Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Look, I come from a long line of lunch bag toters, and cereal eaters. Parents need to get off their asses and start being a parent. Feeding your kid is a part of that, it's why you get the food stamps in the first place. Quit worrying so much about the kids, thats their parents job.
Look, I come from a long line of lunch bag toters, and cereal eaters. Parents need to get off their asses and start being a parent. Feeding your kid is a part of that, it's why you get the food stamps in the first place. Quit worrying so much about the kids, thats their parents job.
Not if the parents cannot afford to feed their children well. We require that children attend school every day and learn. Well, they can't learn if they can't concentrate because they are HUNGRY.
A country that can afford to drop bombs costing $500,000 each can afford to feed poor children a decent meal in schools.
They got food stamps that already put food on the table for that meal, then we pay for the school to feed them again, the same meal.
Obviously SNAP doesn't "work" as outlined in the table.
Why not just fix one program instead of creating a new bunch of bureaucrats to pay?
?Because there aren't enough votes in Congress to address the issue of low wages not keeping up with housing bubbles or rising costs
That's what SNAP is forLook, I come from a long line of lunch bag toters, and cereal eaters. Parents need to get off their asses and start being a parent. Feeding your kid is a part of that, it's why you get the food stamps in the first place. Quit worrying so much about the kids, thats their parents job.
Not if the parents cannot afford to feed their children well. We require that children attend school every day and learn. Well, they can't learn if they can't concentrate because they are HUNGRY.
And double again, how exactly do you feed a family of four on 368 a month?
The important thing to look at here isn't weather they should have a school lunch program (which they shouldn't), or not. It is weather people are consistant with their morality.
You can't be against abortion, and then against the school lunch program that makes no sense. What? you want the child born so he/she can starve.
It's like all the other people saying, "we need are schools to perform better but we're cutting the education budget." How does that thinking jive?
Look, I come from a long line of lunch bag toters, and cereal eaters. Parents need to get off their asses and start being a parent. Feeding your kid is a part of that, it's why you get the food stamps in the first place. Quit worrying so much about the kids, thats their parents job.
Again, not everyone that qualifies for free or reduced school lunches get food stamps. And double again, how exactly do you feed a family of four on 368 a month? I'm an extremely frugal shopper in the midwest close to producing farms and I can't feed three people on less than 400 a month.They got food stamps that already put food on the table for that meal, then we pay for the school to feed them again, the same meal.
What does the constitution say about the states petitioning the federal government for help? Does the constitution say the feds must refuse to help the states?
You can't be against abortion, and then against the school lunch program that makes no sense
The need for a free and reduced lunch program has been well established by both studies and classroom experience. Hungry kids do not do well in school and create classroom disruptions. Most kids from low income homes do not get a satisfactory lunches unless the school provides it. For many of these kids, the only good meal they get is at school. Low income parents often send the kids to school with nothing more than a couple of donuts or a ketchup sandwich which is just about worthless. The total cost of the school lunch program for the country is only 9.8 billion dollars a year which is a bargain when you consider we have already spent a billion dollars in the first days of maintaining the Libyan no fly zone.Why the National School Lunch Program exists?
Shouldn't poor families already be receiving aid through SNAP?
If SNAP works, why do we need the NSLP?
Why does the Fed need to be involved? Why can't the State collect the taxes and fund the programs in their own districts?
Why do we need to Fed involved in this?
Why the National School Lunch Program exists?
Shouldn't poor families already be receiving aid through SNAP?
If SNAP works, why do we need the NSLP?
Why does the Fed need to be involved? Why can't the State collect the taxes and fund the programs in their own districts?
Why do we need to Fed involved in this?
What the fuck does FedEx have to do with anything?
So then we can agree to not count children attending school when determining SNAP benefits, since the poor are all shitty parents and never use those benefits to feed the children anyway?
Are you spending the tax-dollars twice when you feed the child once? Is that the problem? I think you worry about the little things in life. Does it keep you awake at night?
No program is made unless it is needed.
Guess that just answered my question. You're incredibly stupid, but most of us already knew that anyway.I don't need to show you anything, and its the general welfare clause.
