Calif Prop 63: Gun "control". You can't even buy ammo without a permit; and no high-cap magazines

[2aguy]

The Gun Grabbers won't stop till all Citizens are completely disarmed. That's the ultimate goal. Right now it's a slow 'Death by a thousand cuts' incremental approach. They're working towards making it virtually impossible for average Americans to acquire firearms.

They realize they can't implement a full ban on firearms. So they're doing it by way of incremental legislative actions. Every action will have to be aggressively challenged. That's the only way to fight the Gun Grabbers. You can't give them even an inch. You have to stand up to them. Period, end of story.

The absolute best way...vote them out of office...every single time....

 

[paulitician]

The Gun Grabbers won't stop till all Citizens are completely disarmed. That's the ultimate goal. Right now it's a slow 'Death by a thousand cuts' incremental approach. They're working towards making it virtually impossible for average Americans to acquire firearms.

They realize they can't implement a full ban on firearms. So they're doing it by way of incremental legislative actions. Every action will have to be aggressively challenged. That's the only way to fight the Gun Grabbers. You can't give them even an inch. You have to stand up to them. Period, end of story.

The absolute best way...vote them out of office...every single time....

Well that can't and won't happen. Every one of their actions has to be aggressively challenged in court. That's the only real way to preserve our 2nd Amendment right.

 

[Little-Acorn]

How About Banning Bullets? The Constitution Doesn't Say Anything About Those...
How About Banning Bullets? The Constitution Doesn't Say Anything About Those...

No lawyer is that idiotic. Only internet-forum liberal fanatics are.

 

[Little-Acorn]

As usual, liberals are carefully ignoring the best argument for the 2nd amendment.

If you eliminate all laws controlling firearms (as the 2nd requires), everyone would be allwed to carry... but most still wouldn't bother.

But a few would. So a criminal would know there's probably a few people in the crowd that are armed and know how to use their guns. And they wouldn't know which ones they were - the young man with a backpack, the old granny who was a victim of a home invasion 20 years ago and now never misses her practice at the range, etc. But the criminal can be pretty sure that when he mugs some woman for her purse or some man for his wallet, he'll probably get a bullet from an unknown direction, maybe more than one.

And so he'll thinks things over, and there's a pretty good chance he'll decide not to commit his crime at all. No all crooks will quit, but quite a few will.

There you go. Crime is reduced, and without a shot being fired.

It's the ideal solution. And the liberal fanatics hate it, and are trying every silly scheme they can think of to make sure it doesn't happen.

You have to wonder why.

 

[Little-Acorn]

The chance that you will need to defend yourself with a gun are awfully slim. You are far more likely to get struck by lightning

If everyone is allowed to carry, then the chance you would need to defend yourself becomes even more slim. Most people still wouldn't bother to carry, but a few would. And the crooks would know there's probably a few in the crowd... so often would decide not to commit his crime in the first place. There you go - a major reduction in crime, without a shot being fired.

What's strange is that when this is pointed out to gun-grabbing liberals, they flee the thread quickly... as they have with this one.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Obama and the left continually cites Australian statistics to prove gun control reduces gun deaths. What the lying pieces of shit never cite are the statistics in Australia that show although gun deaths have been reduced deaths by knives and other assorted instruments have risen dramatically to equal the former gun deaths.

As the old saying goes. "If there is a will there is a way". AKA some whacko wants to kill, they'll find the means to do it.

They also don't mention that the reason they really like Australian govt gun control, is that the Aussie govt practically banned ALL guns.

The Obama/Clinton regimes have been admiring them ever since, and hoping to emulate them here.

 

[2aguy]

Obama and the left continually cites Australian statistics to prove gun control reduces gun deaths. What the lying pieces of shit never cite are the statistics in Australia that show although gun deaths have been reduced deaths by knives and other assorted instruments have risen dramatically to equal the former gun deaths.

As the old saying goes. "If there is a will there is a way". AKA some whacko wants to kill, they'll find the means to do it.

They also don't mention that the reason they really like Australian govt gun control, is that the Aussie govt practically banned ALL guns.

The Obama/Clinton regimes have been admiring them ever since, and hoping to emulate them here.

They banned guns....and it failed......Melbourne, Australia is now called the "City of the Gun" because of all the illegal guns an gun violence...in a country that confiscated guns.....