Can somebody please direct me to the "clean forum" rule?

[koshergrl]

I just heard of it today. I have no idea where it's hidden.

 

[Jos]

Probably near the kitchen, and make me a sammich too

http://www.usmessageboard.com/clean-debate-zone/

 

[theDoctorisIn]

You're right, it's very well hidden.

 

[catzmeow]

Is it true that neg reps are not allowed in the CDZ, but positive reps are?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Is it true that neg reps are not allowed in the CDZ, but positive reps are?

That is true.

 

[catzmeow]

Is it true that neg reps are not allowed in the CDZ, but positive reps are?

That is true.

That seems somewhat inequitable. Why not just eliminate reps entirely for that zone?

 

[hortysir]

Is it true that neg reps are not allowed in the CDZ, but positive reps are?

That is true.

That seems somewhat inequitable. Why not just eliminate reps entirely for that zone?

Rather than Neg-Rep, in that zone, why not just debate your point without being an asshole about it?


Too difficult?

Steer clear.


Simple, really

 

[koshergrl]

Go rep Boop, you know you're dying to.

 

[hortysir]

Go rep Boop, you know you're dying to.

= too difficult



got it

 

[koshergrl]

Not at all. I'll kick her ass when everybody's done licking it.

Right now what I see is her posing really poorly constructed bashes, telling anyone who presents a good argument against her that they're breaking the rules, and a bunch of like-minded morons telling her how wonderful it is to have some *real* debate.

 

[manifold]

Is it true that neg reps are not allowed in the CDZ, but positive reps are?

That is true.

That seems somewhat inequitable. Why not just eliminate reps entirely for that zone?

If you really dave, here is what you do:

Find a post by the offending party outside the CDZ and neg rep it, but make sure to include a link back the the CDZ post it was in response to.

 

[Wiseacre]

That is true.

That seems somewhat inequitable. Why not just eliminate reps entirely for that zone?

Rather than Neg-Rep, in that zone, why not just debate your point without being an asshole about it?


Too difficult?

Steer clear.


Simple, really

Lotta people around here cannot debate anything without being an asshole. Either cuz they don't know how or don't want to, I can't tell which. I recommend avoidance.

 

[manifold]

Lotta people around here cannot debate anything without being an asshole.

And for some, even being an asshole doesn't help.

go figure

 

[hortysir]

That seems somewhat inequitable. Why not just eliminate reps entirely for that zone?

Rather than Neg-Rep, in that zone, why not just debate your point without being an asshole about it?


Too difficult?

Steer clear.


Simple, really

Lotta people around here cannot debate anything without being an asshole. Either cuz they don't know how or don't want to, I can't tell which. I recommend avoidance.

A thread in that Zone sorta sends the message that someone's sensibilities are too sensitive to engage in a raw debate.

And it makes you afraid to respond too harshly because you may prompt Mr/Mrs Sensitive to report you for disagreeing with them.

I come from a humor site that has a small debate section.
They focus on the humor and "getting along" with everyone, so their Debate section is a No Flame Zone.
So I'm used to it.
I see certain members hovering around that line, pushing buttons, trying to prompt a reaction that they can Report.

Chickenshit, if you ask me.

That's why I stay here more than there

 

[sealadaigh]

Not at all. I'll kick her ass when everybody's done licking it.

Right now what I see is her posing really poorly constructed bashes, telling anyone who presents a good argument against her that they're breaking the rules, and a bunch of like-minded morons telling her how wonderful it is to have some *real* debate.

yeah, that too...but i like the sig part about "When the Founding Fathers protected our right to free speech, I think that meant we were supposed to use it."

 

[Black_Label]

Not at all. I'll kick her ass when everybody's done licking it.

Right now what I see is her posing really poorly constructed bashes, telling anyone who presents a good argument against her that they're breaking the rules, and a bunch of like-minded morons telling her how wonderful it is to have some *real* debate.

You couldn't kick your own ass from your head being so far up it.

Otherwise it's the nothing but a bunch of right wing trolls bashing Obama v. boop forum

 

[Conservative]

Not at all. I'll kick her ass when everybody's done licking it.

Right now what I see is her posing really poorly constructed bashes, telling anyone who presents a good argument against her that they're breaking the rules, and a bunch of like-minded morons telling her how wonderful it is to have some *real* debate.

You couldn't kick your own ass from your head being so far up it.

Otherwise it's the nothing but a bunch of right wing trolls bashing Obama v. boop forum

(points at BL)

@ your complete lack of debate skills!

 

[freedombecki]

Is it true that neg reps are not allowed in the CDZ, but positive reps are?

That is true.

That seems somewhat inequitable. Why not just eliminate reps entirely for that zone?

Because nobody wants to get kicked out for giving someone a pos rep, that's why.

 

[Moonglow]

I just heard of it today. I have no idea where it's hidden.

The broom closet, now get cleaning this room you messed up.

 

[freedombecki]

Not at all. I'll kick her ass when everybody's done licking it.

Right now what I see is her posing really poorly constructed bashes, telling anyone who presents a good argument against her that they're breaking the rules, and a bunch of like-minded morons telling her how wonderful it is to have some *real* debate.

You couldn't kick your own ass from your head being so far up it.

Otherwise it's the nothing but a bunch of right wing trolls bashing Obama v. boop forum

I don't think you should project your Freudian Stage I fixation on kg. Ever look at your own avie and realize it says more about you than anybody else?