California university's website says its ok for children to engage in sexual plays watch po*n

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,743
2,040
A public university in California features a controversial website that encourages parents to react “positively” when 4-year-olds touch each other’s private parts and says young children should be allowed to watch porn. The University of California, Santa Barbara hosts an online platform, within the sociology department, called “SexInfo Online,” which is maintained by students “who have studied advanced topics in human sexuality” that seek to answer a myriad of questions on sexuality, The College Fix reported.

“The majority of sexual play between children takes place between the ages of 4 and 7,” the website states in a section titled “Childhood Sexuality,” accompanied by a photo of two little girls that appear to be kissing on a beach. “Children might display affection to their friends by hugging and kissing, or even more which we won’t go into detail here, which is perfectly normal. Parents should not react in a negative way because children are just exploring.” CONTINUE


California university’s website says its OK for children to engage in ‘sexual play,’ and watch porn
------------------------------------

Ok so this is another one of those times where MINDWARS is left speechless because this is just getting way out of hands, it makes normal people want to throw up at the thought of this.
 
What the fuck is "po*n"?


Its what the OP and the link are lying about.

Damn christians will lie about anything.

Note to OP - post reliable links. Readers shouldn't have to go searching for the truth behind your lies.
 
What the fuck is "po*n"?


Its what the OP and the link are lying about.

Damn christians will lie about anything.

Note to OP - post reliable links. Readers shouldn't have to go searching for the truth behind your lies.

well Luddite------there are people who DO TOUT the idea that kid sex is a good idea-------all sorts of forms. There is a startling amount of "SEX"
stimulation going on. There are some REALLY explicit CARTOONS
on the boob-tube. ------some daytime TV is working on their little hormones
 
What the fuck is "po*n"?


Its what the OP and the link are lying about.

Damn christians will lie about anything.

Note to OP - post reliable links. Readers shouldn't have to go searching for the truth behind your lies.

well Luddite------there are people who DO TOUT the idea that kid sex is a good idea-------all sorts of forms. There is a startling amount of "SEX"
stimulation going on. There are some REALLY explicit CARTOONS
on the boob-tube. ------some daytime TV is working on their little hormones

Says right in the links it's ok for children to watch porn.

Leftists are filth
 
UoC Santa Barbaras new mascot :
Pedo Bear!
pedo-bear-strikes-again_c_629272.jpg
 
What the fuck is "po*n"?


Its what the OP and the link are lying about.

Damn christians will lie about anything.

Note to OP - post reliable links. Readers shouldn't have to go searching for the truth behind your lies.

well Luddite------there are people who DO TOUT the idea that kid sex is a good idea-------all sorts of forms. There is a startling amount of "SEX"
stimulation going on. There are some REALLY explicit CARTOONS
on the boob-tube. ------some daytime TV is working on their little hormones

Says right in the links it's ok for children to watch porn.

Leftists are filth

long ago-----when my kid was a baby------like three-----he learned easily how to get the TV on. I was horrified to see him FASCINATED by some cartoons called "ANIME" He does not suffer from photosensitive
epilepsy-----BUT that crap was loaded with perverse (IMO) sexual imagery.
MY LITTLE DELICATE BABY-----------------------so I distracted him---etc etc
etc etc--------I remain horrified
 
What the fuck is "po*n"?


Its what the OP and the link are lying about.

Damn christians will lie about anything.

Note to OP - post reliable links. Readers shouldn't have to go searching for the truth behind your lies.

well Luddite------there are people who DO TOUT the idea that kid sex is a good idea-------all sorts of forms. There is a startling amount of "SEX"
stimulation going on. There are some REALLY explicit CARTOONS
on the boob-tube. ------some daytime TV is working on their little hormones

Says right in the links it's ok for children to watch porn.

Leftists are filth

long ago-----when my kid was a baby------like three-----he learned easily how to get the TV on. I was horrified to see him FASCINATED by some cartoons called "ANIME" He does not suffer from photosensitive
epilepsy-----BUT that crap was loaded with perverse (IMO) sexual imagery.
MY LITTLE DELICATE BABY-----------------------so I distracted him---etc etc
etc etc--------I remain horrified

Yeah and many adults are into Anime.
 
A public university in California features a controversial website that encourages parents to react “positively” when 4-year-olds touch each other’s private parts and says young children should be allowed to watch porn. The University of California, Santa Barbara hosts an online platform, within the sociology department, called “SexInfo Online,” which is maintained by students “who have studied advanced topics in human sexuality” that seek to answer a myriad of questions on sexuality, The College Fix reported.

“The majority of sexual play between children takes place between the ages of 4 and 7,” the website states in a section titled “Childhood Sexuality,” accompanied by a photo of two little girls that appear to be kissing on a beach. “Children might display affection to their friends by hugging and kissing, or even more which we won’t go into detail here, which is perfectly normal. Parents should not react in a negative way because children are just exploring.”
.

WHAT-THE-FUCK???!!!

Well at least California is "out there" with it finally. It's about softening children for pedophilia.....just like we all knew it would lead to. This whole LGBT cult thing has always been about getting at the kiddies. That's the reason they wanted marriage because the only thing not automatically granted to them with civil unions was the right to adopt children "as marrieds".

Hey judge in Dumont v Lyons....you listening up here? BTW, what about the (deviant sexuality as tied to accomplishments) "important gays in history" mandated to be taught to little kids in public schools starting this Fall in CA? Will there be an "important Christians in History" class mandated as well that ties Christianity to a person's accomplishments? No? What was all that neutrality stuff with the recent USSC Decision?....
 
Anyone who cheer leads this kind of filth should not only be arrested for it, but they should be thrown in jail where the lifers are. They would be lucky if they lasted one full day.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
 

Forum List

Back
Top