California Crime Wave

American_Jihad

Flaming Libs/Koranimals
May 1, 2012
11,534
3,715
350
Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
You couldn't pay me enough to live in that f/u state...
The New California Crime Wave
A criminal-justice “reform” measure unleashes thousands of predators.
February 29, 2016
John Perazzo
police_line_crime_scene_2498847226.jpg


Something amazing has happened in California. First, a brief background: Crime rates across the state, after a long period of steady decline, had reached fifty-year lows in 2014. Then, that November, a 60 percent majority of California voters—presumably incapable of accepting such good news without a measure of collective guilt—decided that it would be a really enlightened idea to pass Proposition 47, a ballot initiative bearing the cheery name “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act.” The purpose of this measure was to downgrade many types of drug possession and property crimes from felonies (punishable by more than a year in prison) to misdemeanors (which often entail no prison time at all). For the benefit of squeamish skeptics, the self-assured proponents of Prop 47 condescended to explain that these reduced penalties would not only alleviate prison overcrowding, but would also make California's streets safer by placing drug offenders into warm-and-fuzzy treatment and counseling programs, rather than into disagreeable prison cells. If you think this sounds like a familiar old tune, you're quite correct. It was #1 on the left-wing hit parade throughout the 1960s, when it became the theme song of skyrocketing crime rates across the United States. And now the Golden Oldie is back, in the Golden State.

The tangible results of Prop 47 were both immediate and breathtaking. Within a year, there were some 14,000 fewer inmates in California's state prisons and local jails, just as the Proposition's backers had promised.

But the other half of their promise—improved public safety—somehow failed to materialize. In 2015:

  • Violent crime increased (above 2014 levels) in every one of California's 10 largest cities, while property crime increased in 9 of the 10.
  • Of 66 California cities whose crime trends were analyzed in depth, 49 saw their violent crime rates increase—usually by at least 10 percent.
  • Forty-eight of those same 66 California cities saw their property crime rates rise—and in half of those cases, the increase was 10 percent or greater. A typical case was San Francisco, where theft of merchandise from automobiles increased by 47 percent, auto theft rose by 17 percent, and robberies were up 23 percent.
  • The property crime rates for California cities as a whole increased, on average, by 116.9 offenses per 100,000 residents. By contrast, in states that hadn't passed Prop 47 or anything like it, the corresponding rates decreased by 29.6 offenses per 100,000 residents.
...

The New California Crime Wave
 
WAAAAAIT a minute.

What your stats are indicating is that arresting people for minor offenses....stops major offenses from ever happening.

That would mean....the cops look bad for doing it...but...the greater good is less major crime....basically the plot of Batman the Dark Knight where he has to do unpopular stuff and is willing to be disliked because the public needs him to even if they don't know it.

That would indicate Broken Windows Theory policing....reduces major crime.

That cannot be true.

You're racist.
 
They boast they're really doing something, and then all of a sudden, all hell breaks loose. And clean it up again. It's how law enforcement makes its living.
 
The error in thinking is that only low level offenders commit low level offenses. The poor sack caught with a lid is just a sack. In reality, its a killer, rapist, armed robber, who just happened to be caught with a lid, this time.
 
You couldn't pay me enough to live in that f/u state...
The New California Crime Wave
A criminal-justice “reform” measure unleashes thousands of predators.
February 29, 2016
John Perazzo
police_line_crime_scene_2498847226.jpg


Something amazing has happened in California. First, a brief background: Crime rates across the state, after a long period of steady decline, had reached fifty-year lows in 2014. Then, that November, a 60 percent majority of California voters—presumably incapable of accepting such good news without a measure of collective guilt—decided that it would be a really enlightened idea to pass Proposition 47, a ballot initiative bearing the cheery name “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act.” The purpose of this measure was to downgrade many types of drug possession and property crimes from felonies (punishable by more than a year in prison) to misdemeanors (which often entail no prison time at all). For the benefit of squeamish skeptics, the self-assured proponents of Prop 47 condescended to explain that these reduced penalties would not only alleviate prison overcrowding, but would also make California's streets safer by placing drug offenders into warm-and-fuzzy treatment and counseling programs, rather than into disagreeable prison cells. If you think this sounds like a familiar old tune, you're quite correct. It was #1 on the left-wing hit parade throughout the 1960s, when it became the theme song of skyrocketing crime rates across the United States. And now the Golden Oldie is back, in the Golden State.

