What is morally wrong is profiting financially from it.Can you imagine being confronted with the moral dilemma of this:
Plane crash survivor describes the moment he resorted to cannibalism
Morally it's wrong. But if it's life or death?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What is morally wrong is profiting financially from it.Can you imagine being confronted with the moral dilemma of this:
Plane crash survivor describes the moment he resorted to cannibalism
Morally it's wrong. But if it's life or death?
Can you imagine being confronted with the moral dilemma of this:
Plane crash survivor describes the moment he resorted to cannibalism
Morally it's wrong. But if it's life or death?
As a guy who won't eat food that touched the floor (even if for less than 3 seconds!) I can assure you that I would NOT EVER go cannibal.
What is morally wrong is profiting financially from it.Can you imagine being confronted with the moral dilemma of this:
Plane crash survivor describes the moment he resorted to cannibalism
Morally it's wrong. But if it's life or death?
Yes, writing a book about it.What is morally wrong is profiting financially from it.Can you imagine being confronted with the moral dilemma of this:
Plane crash survivor describes the moment he resorted to cannibalism
Morally it's wrong. But if it's life or death?
What? Writing a book about it? I suppose so.
But I'd interested in reading about that emotional dilemma. Eating your friend. Could haunt you for the rest of your life.
Given the fact that there is no ‘god’ as perceived by theists, ‘morality’ is a creation of man – just as flawed, inconsistent, and subjective as anything else man creates.Many theists believe it is clear-cut. Humans can only have opinions about morality, and no one’s opinion is any more valid than anyone else’s. This leads them to the conclusion that an objective source of morality must stand apart from, and above, humans. That source, they say, is God. Since atheists, reject God, atheists can have no basis for morality.
This is really two separate arguments: (1) that God is the source of objective morality and humans can learn morality from God and (2) that humans on their own have no way to know what is moral and what is not.
Can atheists be moral? - Atheist Alliance International
Given the fact that there is no ‘god’ as perceived by theists, ‘morality’ is a creation of man – just as flawed, inconsistent, and subjective as anything else man creates.
Consequently, theists have no ‘monopoly’ on morality – indeed, theists often fail to abide by the moral tenets their religious dogma dictates them to follow, and those free from religion are often as moral as theists, if not more so.
That’s total bullshit. But I understand why you believe this. If the universe were created through natural process and we are an accidental happenstance of matter and energy doing what matter and energy do, then there should be no expectation for absolute morals. Morals can be anything we want them to be. The problem is that nature does have a preference for an outcome. Societies and people which behave with virtue experience order and harmony. Societies and people which behave without virtue experience disorder and chaos. So we can see from the outcomes that not all behaviors have equal outcomes. That some behaviors have better outcomes and some behaviors have worse outcomes. This is the moral law at work. If the universe was created by spirit for the express purpose of creating beings that know and create we would expect that we would receive feedback on how we behave. The problem is that violating moral laws are not like violating physical laws. When we violate a physical law the consequences are immediate. If you try to defy gravity by jumping off a roof you will fall. Whereas the consequences for violating a moral law are more probabilistic in nature; many times we get away with it.Given the fact that there is no ‘god’ as perceived by theists, ‘morality’ is a creation of man – just as flawed, inconsistent, and subjective as anything else man creates.Many theists believe it is clear-cut. Humans can only have opinions about morality, and no one’s opinion is any more valid than anyone else’s. This leads them to the conclusion that an objective source of morality must stand apart from, and above, humans. That source, they say, is God. Since atheists, reject God, atheists can have no basis for morality.
This is really two separate arguments: (1) that God is the source of objective morality and humans can learn morality from God and (2) that humans on their own have no way to know what is moral and what is not.
Can atheists be moral? - Atheist Alliance International
Consequently, theists have no ‘monopoly’ on morality – indeed, theists often fail to abide by the moral tenets their religious dogma dictates them to follow, and those free from religion are often as moral as theists, if not more so.
