a "story" that purports to show that the Trump family took serious measures to minimize its collective tax burden. Who knew?

And that The Donald derived a lot of income from the family business...more than he has claimed, if the story is corroborated. I am FUCKING SHOCKED!

And of course the New York Attorney General - that bastion of integrity - is frantically trying to find a way to capitalize, both politically and financially, on anything dredged up by the Times. Good luck with that one.

And I'm not even talking about the Editorial Page, where everyone expects a continuous slurry of Leftist drivel. Go for it. Where you admit that it's just your opinion, you are perfectly entitled to state the predictable thoughts for which the Paper has been known for decades.

But Journalism itself takes a hit when this most respected of Papers prints such repetitive garbage, day after day.

Funny how you have all this to opine about an article you didn't bother to link huh.

Skeered?

Too bad ---- here it is.

 

[DGS49]

Article too long for this crowd.