The tangible results of Prop 47 were both immediate and breathtaking. Within a year, there were some 14,000 fewer inmates in California's state prisons and local jails, just as the Proposition's backers had promised.

But the other half of their promise—improved public safety—somehow failed to materialize. In 2015:

  • Violent crime increased (above 2014 levels) in every one of California's 10 largest cities, while property crime increased in 9 of the 10.
  • Of 66 California cities whose crime trends were analyzed in depth, 49 saw their violent crime rates increase—usually by at least 10 percent.
  • Forty-eight of those same 66 California cities saw their property crime rates rise—and in half of those cases, the increase was 10 percent or greater. A typical case was San Francisco, where theft of merchandise from automobiles increased by 47 percent, auto theft rose by 17 percent, and robberies were up 23 percent.
  • The property crime rates for California cities as a whole increased, on average, by 116.9 offenses per 100,000 residents. By contrast, in states that hadn't passed Prop 47 or anything like it, the corresponding rates decreased by 29.6 offenses per 100,000 residents.
...

The New California Crime Wave
What do you expect when Democrats release career felons from prison early and change dozens of felonies into misdemeanors.
 
You couldn't pay me enough to live in that f/u state...
The New California Crime Wave
A criminal-justice “reform” measure unleashes thousands of predators.
February 29, 2016
John Perazzo
police_line_crime_scene_2498847226.jpg


Something amazing has happened in California. First, a brief background: Crime rates across the state, after a long period of steady decline, had reached fifty-year lows in 2014. Then, that November, a 60 percent majority of California voters—presumably incapable of accepting such good news without a measure of collective guilt—decided that it would be a really enlightened idea to pass Proposition 47, a ballot initiative bearing the cheery name “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act.” The purpose of this measure was to downgrade many types of drug possession and property crimes from felonies (punishable by more than a year in prison) to misdemeanors (which often entail no prison time at all). For the benefit of squeamish skeptics, the self-assured proponents of Prop 47 condescended to explain that these reduced penalties would not only alleviate prison overcrowding, but would also make California's streets safer by placing drug offenders into warm-and-fuzzy treatment and counseling programs, rather than into disagreeable prison cells. If you think this sounds like a familiar old tune, you're quite correct. It was #1 on the left-wing hit parade throughout the 1960s, when it became the theme song of skyrocketing crime rates across the United States. And now the Golden Oldie is back, in the Golden State.

The tangible results of Prop 47 were both immediate and breathtaking. Within a year, there were some 14,000 fewer inmates in California's state prisons and local jails, just as the Proposition's backers had promised.

But the other half of their promise—improved public safety—somehow failed to materialize. In 2015:

  • Violent crime increased (above 2014 levels) in every one of California's 10 largest cities, while property crime increased in 9 of the 10.
  • Of 66 California cities whose crime trends were analyzed in depth, 49 saw their violent crime rates increase—usually by at least 10 percent.
  • Forty-eight of those same 66 California cities saw their property crime rates rise—and in half of those cases, the increase was 10 percent or greater. A typical case was San Francisco, where theft of merchandise from automobiles increased by 47 percent, auto theft rose by 17 percent, and robberies were up 23 percent.
  • The property crime rates for California cities as a whole increased, on average, by 116.9 offenses per 100,000 residents. By contrast, in states that hadn't passed Prop 47 or anything like it, the corresponding rates decreased by 29.6 offenses per 100,000 residents.
...

The New California Crime Wave
More gun control equals more crime
 
You couldn't pay me enough to live in that f/u state...
The New California Crime Wave
A criminal-justice “reform” measure unleashes thousands of predators.
February 29, 2016
John Perazzo
police_line_crime_scene_2498847226.jpg


Something amazing has happened in California. First, a brief background: Crime rates across the state, after a long period of steady decline, had reached fifty-year lows in 2014. Then, that November, a 60 percent majority of California voters—presumably incapable of accepting such good news without a measure of collective guilt—decided that it would be a really enlightened idea to pass Proposition 47, a ballot initiative bearing the cheery name “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act.” The purpose of this measure was to downgrade many types of drug possession and property crimes from felonies (punishable by more than a year in prison) to misdemeanors (which often entail no prison time at all). For the benefit of squeamish skeptics, the self-assured proponents of Prop 47 condescended to explain that these reduced penalties would not only alleviate prison overcrowding, but would also make California's streets safer by placing drug offenders into warm-and-fuzzy treatment and counseling programs, rather than into disagreeable prison cells. If you think this sounds like a familiar old tune, you're quite correct. It was #1 on the left-wing hit parade throughout the 1960s, when it became the theme song of skyrocketing crime rates across the United States. And now the Golden Oldie is back, in the Golden State.

