Can Anyone Show Any Negatives Of A United States Of Africa?

[High_Gravity]

Its a good idea in theory but I just don't see it on the ground, waaayyy too much conflict on the continent right now.

 

[Asclepias]

A United Africa would make everyone else look like they were playing at civilization. Its the richest continent on the face of the earth in terms of pure resources both human and natural. Just look at all the genius that comes from Africa.

Just too much...

First one has to divide the continent between Arabic and Non Arabic. 2nd most of that "genius" petered out in the middle ages, when islam was a force of maintaining the past, instead of consisting of a large religious fundamentalist contingent.

3rd, most of Africa's Resources are hard to extract.

Finally, European colonization happened other places, like India, South America, China. Those places seem far more advanced than Africa, and they got their freedom around the same time.

Subsaharan Africa has never had a unified civilization, due to the roughness of the central terrain, and a lack of a far travelling sea-going culture.

Yes we are too much....for you and other silly whites to compete with. Thats why you stive to keep Africa down. Cant wreck the worlds finance with money backed by real resources.

No. One doesnt have to divide anything.. The genius in Africa has nothing to do with Arabs and still exists to this day. BTW did you know there are Black Arabs as well as the original Arabs being black?

Africas resources are not hard to extract. You must be high.

You have no clue about what you are saying. India is a country not a continent retard. Its still a hell hole over there. Same with parts of South America. China has never been colonized retard.

Who said super saharan Africa had a unified culture? Thats what we are talking about achieving. yes they had seagoing culture. Your lack of knowledge regarding that is your issue.

Western imperialism in Asia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

as for the rest of your post...

Imperialism is not colonization retard. Go get a dictionary. There was never a european power that controlled China. Thats why they were able to shake off the negative influences of Europe.

China's defeat at the hands of Japan was another trigger for future aggressive actions by Western powers. In 1897, Germanydemanded and was given a set of exclusive mining and railroad rights in Shandong province. Russia obtained access toDairen and Port Arthur and the right to build a railroad across Manchuria, thereby achieving complete domination over a large portion of northwestern China. The United Kingdom and France also received a number of concessions. At this time, much of China was divided up into "spheres of influence": Germany dominated Jiaozhou (Kiaochow) Bay, Shandong, and the Huang He (Hwang-Ho) valley; Russia dominated the Liaodong Peninsula and Manchuria; the United Kingdom dominated Weihaiweiand the Yangtze Valley; and France dominated the Guangzhou Bay and several other southern provinces.

No where in there do I see anything that says they were colonized. I do see spheres of influence and access but no control. If they had colonized China....China would not be running us around right now.

 

[Asclepias]

Its a good idea in theory but I just don't see it on the ground, waaayyy too much conflict on the continent right now.

A unifed Africa would put a stop to that. If they had their own money backed by their resources the countries that are in chaos wouldnt have to take loans from European powers vested in keeping them fighting each other.

 

[Taz]

Uniting 20 piles of shit into one big pile would only bring even more chaos. But not to worry, soon, China will own most of it.

 

[mudwhistle]

Peace,

I've heard talk about a United States of Africa...I agree that that would be nice, Africa as a united single power like the United States of America. Can anyone show any negatives of a United States of Africa?

Most of it is hot as Hell, they're cutting down all of the trees for firewood, people are hacking their neighbors to death with machetes, and the country is full of AIDs and Ebola.

Other than that it's a great place to live.

 

[Asclepias]

Uniting 20 piles of shit into one big pile would only bring even more chaos. But not to worry, soon, China will own most of it.

Is that what happened in your trailer park? You pieces of white shit arent the same as Africa. You have no value.

 

[Asclepias]

Peace,

I've heard talk about a United States of Africa...I agree that that would be nice, Africa as a united single power like the United States of America. Can anyone show any negatives of a United States of Africa?

Most of it is hot as Hell, they're cutting down all of the trees for firewood, people are hacking their neighbors to death with machetes, and the country is full of AIDs and Ebola.

Other than that it's a great place to live.

Hey stupid. Africa is not a country. Didnt they teach you anything before you dropped out of school in the 8th grade?

 

[martybegan]

Just too much...

First one has to divide the continent between Arabic and Non Arabic. 2nd most of that "genius" petered out in the middle ages, when islam was a force of maintaining the past, instead of consisting of a large religious fundamentalist contingent.

3rd, most of Africa's Resources are hard to extract.

Finally, European colonization happened other places, like India, South America, China. Those places seem far more advanced than Africa, and they got their freedom around the same time.

