California's Split Personality: Should it split into 6 new states?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Destroyer2, Jan 25, 2014.

?

Should California split into 6 states?

  1. Yes, this will increase state government efficiency

    10.5%
  2. Yes, this will allow California's diversity to be better represented

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Yes, but it should only be split into 3 states

    15.8%
  4. Yes, but it should only be split into 2 states

    10.5%
  5. Yes, other reason not listed here (explain)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. No, splitting California into 6 states has no benefits

    21.1%
  7. No, this is just a Silicon Valley effort to create their own state

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. No, other reason not listed here (explain)

    15.8%
  9. Other (explain)

    26.3%
  1. Destroyer2
    Offline

    Destroyer2 Worst. Title. Ever.

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Messages:
    421
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +66
    SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

    Tim Draper (a Silicon Valley-based investor) wants to add a proposition to the 2014 California ballot to split California into 6 new states, which would each have their own state governments and their own 2 Senators.

    Should it be done?

    (Personal opinion: No, cause it's silly and there's no reason to :tongue:)
     
  2. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Offline

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,483
    Thanks Received:
    3,132
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +3,661
    Six states seems unnecessary, but I think folks in the Inland Empire and the inland rural areas in the central and northern parts of the state have a good case to be made for wanting to split off from the coast. Right now the state is being run according to interest of the coastal folks and their priorities are not the same as the inland folks and in many cases the laws and regulations they have passed have hurt the livelihood of the rural parts of the state. I think splitting the state in two is justified if that's what people want, although it is very unlikely to happen any time in the near future.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. HenryBHough
    Offline

    HenryBHough Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,159
    Thanks Received:
    1,916
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Oak Grove, Massachusetts
    Ratings:
    +2,374
    It won't happen.

    Approval would require congressional approval. The addition of ten new senators (yes, six "new" states" but elimination of the "old" one, hence a total of 12 of which 10 would be additional) would dilute the Senate and diminish the power of other pre-existintg states.

    Depending on the size of each of the six "new" states there might also be some dilution in The House though probably not.

    So The House might buy it but it would never survive The Senate no matter which party were in majority at the time.
     
  4. dcraelin
    Offline

    dcraelin Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2013
    Messages:
    964
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Ratings:
    +68
  5. KNB
    Offline

    KNB Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2013
    Messages:
    4,327
    Thanks Received:
    380
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +382
    California should legalize marijuana.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. OriginalShroom
    Offline

    OriginalShroom Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2013
    Messages:
    4,818
    Thanks Received:
    977
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,173
    Politically, it would be pick up in the House and Senate for the Republicans.
     
  7. Two Thumbs
    Offline

    Two Thumbs Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    24,271
    Thanks Received:
    4,118
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Where ever I go, there I am.
    Ratings:
    +4,304
    crazy times we live in

    multiple states want to break apart and some want to leave.

    I think HI is voting on leaving the union. considering the shitty economy they have, they'd be fucked
     
  8. Nyvin
    Offline

    Nyvin Silver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2013
    Messages:
    1,916
    Thanks Received:
    305
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +347
    Six states is crazy, and going way too far.

    Two states is reasonable though. Northern CA and Southern CA are extremely different, way more different then North and South Dakota are.
     
  9. HenryBHough
    Offline

    HenryBHough Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,159
    Thanks Received:
    1,916
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Oak Grove, Massachusetts
    Ratings:
    +2,374
    That might be workable but only if it were possible to allow those two states just ONE senator each and keep the total number of representatives the same as it is now. Especially if it's an odd number (California IS sorta odd) and one had to be split down the middle. Physically.
     
  10. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    56,424
    Thanks Received:
    8,961
    Trophy Points:
    300
    Ratings:
    +9,970
    That would bring us up to 63 states
     
  11. Lumpy 1
    Offline

    Lumpy 1 Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Messages:
    25,000
    Thanks Received:
    6,542
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Ratings:
    +6,570
    California is a beautiful state, it has it all but this liberal infestation and union govern-mental power has brought it bent over and on it's knees you might say..
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2014
  12. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Offline

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,483
    Thanks Received:
    3,132
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +3,661
    Well, it's not possible and frankly that's a stupid idea anyway. Why should the two hypothetical states of North and South California only have one U. S. Senator when their populations would still be higher than most of the other 49?
     
  13. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 USMB Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    61,783
    Thanks Received:
    6,723
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +6,961
    I have no problem if they want to reorganize themselves into six states. Let them govern themselves as they choose.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  14. HenryBHough
    Offline

    HenryBHough Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,159
    Thanks Received:
    1,916
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Oak Grove, Massachusetts
    Ratings:
    +2,374
    Oh, I agree, that won't happen. But the creation of even TWO new Senate seats would queer the deal for the rest of The Senate who would see their power diluted. If the total number of senators remained constant (as would the number of representatives, that being population based) then enough present senators might be convinced to let it happen.

    I could see The Senate agreeing to let two states consolidate and therefore a reduction of two senate seats since that would increase the power of those remaining.

    But it's not about power - it's about service.

    I mean, isn't it?????
     
  15. Politico
    Offline

    Politico Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    11,200
    Thanks Received:
    706
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +835
    No. The whole state should be walled around and forgotten.
     
  16. deltex1
    Online

    deltex1 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,851
    Thanks Received:
    1,093
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Near the Alamo
    Ratings:
    +1,855
    California should be emptied of residents and re designated as a national park.
     
  17. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,207
    Thanks Received:
    2,218
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,219
    such love of your fellow Americans.

    you people are traitors and want to see this country shredded into fighting factions simply because you cant win elections legally
     
  18. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,207
    Thanks Received:
    2,218
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,219
    This country will win and you people will LOSE.

    The distruction you seek will never come,

    This country will come together again.


    You will never win
     
  19. deltex1
    Online

    deltex1 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,851
    Thanks Received:
    1,093
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Near the Alamo
    Ratings:
    +1,855
    God created California. He did not intend it to be an outhouse where libtard ideas are created and shipped to soil other parts of the nation.
     
  20. Seawytch
    Offline

    Seawytch Information isnt Advocacy

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    19,274
    Thanks Received:
    2,622
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Deep in liberal California
    Ratings:
    +2,942
    Now that's the best and only workable idea I've seen yet. It helps the whole state equally. The farmers have something to farm that doesn't need as much water as other crops, doesn't deplete the soil and can be made into food, fuel, fiber and just good old smoke!

    I'm a 5th Generation Californian and I support this idea...legalize ALL forms of the hemp plant!

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page