California Court Kills AGW Case... Plaintiffs fail to show how they are harmed..

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Billy_Bob, Jul 31, 2018.

  1. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    14,326
    Thanks Received:
    2,932
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +13,445
    CASE DISMISSED – Federal Judge puts the final nail in the coffin of California’ ‘Global Warming Lawsuit’ against oil companies

    This is hilarious.... The plaintiffs fail to make a scientific case that shows causation of harm. They fail to rule out natural variation.. They fail to rule out OTHER COUNTRIES ACTIONS... Yet they are positive evil oil is the cause...

    They have no proof and they don't have a damn clue... They were given a judge with a brain who saw through the feel good crap and he slammed the door closed...

    CASE DISMISSED.
     
    • Winner Winner x 7
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  2. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    14,326
    Thanks Received:
    2,932
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +13,445
    This is just like the alarmists here... They don't have empirically observed evidence yet they scream "your hurting me" like a four year old....

    The order dismisses with prejudice... DOOR SLAMMED!


    But will they learn or just do more judge shopping?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    31,186
    Thanks Received:
    3,577
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +11,868
    Do these people ever win?:dunno:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    14,326
    Thanks Received:
    2,932
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +13,445
    :abgg2q.jpg::desk::haha:
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  5. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    14,326
    Thanks Received:
    2,932
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +13,445
    This Judge created a bit of case-law in doing what he did... Now courts around the US can follow suit, shutting down frivolous law suites right from the beginning.. Show me your proof of causation and consensus doesn't make the grade... You don't have it, no harm can be determined... case dismissed..

    I can see some very unhappy law suit junkies... The future of law suits like this one, is now very bleak..
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2018
  6. Missourian
    Offline

    Missourian Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    19,717
    Thanks Received:
    5,927
    Trophy Points:
    350
    Location:
    Missouri
    Ratings:
    +13,850
    But, but, but scientific consensus!?!? :rofl:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  7. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    14,326
    Thanks Received:
    2,932
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +13,445
    I was reading case notes and the "consensus" is considered hearsay.... Ooooooop's.... Got to have verifiable observed facts.... Pesky facts get in the way of a socialist power grab...
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. toobfreak
    Offline

    toobfreak Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    10,684
    Thanks Received:
    2,031
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +13,008

    Gee . . . . you'd think with all the climate EXPERTS on this board, at least ONE of them would have lent a hand in giving these po folks the clear, undeniable and irrefutable proof of man's evil! I mean, if you can't win a global warming case in California, well, that really SUCKS!
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2018
  9. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    14,326
    Thanks Received:
    2,932
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +13,445
    The court simply asked for evidence of causation and the ability to cross examine it.. The plaintiffs could not produce..

    They plead "the consensus says" and the judge ask them to bring them in as witnesses to be cross examined and for them to bring the facts supporting their claims.. They failed to produce even one of their 'consensus' people nor did they have supporting scientific evidence...

    No other way the judge could rule... Frivolous law suit dismissed with prejudice.. Guess who is now responsible for all court costs? The plaintiff... LMAO...
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  10. westwall
    Offline

    westwall Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    56,251
    Thanks Received:
    12,107
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +40,973



    We need one more decision like this to really put them out of business.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1

Share This Page