Subsaharan Africa has never had a unified civilization, due to the roughness of the central terrain, and a lack of a far travelling sea-going culture.

Yes we are too much....for you and other silly whites to compete with. Thats why you stive to keep Africa down. Cant wreck the worlds finance with money backed by real resources.

No. One doesnt have to divide anything.. The genius in Africa has nothing to do with Arabs and still exists to this day. BTW did you know there are Black Arabs as well as the original Arabs being black?

Africas resources are not hard to extract. You must be high.

You have no clue about what you are saying. India is a country not a continent retard. Its still a hell hole over there. Same with parts of South America. China has never been colonized retard.

Who said super saharan Africa had a unified culture? Thats what we are talking about achieving. yes they had seagoing culture. Your lack of knowledge regarding that is your issue.

Western imperialism in Asia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

as for the rest of your post...

Imperialism is not colonization retard. Go get a dictionary. There was never a european power that controlled China. Thats why they were able to shake off the negative influences of Europe.

China's defeat at the hands of Japan was another trigger for future aggressive actions by Western powers. In 1897, Germanydemanded and was given a set of exclusive mining and railroad rights in Shandong province. Russia obtained access toDairen and Port Arthur and the right to build a railroad across Manchuria, thereby achieving complete domination over a large portion of northwestern China. The United Kingdom and France also received a number of concessions. At this time, much of China was divided up into "spheres of influence": Germany dominated Jiaozhou (Kiaochow) Bay, Shandong, and the Huang He (Hwang-Ho) valley; Russia dominated the Liaodong Peninsula and Manchuria; the United Kingdom dominated Weihaiweiand the Yangtze Valley; and France dominated the Guangzhou Bay and several other southern provinces.

No where in there do I see anything that says they were colonized. I do see spheres of influence and access but no control. If they had colonized China....China would not be running us around right now.

They ruled in the areas they controlled, they just kept Chinese authorities in figurehead positions.

They controlled the productive areas, just like in Africa.

 

[GHook93]

Peace,

I've heard talk about a United States of Africa...I agree that that would be nice, Africa as a united single power like the United States of America. Can anyone show any negatives of a United States of Africa?

Just for the fact that they don't seem to be able to govern a small village in Africa, much less what will be the 1st or 2nd largest country in the world.

 

[GHook93]

That wont happen as long as Europeans have a stranglehold on the money game. You realize they were trying to create a Bank of Africa led by Qaddafi and they killed him. It would have sunk or present finance system because their money would have been based on tangible resources that Africa has an excess of.

Alot of African leaders didn't support bro. Gadhafi, did they? That is too bad if he was trying to form a United States of Africa. Divided, Africa is easy pickings for her enemies. A United States of Africa would have alot of power.

Nope it would have to happen behind the barrel of a gun.

 

[Asclepias]

Yes we are too much....for you and other silly whites to compete with. Thats why you stive to keep Africa down. Cant wreck the worlds finance with money backed by real resources.

No. One doesnt have to divide anything.. The genius in Africa has nothing to do with Arabs and still exists to this day. BTW did you know there are Black Arabs as well as the original Arabs being black?

Africas resources are not hard to extract. You must be high.

You have no clue about what you are saying. India is a country not a continent retard. Its still a hell hole over there. Same with parts of South America. China has never been colonized retard.

Who said super saharan Africa had a unified culture? Thats what we are talking about achieving. yes they had seagoing culture. Your lack of knowledge regarding that is your issue.

Western imperialism in Asia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

as for the rest of your post...

Imperialism is not colonization retard. Go get a dictionary. There was never a european power that controlled China. Thats why they were able to shake off the negative influences of Europe.

China's defeat at the hands of Japan was another trigger for future aggressive actions by Western powers. In 1897, Germanydemanded and was given a set of exclusive mining and railroad rights in Shandong province. Russia obtained access toDairen and Port Arthur and the right to build a railroad across Manchuria, thereby achieving complete domination over a large portion of northwestern China. The United Kingdom and France also received a number of concessions. At this time, much of China was divided up into "spheres of influence": Germany dominated Jiaozhou (Kiaochow) Bay, Shandong, and the Huang He (Hwang-Ho) valley; Russia dominated the Liaodong Peninsula and Manchuria; the United Kingdom dominated Weihaiweiand the Yangtze Valley; and France dominated the Guangzhou Bay and several other southern provinces.

