- Thread starter
- #41
I don't think many conservatives (Libertarian and otherwise) will be willing to consider FLUSHING hundreds of incumbents from DC in November 2012.Princess:why would you use the word "great"? where in any post i have ever made about the president have i used the word "great"? i don't believe you'll find a single post that uses that word.
but if you think i'd ever vote for someone who thinks planned parenthood should be defunded or more justices like clarence thomas put on the bench, well.. let's just say that i'd cut off my arm first.
and until there is serious election finance reform, you will never get the kind of representation you want. neither will i. .. and good luck getting campaign finance reform in a post-citizens united world.
and honestly, there isn't a single potential repub candidate i could stomach. i might have voted for mccain 2000... but mccain 2008 was too busy pandering to the radical right for me to take seriously.
If The Other Side of Paradise has established third party candidates appearing on its ballots, you aren't limited to Republican OR Democrat.
As individuals, a third party vote is usually meaningless; however, if millions of Democrats/Progressives cast third party votes in 2012 that FLUSH hundreds of Democrats from DC in a single news cycle, Hope and Change become Obama's (and the tea party's) worst nightmare.
thhird party? You mean like Libertarians who run on the republican ticket and are TP associated as well?
If the Democrats and Republicans have outlived their usefulness to this country, it will probably be elected Democrats who are FLUSHED first.