The tangible results of Prop 47 were both immediate and breathtaking. Within a year, there were some 14,000 fewer inmates in California's state prisons and local jails, just as the Proposition's backers had promised.

But the other half of their promise—improved public safety—somehow failed to materialize. In 2015:

  • Violent crime increased (above 2014 levels) in every one of California's 10 largest cities, while property crime increased in 9 of the 10.
  • Of 66 California cities whose crime trends were analyzed in depth, 49 saw their violent crime rates increase—usually by at least 10 percent.
  • Forty-eight of those same 66 California cities saw their property crime rates rise—and in half of those cases, the increase was 10 percent or greater. A typical case was San Francisco, where theft of merchandise from automobiles increased by 47 percent, auto theft rose by 17 percent, and robberies were up 23 percent.
  • The property crime rates for California cities as a whole increased, on average, by 116.9 offenses per 100,000 residents. By contrast, in states that hadn't passed Prop 47 or anything like it, the corresponding rates decreased by 29.6 offenses per 100,000 residents.
...

The New California Crime Wave
What do you expect when Democrats release career felons from prison early and change dozens of felonies into misdemeanors.

They have to do something about prison overcrowding, and most people are strongly opposed to private prisons.

And they always have the three-strikes law.

Three-strikes law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In most jurisdictions, only crimes at the felony level qualify as serious offenses; however, misdemeanor offenses previously could qualify for application of the three-strikes law in California,
 
The genius of federalism is that each state, city, and county is a testing ground for new ideas, while other states, cities and counties can watch and see what works. This is much preferable to the federal government imposing "one size fits all" legislation that forces all states, cities and counties to adhere to the same ideas coming out of Washington.

http://thejerryperezexperiment.weeb...dvantages_and_disadvantages_of_federalism.pdf
 
They have to do something about prison overcrowding, and most people are strongly opposed to
The only thing the the Democrats won't spend tax dollars on - building more prisons.

Letting felons lose from prison just because someone claims they can't be kept prisoner is one of the dumbest positions in the history of mankind.

It depends on whether they are a violent felon or not. You make it sound like ANY felon should NEVER be released. Would you keep EVERY felon in jail for the rest of their lives?
 
They have to do something about prison overcrowding, and most people are strongly opposed to
The only thing the the Democrats won't spend tax dollars on - building more prisons.

Letting felons lose from prison just because someone claims they can't be kept prisoner is one of the dumbest positions in the history of mankind.

It depends on whether they are a violent felon or not. You make it sound like ANY felon should NEVER be released. Would you keep EVERY felon in jail for the rest of their lives?
Make better use of the death penalty.
 
They have to do something about prison overcrowding, and most people are strongly opposed to
The only thing the the Democrats won't spend tax dollars on - building more prisons.

Letting felons lose from prison just because someone claims they can't be kept prisoner is one of the dumbest positions in the history of mankind.

It depends on whether they are a violent felon or not. You make it sound like ANY felon should NEVER be released. Would you keep EVERY felon in jail for the rest of their lives?
Make better use of the death penalty.

Does that mean execution for crimes other than murder? Also, do you mean that every convicted murderer should be put to death even if there were extenuating circumstances or a doubt of guilt in many people's minds?
 
They have to do something about prison overcrowding, and most people are strongly opposed to
The only thing the the Democrats won't spend tax dollars on - building more prisons.

Letting felons lose from prison just because someone claims they can't be kept prisoner is one of the dumbest positions in the history of mankind.

It depends on whether they are a violent felon or not. You make it sound like ANY felon should NEVER be released. Would you keep EVERY felon in jail for the rest of their lives?
Violent crime is skyrocketing now that felons are being released before their sentence is finished.
Only a moron couldn't connect the dots.
 
