Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nothing but right wing Hoaxery, how droll.The nutbaggery on display is fucking hilarious.
Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
Come get us shit stain.Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
Soon enough booger boy.Come get us shit stain.Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
Good, We got plenty of ammo for you scum.Soon enough booger boy.Come get us shit stain.Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
That's not what I asked. You continue doggedly to insist that term means something the people who wrote it didn't intend. Quote something from the people who wrote it that shows they wanted the federal government to have unlimited power to do what it wanted under the guise of "general welfare".I am getting it from our Constitution, expressly.Post some writings of the people who wrote the clause and voted on it that support your assertion, don't just keep insisting you're right.Both promote and provide are used in regard to the general welfare not the common defense. To the extent we don't enjoy perfect knowledge anything that promotes the general welfare will do; optimization should happen on a routine basis.No, we do not. The clause CLEARLY was not intended to grant the federal government power to do whatever was trendy at the time in the name of the general welfare. THAT'S what you have to prove, and you have to go far beyond just insisting over and over again that it was. Post some writings of the people who wrote the clause and voted on it that support your assertion.We have to quibble that the general welfare cannot be the general badfare.Yet you insist that it implies the government can do whatever it wants to in the name of "general welfare". That's not how it works, because you change the meaning of "general welfare" to fit whatever it is that you want at the time. Try this one on for size. The 2nd Amendment prevents the government from infringing on the right to own weapons. The "general welfare" clause is now interpreted to mean that it is in the best interests of the citizenry that citizens be allowed to defend themselves with firearms, because I say so. Thus, gun ownership is doubly protected.Providing for the general welfare is expressed not implied in any way.The 10th Amendment is clear. And yet, somehow, you managed to fuck it up. So here it is again, as not a single word of what you just stated, resides in it:Our Tenth Amendment is clear. The general power to provide for the general welfare cannot sacrifice the end to the means; we have no general badfare or general warfare clause.
Plain as day. Anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers in the US Constitution is illegal for the federal government to engage in.The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
You confuse everything that may be done for general welfare with anything that could be done for the general badfare or the general warfare.
Yes, WE should but the federal government is restricted to specifically enumerated powers, or did you forget that?Equal protection of the laws is in our Constitution. We should be promoting the general welfare at every opportunity.
Well all you need to do is learn how to load your weapon and then to hit something with the projectile instead of the butt! As for scum they are mostly in Tezas.Good, We got plenty of ammo for you scum.Soon enough booger boy.Come get us shit stain.Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
Troll is too dumb for rational thought.That's not what I asked. You continue doggedly to insist that term means something the people who wrote it didn't intend. Quote something from the people who wrote it that shows they wanted the federal government to have unlimited power to do what it wanted under the guise of "general welfare".I am getting it from our Constitution, expressly.Post some writings of the people who wrote the clause and voted on it that support your assertion, don't just keep insisting you're right.Both promote and provide are used in regard to the general welfare not the common defense. To the extent we don't enjoy perfect knowledge anything that promotes the general welfare will do; optimization should happen on a routine basis.No, we do not. The clause CLEARLY was not intended to grant the federal government power to do whatever was trendy at the time in the name of the general welfare. THAT'S what you have to prove, and you have to go far beyond just insisting over and over again that it was. Post some writings of the people who wrote the clause and voted on it that support your assertion.We have to quibble that the general welfare cannot be the general badfare.Yet you insist that it implies the government can do whatever it wants to in the name of "general welfare". That's not how it works, because you change the meaning of "general welfare" to fit whatever it is that you want at the time. Try this one on for size. The 2nd Amendment prevents the government from infringing on the right to own weapons. The "general welfare" clause is now interpreted to mean that it is in the best interests of the citizenry that citizens be allowed to defend themselves with firearms, because I say so. Thus, gun ownership is doubly protected.Providing for the general welfare is expressed not implied in any way.The 10th Amendment is clear. And yet, somehow, you managed to fuck it up. So here it is again, as not a single word of what you just stated, resides in it:Our Tenth Amendment is clear. The general power to provide for the general welfare cannot sacrifice the end to the means; we have no general badfare or general warfare clause.
Plain as day. Anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers in the US Constitution is illegal for the federal government to engage in.The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
You confuse everything that may be done for general welfare with anything that could be done for the general badfare or the general warfare.
