Can someone show where the Constitution requires the Senate to conduct an impeachment investigation?

[rightwinger]

Trump blocks all investigation, refuses witnesses, won’t release official documents

Then asks.....What obstruction?

 

[Care4all]

who asked the senate to investigate?

no one!

they want witnesses to be able to testify, and the Senate to be able to receive the documents they subpoenaed the administration for in the house but the admin never complied on...

they want new documents and emails acquired AFTER the impeachment due to a watchdog FOIA release to be able to be submitted as supporting evidence in the trial.

AGAIN, NO ONE IS ASKING THE SENATE TO INVESTIGATE!!!

The House Clowns have been at the Senate begging them to investigate for two days.

Where the fuck have you been?

NOPE

they haven't asked them to investigate, unless you are saying that the Managers trying to get the Senators to accept material evidence and material witnesses, of which they have yet to do a final vote on, is what you are calling an investigation???

Investigation, fishing expedition....call it what you want. It isn’t the Senates job to do any of that. Their job is to sit back, listen to the case the House has, and render a verdict. That’s it.

It was on the House to build a case. They failed miserably, and are trying to get a do-over.

prosecutors do not stop building their cases for trial, once they have simply pressed charges....

same thing in impeachment.... prosecutors can continue to gather new evidence, even through the trial.... who told you otherwise, is wrong.

Who is stopping them? The House Clowns can keep looking for evidence. They aren’t, they are begging the Senate to do it for them.

Face it, the House Clowns produced a clusterfuck.

NOPE!

they simply are BEGGING the senators to give them enough votes to PRESENT IT.... takes 51 Senator votes to request it to be submitted and or subpoenaed and or called as a witness etc, according to McConnell's rules

 

[Nostra]

The House Clowns have been at the Senate begging them to investigate for two days.

Where the fuck have you been?

NOPE

they haven't asked them to investigate, unless you are saying that the Managers trying to get the Senators to accept material evidence and material witnesses, of which they have yet to do a final vote on, is what you are calling an investigation???

Investigation, fishing expedition....call it what you want. It isn’t the Senates job to do any of that. Their job is to sit back, listen to the case the House has, and render a verdict. That’s it.

It was on the House to build a case. They failed miserably, and are trying to get a do-over.

prosecutors do not stop building their cases for trial, once they have simply pressed charges....

same thing in impeachment.... prosecutors can continue to gather new evidence, even through the trial.... who told you otherwise, is wrong.

Who is stopping them? The House Clowns can keep looking for evidence. They aren’t, they are begging the Senate to do it for them.

Face it, the House Clowns produced a clusterfuck.

NOPE!

they simply are BEGGING the senators to give them enough votes to PRESENT IT.... takes 51 Senator votes to request it to be submitted and or subpoenaed and or called as a witness etc, according to McConnell's rules

Bullshit. They have 24 hours over 3 days to make their case. Asking to start the subpoena process now is just a political ploy.

Answer this: How many subpoenas did the House Clowns send out during the 33 Days Nazi Pelousy was hiding the Articles of Impeachment?

Zero sound right?

You are being played, you are the low information type Dimwingers rely on. What a rube.

 

[bripat9643]

If Barr had appointed someone to investigate the alleged Trump Ukraine corruption, Trump would fire him, like he did Sessions.

Barr also refused to recuse himself even though he is waste deep in the conspiracy....

Gosh, I'm so tired of this corrupt administration....

He's a stain on the dept of justice....

There is no Trump-Ukraine corruption, moron. What "conspiracy?"

I know you're tired of losing all the time.

bripat, you need to leave this information bubble that you are living in, and see what is going on in the real world every once in a while! Expand your horizon!

By "the real world," did you mean the fantasy land of delusion that you live in?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

Fuck exoneration.

This whole thing is political.

As usual, you are to fucking stupid to see it.

 

[bripat9643]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Republicans would exonerate Trump shooting someone on fifth avenue

If he was a Democrat, yes.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

I can't seem to find it anywhere in the Constitution. It seems to be the responsibility of the House.

So why is Schifferbrains and the rest of Nazi's Clown Brigade over in the Senate right now begging them to do the job of the House?

Nadler is like George Castanza turned up to 11

 

[The Purge]

CAN YOU The party of INFANTICIDE just FEEL the losses you are going to have in the House and Senate, much less the PRESIDENCY With WHAT CANDIDATE?.....PAGING THE MOOOOCHER, The DNC and all those billionaires PROMISE YOU A BILLION DOLLARS if you just say YES, I will be your candidate....please deposit that BILLION in a Kenyan bank, with no contact with America....ROTFLMFAO!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

No evidence for 2 non crimes....and you wonder why your case gets tossed in the trash

 

[Yarddog]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

Its not really a real trial, its a partisan proceeding. If it was a real trial it would have been thrown out by the judge. The prosecution came forward with nothing but hearsay witnesses and one fact witness. They tried to say it was a crime for the Executive branch to assert executive privilege? No single committee has the right to issue warrants as if they were a court of law... the entire House of representatives was not even behind those warrants.
The judge would have thrown this case out long ago had it been a REAL TRIAL... the prosecutors are on record for having political bias against Donald Trump, from the very first week he was elected... there is nothing impartial about these people. If the House voted for impeachment and they did not have all the information, then what was it they even voted on?