They have to do something about prison overcrowding, and most people are strongly opposed to
The only thing the the Democrats won't spend tax dollars on - building more prisons.

Letting felons lose from prison just because someone claims they can't be kept prisoner is one of the dumbest positions in the history of mankind.

It depends on whether they are a violent felon or not. You make it sound like ANY felon should NEVER be released. Would you keep EVERY felon in jail for the rest of their lives?
Violent crime is skyrocketing now that felons are being released before their sentence is finished.
Only a moron couldn't connect the dots.

I would argue violent crime is flat like your brain.
 
They have to do something about prison overcrowding, and most people are strongly opposed to
The only thing the the Democrats won't spend tax dollars on - building more prisons.

Letting felons lose from prison just because someone claims they can't be kept prisoner is one of the dumbest positions in the history of mankind.

It depends on whether they are a violent felon or not. You make it sound like ANY felon should NEVER be released. Would you keep EVERY felon in jail for the rest of their lives?
Make better use of the death penalty.

Does that mean execution for crimes other than murder. Also, do you mean that every convicted murderer should be put to death even if their were extenuating circumstances or a doubt of guilt in many people's minds?
All felons should be put to death.
All felons should be released from prison.

The rise in California's crime rate has its roots in releasing violent offenders who just happen to have been arrested for a non violent crime. A habitual violent offender should never be released or put to death to free up room.
 
You couldn't pay me enough to live in that f/u state...
The New California Crime Wave
A criminal-justice “reform” measure unleashes thousands of predators.
February 29, 2016
John Perazzo
police_line_crime_scene_2498847226.jpg


Something amazing has happened in California. First, a brief background: Crime rates across the state, after a long period of steady decline, had reached fifty-year lows in 2014. Then, that November, a 60 percent majority of California voters—presumably incapable of accepting such good news without a measure of collective guilt—decided that it would be a really enlightened idea to pass Proposition 47, a ballot initiative bearing the cheery name “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act.” The purpose of this measure was to downgrade many types of drug possession and property crimes from felonies (punishable by more than a year in prison) to misdemeanors (which often entail no prison time at all). For the benefit of squeamish skeptics, the self-assured proponents of Prop 47 condescended to explain that these reduced penalties would not only alleviate prison overcrowding, but would also make California's streets safer by placing drug offenders into warm-and-fuzzy treatment and counseling programs, rather than into disagreeable prison cells. If you think this sounds like a familiar old tune, you're quite correct. It was #1 on the left-wing hit parade throughout the 1960s, when it became the theme song of skyrocketing crime rates across the United States. And now the Golden Oldie is back, in the Golden State.

The tangible results of Prop 47 were both immediate and breathtaking. Within a year, there were some 14,000 fewer inmates in California's state prisons and local jails, just as the Proposition's backers had promised.

But the other half of their promise—improved public safety—somehow failed to materialize. In 2015:

  • Violent crime increased (above 2014 levels) in every one of California's 10 largest cities, while property crime increased in 9 of the 10.
  • Of 66 California cities whose crime trends were analyzed in depth, 49 saw their violent crime rates increase—usually by at least 10 percent.
  • Forty-eight of those same 66 California cities saw their property crime rates rise—and in half of those cases, the increase was 10 percent or greater. A typical case was San Francisco, where theft of merchandise from automobiles increased by 47 percent, auto theft rose by 17 percent, and robberies were up 23 percent.
  • The property crime rates for California cities as a whole increased, on average, by 116.9 offenses per 100,000 residents. By contrast, in states that hadn't passed Prop 47 or anything like it, the corresponding rates decreased by 29.6 offenses per 100,000 residents.
...

The New California Crime Wave


This is part of the new plan to push for more gun control........as more Americans carry guns the crime rate was going down....I am not going to debate causation here...this is just a fact......as more Americans carry guns the crime rate went down....and that is a problem when you are pushing for gun control...if the crime rate is going down..you don't need to control guns...especially if more Americans own and carry them...

So as a gun grabber, what do you do? You need to increase the crime rate.......letting felons go...increases the crime rate......backing Black Lies Matter which intimidates police into not doing their job.....is increasing the crime rate....

Once you can get solid numbers showing crime going up....then your push for more gun control sounds more reasonable...

That was what Fast and Furious was all about....but people found out what they were doing.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top