We all know how to shoot, shit weasel.Well all you need to do is learn how to load your weapon and then to hit something with the projectile instead of the butt! As for scum they are mostly in Tezas.Good, We got plenty of ammo for you scum.Soon enough booger boy.Come get us shit stain.Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
Why bother, the mortar team needs practice anyway.Come get us shit stain.Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
It is not unlimited but that our tax monies are only to be used for the general welfare and common defense, along with paying the debt.That's not what I asked. You continue doggedly to insist that term means something the people who wrote it didn't intend. Quote something from the people who wrote it that shows they wanted the federal government to have unlimited power to do what it wanted under the guise of "general welfare".I am getting it from our Constitution, expressly.Post some writings of the people who wrote the clause and voted on it that support your assertion, don't just keep insisting you're right.Both promote and provide are used in regard to the general welfare not the common defense. To the extent we don't enjoy perfect knowledge anything that promotes the general welfare will do; optimization should happen on a routine basis.No, we do not. The clause CLEARLY was not intended to grant the federal government power to do whatever was trendy at the time in the name of the general welfare. THAT'S what you have to prove, and you have to go far beyond just insisting over and over again that it was. Post some writings of the people who wrote the clause and voted on it that support your assertion.We have to quibble that the general welfare cannot be the general badfare.Yet you insist that it implies the government can do whatever it wants to in the name of "general welfare". That's not how it works, because you change the meaning of "general welfare" to fit whatever it is that you want at the time. Try this one on for size. The 2nd Amendment prevents the government from infringing on the right to own weapons. The "general welfare" clause is now interpreted to mean that it is in the best interests of the citizenry that citizens be allowed to defend themselves with firearms, because I say so. Thus, gun ownership is doubly protected.Providing for the general welfare is expressed not implied in any way.The 10th Amendment is clear. And yet, somehow, you managed to fuck it up. So here it is again, as not a single word of what you just stated, resides in it:Our Tenth Amendment is clear. The general power to provide for the general welfare cannot sacrifice the end to the means; we have no general badfare or general warfare clause.
Plain as day. Anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers in the US Constitution is illegal for the federal government to engage in.The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
You confuse everything that may be done for general welfare with anything that could be done for the general badfare or the general warfare.
Fake.Why bother, the mortar team needs practice anyway.Come get us shit stain.Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
Fixing Standards for the Union covers it for the general welfare.Yes, WE should but the federal government is restricted to specifically enumerated powers, or did you forget that?Equal protection of the laws is in our Constitution. We should be promoting the general welfare at every opportunity.
Only well regulated militia of the United States may not be infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.Fake.Why bother, the mortar team needs practice anyway.Come get us shit stain.Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
So the federal government isn't empowered to use taxes for the Patent Office? Or Postal roads? Or paying salaries of federal employees? First you claim the federal government has unlimited powers, now you claim they have three.It is not unlimited but that our tax monies are only to be used for the general welfare and common defense, along with paying the debt.
I always get a kick out of moron Dimwingers who think they can ignore the Constitution when it addresses individual rights.Only well regulated militia of the United States may not be infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.Fake.Why bother, the mortar team needs practice anyway.Come get us shit stain.Getting rid of low life tezans and pukes would make America great again. As for California i love it here and find it to be the best place to live in the USA.Getting rid of democrats would work.We need national policy to help recover the economy.
And what did they mean by the term "general welfare". They wrote about it, they explained what they meant, so you tell us what THEY meant, NOT what you wish they meant.It is not unlimited but that our tax monies are only to be used for the general welfare and common defense, along with paying the debt.That's not what I asked. You continue doggedly to insist that term means something the people who wrote it didn't intend. Quote something from the people who wrote it that shows they wanted the federal government to have unlimited power to do what it wanted under the guise of "general welfare".I am getting it from our Constitution, expressly.Post some writings of the people who wrote the clause and voted on it that support your assertion, don't just keep insisting you're right.Both promote and provide are used in regard to the general welfare not the common defense. To the extent we don't enjoy perfect knowledge anything that promotes the general welfare will do; optimization should happen on a routine basis.No, we do not. The clause CLEARLY was not intended to grant the federal government power to do whatever was trendy at the time in the name of the general welfare. THAT'S what you have to prove, and you have to go far beyond just insisting over and over again that it was. Post some writings of the people who wrote the clause and voted on it that support your assertion.We have to quibble that the general welfare cannot be the general badfare.Yet you insist that it implies the government can do whatever it wants to in the name of "general welfare". That's not how it works, because you change the meaning of "general welfare" to fit whatever it is that you want at the time. Try this one on for size. The 2nd Amendment prevents the government from infringing on the right to own weapons. The "general welfare" clause is now interpreted to mean that it is in the best interests of the citizenry that citizens be allowed to defend themselves with firearms, because I say so. Thus, gun ownership is doubly protected.Providing for the general welfare is expressed not implied in any way.The 10th Amendment is clear. And yet, somehow, you managed to fuck it up. So here it is again, as not a single word of what you just stated, resides in it:Our Tenth Amendment is clear. The general power to provide for the general welfare cannot sacrifice the end to the means; we have no general badfare or general warfare clause.
Plain as day. Anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers in the US Constitution is illegal for the federal government to engage in.The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
You confuse everything that may be done for general welfare with anything that could be done for the general badfare or the general warfare.