- Thread starter
- #201
I wonder if they are still reeling from the alarmists who turn their graphs upside down and change the axis names?
As someone who had high hopes for the BEST program, I must admit I have been disappointed with them. By their own admission one out of three temperature stations has a cooling trend yet by the time they are finished with their adjustments all stations have a positive trend. It has to do with station 'reliability' and multiple iterations of corrections. What they consider a good station can be weighted up to 26 times higher than a 'poor' station. And there are typically 10-60 iterations done until the station converges on the trend that they consider correct.
Likewise it is somewhat incomprehensible that BEST finds the UHI effect to have an overall cooling bias.
Do you actually believe all the evidence the world's climate scientists have found and that the IPCC has assembled is false?