Can you explain what you disagree with, GT?Its ok, dingerred. Nobody expects you to understand the difference between justification and assertion. Your brain always, literally ALWAYS points towards the most adolescent view of things. It's nobody's fault, I'm sure you get by.View attachment 238753Dingerred is triggered into his unsupported assertions. lol no wonder he's universally , left and right, treated like a dunce-cap wearing bartholomew
No need. You're a mother fuckin moron, and 99.9% of all folks reading have always agreed.Can you explain what you disagree with, GT?Its ok, dingerred. Nobody expects you to understand the difference between justification and assertion. Your brain always, literally ALWAYS points towards the most adolescent view of things. It's nobody's fault, I'm sure you get by.View attachment 238753Dingerred is triggered into his unsupported assertions. lol no wonder he's universally , left and right, treated like a dunce-cap wearing bartholomew
Dingerred is triggered into his unsupported assertions. lol no wonder he's universally , left and right, treated like a dunce-cap wearing bartholomew
Faith in certain institutions, if properly justified, is certainly beneficialDingerred is triggered into his unsupported assertions. lol no wonder he's universally , left and right, treated like a dunce-cap wearing bartholomew
He has faith. That will get you a long way on Earth and in Heaven.
No need. You're a mother fuckin moron, and 99.9% of all folks reading have always agreed.
You jump to conclusions as easily and as narrowly thought out as a 9yr old.
Random example....you stated the Universe shows preference for an outcome.
Ummmmm....
Preference implies agency.
The universe is an Agent?
You have no clue (its okay).
Preference is a very specific word.
Cause and effect working out a certain way does not* equate to evidence of a "wanted" way, or "preference." It simply points to the uniformity, or the nature of things. Not preference. Thats really basic.
Its as much evidence for preference as it is for happenstance, but you're too autistic brained to understand such things.
That was just the random, OBVIOUS example of what youve asked.
Its evidence (the Universe) for a lot of things. The proof comes when it's justified beyond a reasonable doubt as being....something.No need. You're a mother fuckin moron, and 99.9% of all folks reading have always agreed.
You jump to conclusions as easily and as narrowly thought out as a 9yr old.
Random example....you stated the Universe shows preference for an outcome.
Ummmmm....
Preference implies agency.
The universe is an Agent?
You have no clue (its okay).
Preference is a very specific word.
Cause and effect working out a certain way does not* equate to evidence of a "wanted" way, or "preference." It simply points to the uniformity, or the nature of things. Not preference. Thats really basic.
Its as much evidence for preference as it is for happenstance, but you're too autistic brained to understand such things.
That was just the random, OBVIOUS example of what youve asked.
It was actually backwards of reality. The Universe seeks entropy, therefore it must have a force that seeks order. That may well require a higher power.
I am glad you brought that up.No need. You're a mother fuckin moron, and 99.9% of all folks reading have always agreed.
You jump to conclusions as easily and as narrowly thought out as a 9yr old.
Random example....you stated the Universe shows preference for an outcome.
Ummmmm....
Preference implies agency.
The universe is an Agent?
You have no clue (its okay).
Preference is a very specific word.
Cause and effect working out a certain way does not* equate to evidence of a "wanted" way, or "preference." It simply points to the uniformity, or the nature of things. Not preference. Thats really basic.
Its as much evidence for preference as it is for happenstance, but you're too autistic brained to understand such things.
That was just the random, OBVIOUS example of what youve asked.
It was actually backwards of reality. The Universe seeks entropy, therefore it must have a force that seeks order. That may well require a higher power.
If we re-define what we mean by "God" to fit any idea we'd like, it becomes a meaningless concept. Sure, Tony the Tiger is God if we re-define God as the bringer of frosted flakes.What if God is all energy, matter, spirit and intelligence? That God was released in a Big Bang? That we are in His image because we are energy, matter, spirit and intelligence? That these things can neither be created nor destroyed, therefore eternal?
If we re-define what we mean by "God" to fit any idea we'd like, it becomes a meaningless concept. Sure, Tony the Tiger is God if we re-define God as the bringer of frosted flakes.What if God is all energy, matter, spirit and intelligence? That God was released in a Big Bang? That we are in His image because we are energy, matter, spirit and intelligence? That these things can neither be created nor destroyed, therefore eternal?
God cannot be matter and energy and exist outside of space and time. It isn't possible for matter and energy to exist outside of space and time.What if God is all energy, matter, spirit and intelligence? That God was released in a Big Bang? That we are in His image because we are energy, matter, spirit and intelligence? That these things can neither be created nor destroyed, therefore eternal?