 

[The Purge]

 

[BULLDOG]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

No evidence for 2 non crimes....and you wonder why your case gets tossed in the trash

 

[Yarddog]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

No evidence for 2 non crimes....and you wonder why your case gets tossed in the trash

They were after him for Russian Collusion... Trump was a clear and present danger.... yet not one American was indicted for colluding with Russians after millions of dollars and thousands of documents. If Russian collusion was true, there would have been at least one... one person in the trail of corruption nailed for Russian collusion. But No, and it only made the Democrats want Trump more.

Now its abuse of power and obstruction of democrats in the House... one thing after another and another, secret whistle blowers, disgruntled carreer diplomats, just people who dont like the way Trump does things and want to criminalize him.

This is exactly why the founders made it hard to impeach a president, they knew someday one faction of the government would go off the rails in pursuit of power. This time around its the Democrats

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

No evidence for 2 non crimes....and you wonder why your case gets tossed in the trash

So, where's the "evidence"? Did McConnell hide it after the Stalinist democrats presented it?

 

[The Purge]

Democrats will continue to whine about not having witnesses while Trump is completely exonerated.

Without witnesses, there can be no exoneration. He might be able to say he won the political battle in a scam trial, but it will take evidence to exonerate him.

You mean all the witnesses that Dems claimed made a rock solid impeachment case weren't the right witnesses?
Did the Dems scam the country?

You Trump party idiots have made it clear that you won't accept what has already been found, even before it has been presented in the trial. Don't expect the democratic party to just roll over and accept your sham trial.

No evidence for 2 non crimes....and you wonder why your case gets tossed in the trash

 

[The Purge]

Five (state) Republican Attorneys General announce action asking the Senate to reject articles of impeachment.

 

[The Purge]

(THIS LINKS WITH THE NEW INFO LAURA INGRAHAM DROPPED TONIGHT - )

VIDEO AT Ingraham investigation: Emails expose what Obama admin knew about Bidens and Burisma

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This explains it. Anti-Trump CIA whistleblower Eric Ciaramella filed his second-hand “whistleblower” complaint against President Trump after speaking with Adam Schiff’s team in September.

Ciaramella claimed he was concerned about President Trump’s discussion of Hunter Biden during his call with Ukrainian President Zelensky.

Now we know why Ciaramella was so concerned. According to White House visitor logs Eric Ciaramella was hosting the January 19, 2016 White House meeting where Ukrainian officials were told to drop the investigation into Hunter Biden.

* * * * * * * * * * *

Investigative reporter John Solomon at The Hill reported in April on the January 2016 meeting between Ukrainian officials and Obama officials at the White House.

The other case raised at the January 2016 meeting, Telizhenko said, involved Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company under investigation in Ukraine for improper foreign transfers of money. At the time, Burisma allegedly was paying then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter as both a board member and a consultant. More than $3 million flowed from Ukraine to an American firm tied to Hunter Biden in 2014-15, bank records show.

According to Telizhenko, U.S. officials told the Ukrainians they would prefer that Kiev drop the Burisma probe and allow the FBI to take it over. The Ukrainians did not agree. But then Joe Biden pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire Ukraine’s chief prosecutor in March 2016, as I previously reported. The Burisma case was transferred to NABU, then shut down.

According to Stephen McIntyre the demand that Ukrainian top prosecutor Viktor Shokin be fired as a condition for IMF loan almost certainly originated with Biden staff. The demand was first announced to Ukrainian prosecutors at a January..

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com

 

[lantern2814]

The House Clowns have been at the Senate begging them to investigate for two days.

Where the fuck have you been?

NOPE

they haven't asked them to investigate, unless you are saying that the Managers trying to get the Senators to accept material evidence and material witnesses, of which they have yet to do a final vote on, is what you are calling an investigation???

Investigation, fishing expedition....call it what you want. It isn’t the Senates job to do any of that. Their job is to sit back, listen to the case the House has, and render a verdict. That’s it.

It was on the House to build a case. They failed miserably, and are trying to get a do-over.

prosecutors do not stop building their cases for trial, once they have simply pressed charges....

same thing in impeachment.... prosecutors can continue to gather new evidence, even through the trial.... who told you otherwise, is wrong.

Who is stopping them? The House Clowns can keep looking for evidence. They aren’t, they are begging the Senate to do it for them.

Face it, the House Clowns produced a clusterfuck.

NOPE!

they simply are BEGGING the senators to give them enough votes to PRESENT IT.... takes 51 Senator votes to request it to be submitted and or subpoenaed and or called as a witness etc, according to McConnell's rules

Lying as usual. Maybe YOU need to actually get back to reality and quit swallowing the Dim idiocy. But that’s likely asking too much. So now the House isn’t allowed to present their evidence? You know you sound stupid here right?

 

[WEATHER53]

Just hilarious that Dems want Senate to do their work for them or it’s not “fair trial”