Can conservatives make money without the labor of liberals?

[Ernie S.]

Hmm I think not, since even the stock market depends on labor.

Can conservatives make money without the labor of liberals?
Sure we can. Conservatives have a much stronger work ethic.

 

[Ernie S.]

who will you get to do your sceince for you?

Someone who can spell, thanks.

 

[Truthmatters]

You would make any scientists who said global warming is effected by man leave the country.


that means you would ONLY have right wing people doing your science.

they would merely adjust sceince to fit the republican party ideas.


that means they would no longer be doing science

 

[Nosmo King]

Hmm I think not, since even the stock market depends on labor.

There are probably more conservative 'laborers' as 'liberal.'

Why must you liberals try to divide the entire nation as 'us versus them' at every hypothetical opportunity?

You should understand that this is an impossible way to approach government and that you are only going to create the next Weimar Republic in doing so.

That quote's a keeper! I just wonder how long, especially in an election year, it will take to backfire?

 

[The T]

Could you blow the marxist dog whistle any louder?

You actually think that labor is provided exclusively by LOLberals?



What happened today with the LOLberals? Was it the failed Romney attacks by Obama that is causing this mindless teeth gnashing?

The OP is dillusional. All there is to it. In his world ALL hard workers are LIBERAL/Statists. Rightwing scum as us were 'born into it'...

god forbid we work hard and conserve our money and use it more efficiently.

And that's just it, isn't it? The OP and his fellow travellers that infest these boards think Government can do better at defciding what to do with YOUR sweat equity and earned property better than YOU can.

By virtue of YOU being Conservative have no Earthly clue what to do with it.

The OP thinks Statists are better at labour than anyone else.

 

[Nosmo King]

Another question for you: would labor, lib or con, have a job at all if investors, lib or con, didn't put up money first?

short answer: NO

longer answer: NO, you fucking idiot.

No investor is going to put up a dime without strong consumer demand for the product. Keep screwing the Middle Class at the benefit of the wealthy and watch that golden goose of consumer spending die a slow death.

 

[salem.hills]

right wing laborer ^

 

[signelect]

I am not a liberal and am working my ass of because of the economy that Obama promised to fix. Now he just says that it would have been worse if he hadn't taken over. BS in my opinion. Work is a r letter word ending in K that liberals don't understand Nancy P was mentioned and she hasn't broken a sweat in years.

 

[Wiseacre]

Another question for you: would labor, lib or con, have a job at all if investors, lib or con, didn't put up money first?

short answer: NO

longer answer: NO, you fucking idiot.

No investor is going to put up a dime without strong consumer demand for the product. Keep screwing the Middle Class at the benefit of the wealthy and watch that golden goose of consumer spending die a slow death.

Obviously no investor will put up any money if the expected demand is insufficient, but that is beside the point.

"Keep screwing the middle class at the benefit of the wealthy", there we have it. 100%, absolute bullshit.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

you guys hate sceintists who dont back your preconcieved notions.


You wouldnt get very far with just con accepted sceince.

No one but you is talking about scientist you dim-witted no spelling idiot!!


Were you born stupid?

 

[Ernie S.]

Another question for you: would labor, lib or con, have a job at all if investors, lib or con, didn't put up money first?

short answer: NO

longer answer: NO, you fucking idiot.

No investor is going to put up a dime without strong consumer demand for the product. Keep screwing the Middle Class at the benefit of the wealthy and watch that golden goose of consumer spending die a slow death.

Keep screwing the job creators and consumer spending will disappear no matter what the demand is. People with no jobs do not spend

 

[SniperFire]

Another question for you: would labor, lib or con, have a job at all if investors, lib or con, didn't put up money first?

short answer: NO

longer answer: NO, you fucking idiot.[/quote]No investor is going to put up a dime without strong consumer demand for the product. Keep screwing the Middle Class at the benefit of the wealthy and watch that golden goose of consumer spending die a slow death.

Thanks for demonstrating you haven't the slightest clue what you are talking about.

 

[Nosmo King]

Another question for you: would labor, lib or con, have a job at all if investors, lib or con, didn't put up money first?

short answer: NO

longer answer: NO, you fucking idiot.

No investor is going to put up a dime without strong consumer demand for the product. Keep screwing the Middle Class at the benefit of the wealthy and watch that golden goose of consumer spending die a slow death.

Keep screwing the job creators and consumer spending will disappear no matter what the demand is. People with no jobs do not spend

It's not a chicken or the egg thing! Consumer spending DRIVES the economy. Coddling the rich and waiting for them to 'trickle down' their largess is not working now any better than it ever has. Economic growth is driven by demand. No investor, no matter what their tax rates, will spend money on something that will not sell. Why ain't it sellin'? Because the Middle Class wage earner has lost capital while the rich have raked it in!

Keep coddling the rich. They will do just fine. But if you want economic growth, realize this simple fact: IT HAPPENS FROM THE BOTTOM UP! Give the consumer the disposable income he enjoyed pre-Reagan/Bush tax cuts for the top wager earners and stand back! The economy will explode with opportunities.

 

[The T]

you guys hate sceintists who dont back your preconcieved notions.


You wouldnt get very far with just con accepted sceince.

No one but you is talking about scientist you dim-witted no spelling idiot!!


Were you born stupid?

Short Answer? YES.

 

[Nosmo King]

Another question for you: would labor, lib or con, have a job at all if investors, lib or con, didn't put up money first?

short answer: NO

longer answer: NO, you fucking idiot.

No investor is going to put up a dime without strong consumer demand for the product. Keep screwing the Middle Class at the benefit of the wealthy and watch that golden goose of consumer spending die a slow death.

Obviously no investor will put up any money if the expected demand is insufficient, but that is beside the point.

"Keep screwing the middle class at the benefit of the wealthy", there we have it. 100%, absolute bullshit.

Right. Because both wealthy and middle class wage earners have seen an identical up tick in their wages and benefits? No. Because once the wealthy get what they want, the rest will automatically trickle down to the middle class? No.


So.....where's the 100% bullshit? Or is that just the position Limbaugh told you was right?

 

[SniperFire]

No investor, no matter what their tax rates, will spend money on something that will not sell. .

Wrong, idiot.

Venture capital is often ventured on new unproven concepts.

 

[Nosmo King]

No investor, no matter what their tax rates, will spend money on something that will not sell. .

Wrong, idiot.

Venture capital is often ventured on new unproven concepts.

Then run right out and open a showroom selling racing yachts in Denver. No demand, no sales. Without a vibrant middle class, there is no demand. The economy slows.

And you throw around the epithet "idiot" as if you were experienced in being called one.

 

[The T]

No investor, no matter what their tax rates, will spend money on something that will not sell. .

Wrong, idiot.

Venture capital is often ventured on new unproven concepts.

People as Edison, and the inventors of the late 1800's/Early 1900's is a great example.

 

[Lakhota]

No investor, no matter what their tax rates, will spend money on something that will not sell. .

Wrong, idiot.

Venture capital is often ventured on new unproven concepts.

That's funny. Would a venture capitalist invest in a 500 pound mousetrap without prior comprehensive market analyses and research? I don't think so...

 

[The T]

No investor, no matter what their tax rates, will spend money on something that will not sell. .

Wrong, idiot.

Venture capital is often ventured on new unproven concepts.

Then run right out and open a showroom selling racing yachts in Denver. No demand, no sales. Without a vibrant middle class, there is no demand. The economy slows.

And you throw around the epithet "idiot" as if you were experienced in being called one.

That's because the term was apprpriate for you. Ever crack a history book in your life?