No where in there do I see anything that says they were colonized. I do see spheres of influence and access but no control. If they had colonized China....China would not be running us around right now.

They ruled in the areas they controlled, they just kept Chinese authorities in figurehead positions.

They controlled the productive areas, just like in Africa.

So why cant you find me a link that says they were colonized? Did you think I would just take your word for it?

 

[Asclepias]

Peace,

I've heard talk about a United States of Africa...I agree that that would be nice, Africa as a united single power like the United States of America. Can anyone show any negatives of a United States of Africa?

Just for the fact that they don't seem to be able to govern a small village in Africa, much less what will be the 1st or 2nd largest country in the world.

You're like the 5th cave chimp I had to tell that Africa is not a country in the last 2 days.Cave chimps like you must not get out much if you think countries in Africa cannot manage themselves. No wonder you monkeys are kept locked up in trailer parks.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Peace,

I've heard talk about a United States of Africa...I agree that that would be nice, Africa as a united single power like the United States of America. Can anyone show any negatives of a United States of Africa?

Just for the fact that they don't seem to be able to govern a small village in Africa, much less what will be the 1st or 2nd largest country in the world.

You're like the 5th cave chimp I had to tell that Africa is not a country in the last 2 days.Cave chimps like you must not get out much if you think countries in Africa cannot manage themselves. No wonder you monkeys are kept locked up in trailer parks.

Damn you are one stupid fuck.

He was talking about if Africa did unite and become one nation that they wouldn't be able to govern.

 

[Asclepias]

Peace,

I've heard talk about a United States of Africa...I agree that that would be nice, Africa as a united single power like the United States of America. Can anyone show any negatives of a United States of Africa?

Just for the fact that they don't seem to be able to govern a small village in Africa, much less what will be the 1st or 2nd largest country in the world.

You're like the 5th cave chimp I had to tell that Africa is not a country in the last 2 days.Cave chimps like you must not get out much if you think countries in Africa cannot manage themselves. No wonder you monkeys are kept locked up in trailer parks.

Damn you are one stupid fuck.

He was talking about if Africa did unite and become one nation that they wouldn't be able to govern.

I know. Thats why I called him a monkey. You white cave chimps are pretty stupid. The ones like you that got put in prision are even dumber.

 

[martybegan]

Western imperialism in Asia - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

as for the rest of your post...

Imperialism is not colonization retard. Go get a dictionary. There was never a european power that controlled China. Thats why they were able to shake off the negative influences of Europe.

China's defeat at the hands of Japan was another trigger for future aggressive actions by Western powers. In 1897, Germanydemanded and was given a set of exclusive mining and railroad rights in Shandong province. Russia obtained access toDairen and Port Arthur and the right to build a railroad across Manchuria, thereby achieving complete domination over a large portion of northwestern China. The United Kingdom and France also received a number of concessions. At this time, much of China was divided up into "spheres of influence": Germany dominated Jiaozhou (Kiaochow) Bay, Shandong, and the Huang He (Hwang-Ho) valley; Russia dominated the Liaodong Peninsula and Manchuria; the United Kingdom dominated Weihaiweiand the Yangtze Valley; and France dominated the Guangzhou Bay and several other southern provinces.

No where in there do I see anything that says they were colonized. I do see spheres of influence and access but no control. If they had colonized China....China would not be running us around right now.

They ruled in the areas they controlled, they just kept Chinese authorities in figurehead positions.

They controlled the productive areas, just like in Africa.

So why cant you find me a link that says they were colonized? Did you think I would just take your word for it?

Spheres of influence = colonization. Just because they don't use the same word doesn't mean the same concept.

I posted the imperialism in the East wikipedia link, its up to you to understand it.

Its nice to know black supremacists are just as dumb as white ones. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

 

[Asclepias]

Imperialism is not colonization retard. Go get a dictionary. There was never a european power that controlled China. Thats why they were able to shake off the negative influences of Europe.

China's defeat at the hands of Japan was another trigger for future aggressive actions by Western powers. In 1897, Germanydemanded and was given a set of exclusive mining and railroad rights in Shandong province. Russia obtained access toDairen and Port Arthur and the right to build a railroad across Manchuria, thereby achieving complete domination over a large portion of northwestern China. The United Kingdom and France also received a number of concessions. At this time, much of China was divided up into "spheres of influence": Germany dominated Jiaozhou (Kiaochow) Bay, Shandong, and the Huang He (Hwang-Ho) valley; Russia dominated the Liaodong Peninsula and Manchuria; the United Kingdom dominated Weihaiweiand the Yangtze Valley; and France dominated the Guangzhou Bay and several other southern provinces.

