California's Budget Experiment

Seawytch

Information isnt Advocacy
Aug 5, 2010
42,407
7,739
1,860
Peaking out from the redwoods
California's Ballot Experiment

In a few weeks, California will hold its primary election. Not much news will be made, since the two major parties' presidential candidates are already known. But this election will be different for Californians in a major way. Because when the general election rolls around in November, there will likely be no third parties on the ballot for voters to choose from. Furthermore, in some races, there may be only one party represented on the general election ballot. [...]

The voters passed Proposition 14, which mandated a scheme known as "Top 2" voting. Explaining it is pretty simple, but what it could mean is a lot more complicated. In the primary election, all parties are free to put up as many candidates as they like for any particular office, as usual. But only the top two vote-getters -- from all parties combined -- will advance to the general election. In essence, the primary becomes the general election, and the general election becomes a runoff vote between the top two candidates.
While the presidential race is exempt from this scheme (presidential candidates from all parties will be on the general election ballot, as usual), most other offices will use "Top 2" voting: U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, and all state races (legislative and executive). What this means, for example, is that Dianne Feinstein may be facing a fellow Democrat on the ballot this November, with no Republican (or Green, or Libertarian) on the ballot at all.​

I foresee some extreme "buyers remorse"...
 
California's Ballot Experiment

In a few weeks, California will hold its primary election. Not much news will be made, since the two major parties' presidential candidates are already known. But this election will be different for Californians in a major way. Because when the general election rolls around in November, there will likely be no third parties on the ballot for voters to choose from. Furthermore, in some races, there may be only one party represented on the general election ballot. [...]

The voters passed Proposition 14, which mandated a scheme known as "Top 2" voting. Explaining it is pretty simple, but what it could mean is a lot more complicated. In the primary election, all parties are free to put up as many candidates as they like for any particular office, as usual. But only the top two vote-getters -- from all parties combined -- will advance to the general election. In essence, the primary becomes the general election, and the general election becomes a runoff vote between the top two candidates.
While the presidential race is exempt from this scheme (presidential candidates from all parties will be on the general election ballot, as usual), most other offices will use "Top 2" voting: U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, and all state races (legislative and executive). What this means, for example, is that Dianne Feinstein may be facing a fellow Democrat on the ballot this November, with no Republican (or Green, or Libertarian) on the ballot at all.​

I foresee some extreme "buyers remorse"...

Too much Sun or Too much Pot out there? :lol:

.
 
It is how they plan to keep Republicans from winning with a plurality when the Leftist vote gets split between the Socialist candidate, the Communist candidate, the Democrat, etc.
 
It is how they plan to keep Republicans from winning with a plurality when the Leftist vote gets split between the Socialist candidate, the Communist candidate, the Democrat, etc.

Bingo!

And they only have a $16B deficit too!
 
It is how they plan to keep Republicans from winning with a plurality when the Leftist vote gets split between the Socialist candidate, the Communist candidate, the Democrat, etc.

Bingo!

And they only have a $16B deficit too!

I say we build a fence around California and keep them all there. They could easily be a third world country in no time. :eusa_drool:
 
It is how they plan to keep Republicans from winning with a plurality when the Leftist vote gets split between the Socialist candidate, the Communist candidate, the Democrat, etc.

Who are "they"? This was a voter passed initiative, 53% to 46%.

The gubmint dependent voters who now dominate the electorate, of course.

You obviously don't know much about California (which fluctuates between the 4th to 8th largest economy in the world). Did you know that we Californians give more to the Federal Government than we get back?

I think that this will be a failed experiment and that people are going to be outraged the first time the "top two" are of the same party. Time will tell.

Care to discuss the topic or are you just on a "bash CA" binge? It would be great to know in advance so I can just ignore you if that is the case.
 

Forum List

Back
Top