No where in there do I see anything that says they were colonized. I do see spheres of influence and access but no control. If they had colonized China....China would not be running us around right now.

They ruled in the areas they controlled, they just kept Chinese authorities in figurehead positions.

They controlled the productive areas, just like in Africa.

So why cant you find me a link that says they were colonized? Did you think I would just take your word for it?

Spheres of influence = colonization. Just because they don't use the same word doesn't mean the same concept.

I posted the imperialism in the East wikipedia link, its up to you to understand it.

Its nice to know black supremacists are just as dumb as white ones. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

No it doesnt mean the same thing retard. Thats why you cant find a link like I can that says for example the country of Senegal was colonized by the French. Dont be upset you got caught in a lie. Nice to know white boys that think they know their own language cant figure out the difference between sphere of influence and colonization.

 

[martybegan]

No where in there do I see anything that says they were colonized. I do see spheres of influence and access but no control. If they had colonized China....China would not be running us around right now.

They ruled in the areas they controlled, they just kept Chinese authorities in figurehead positions.

They controlled the productive areas, just like in Africa.

So why cant you find me a link that says they were colonized? Did you think I would just take your word for it?

Spheres of influence = colonization. Just because they don't use the same word doesn't mean the same concept.

I posted the imperialism in the East wikipedia link, its up to you to understand it.

Its nice to know black supremacists are just as dumb as white ones. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

No it doesnt mean the same thing retard. Thats why you cant find a link like I can that says for example the country of Senegal was colonized by the French. Dont be upset you got caught in a lie. Nice to know white boys that think they know their own language cant figure out the difference between sphere of influence and colonization.

Its not a lie, its a fact. History, learn it.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Peace,

I've heard talk about a United States of Africa...I agree that that would be nice, Africa as a united single power like the United States of America. Can anyone show any negatives of a United States of Africa?

Just for the fact that they don't seem to be able to govern a small village in Africa, much less what will be the 1st or 2nd largest country in the world.

You're like the 5th cave chimp I had to tell that Africa is not a country in the last 2 days.Cave chimps like you must not get out much if you think countries in Africa cannot manage themselves. No wonder you monkeys are kept locked up in trailer parks.

Damn you are one stupid fuck.

He was talking about if Africa did unite and become one nation that they wouldn't be able to govern.

I know. Thats why I called him a monkey. You white cave chimps are pretty stupid. The ones like you that got put in prision are even dumber.

Smart enough to understand how to comprehend what was written. Unlike your dumb ass.

 

[Asclepias]

No where in there do I see anything that says they were colonized. I do see spheres of influence and access but no control. If they had colonized China....China would not be running us around right now.

They ruled in the areas they controlled, they just kept Chinese authorities in figurehead positions.

They controlled the productive areas, just like in Africa.

So why cant you find me a link that says they were colonized? Did you think I would just take your word for it?

Spheres of influence = colonization. Just because they don't use the same word doesn't mean the same concept.

I posted the imperialism in the East wikipedia link, its up to you to understand it.

Its nice to know black supremacists are just as dumb as white ones. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

No it doesnt mean the same thing retard. Thats why you cant find a link like I can that says for example the country of Senegal was colonized by the French. Dont be upset you got caught in a lie. Nice to know white boys that think they know their own language cant figure out the difference between sphere of influence and colonization.

Its not a lie, its a fact. History, learn it.

Yet you cant show me anywhere in documented history written by white people that China was colonized by any country in Europe. Why not?

 

[Asclepias]

Peace,

I've heard talk about a United States of Africa...I agree that that would be nice, Africa as a united single power like the United States of America. Can anyone show any negatives of a United States of Africa?

Just for the fact that they don't seem to be able to govern a small village in Africa, much less what will be the 1st or 2nd largest country in the world.

You're like the 5th cave chimp I had to tell that Africa is not a country in the last 2 days.Cave chimps like you must not get out much if you think countries in Africa cannot manage themselves. No wonder you monkeys are kept locked up in trailer parks.

Damn you are one stupid fuck.

He was talking about if Africa did unite and become one nation that they wouldn't be able to govern.

I know. Thats why I called him a monkey. You white cave chimps are pretty stupid. The ones like you that got put in prision are even dumber.

Smart enough to understand how to comprehend what was written. Unlike your dumb ass.

Go pick some lice off your head convict. You arent smart enough to understand anything but Miranda rights.