CAIR Launches Website Exposing America's 'Islamophobia Network'

The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.

Blissfully ignorant? The word I would use is "complicit".

Add in the idiocy provided by their media where the witch hunt for "Islamophobes" takes precedence over protecting their children, and I would say there is plenty of blame to be spread around.
 
23itk68.jpg
 
No, Islam is a religion of 1.2 billion people. The vast majority don't hold to violent ideals. However, those that do, STILL number over 250 MILLION. That should give one pause. And I think CAIR itself is digging itself a hole. I would like to see their Islamophobe lists countered by lists of known Islamic terrorist organizations that one should not interact with.

They are too one sided for me.

Brigitte Gabriel addresses this point beautifully and her comments (in the video below) answered all the remaining questions I had about the moderate Muslims and how to regard them.

Watch.






Good video. Me thinks the SPLC will label her an extremist any day now.


LOLOL

Good one!

:D








Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.

By pressure do you mean blow-back from Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration? Any Muslim violence in France or England stems directly from Empire and so does the resulting Islamophobia.
Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5





No, I mean that the British population is going to rise up and kick them the hell out of the UK. And Islamic violence in France or the UK stems from the fact that they're there! The moderates are going to be swept up (unfortunately) along with the violent Islamists and sent packing. The Brits will take an awful, and for a long time. But when they see their government abandoning them to this sort of ideology, they will act.
 
Hate groups and sites should be challenged exposed, regardless of their target population.

Islam is a hate group of 1.2 billion members. Yet you seek to cover for it.

SPLC posts many of those same individuals on their site, along with what they've said and done to promote hatred. They do the same with racists and anti-semites such as David Duke, Michael Savage, Kevin MacDonald etc. etc. I don't think anyone regards those as "hit lists". The ADL, for example, maintains a watch on anti-semitism incidents and individuals promoting anti-semitism and related conspiracy theory crap. CAIR is doing nothing different than what these other groups do - lifting stones and exposing what lies underneath.

The SPLC is a hate group - no denying it. The SPLC may have a different target than the KKK, specifically Christians, Libertarians, Republicans, and anyone opposing the Obama agenda; but the methods used by the SPLC are virtually identical. The old KKK burned a cross on your lawn, the new KKK runs a hate campaign in the NY Times and lynches you on MSNBC.

So it makes perfect sense for those who brutally cut the heads off of people on YouTube to join forces with this anti-Christian hate group.






No, Islam is a religion of 1.2 billion people. The vast majority don't hold to violent ideals. However, those that do, STILL number over 250 MILLION. That should give one pause. And I think CAIR itself is digging itself a hole. I would like to see their Islamophobe lists countered by lists of known Islamic terrorist organizations that one should not interact with.

They are too one sided for me.

Brigitte Gabriel addresses this point beautifully and her comments (in the video below) answered all the remaining questions I had about the moderate Muslims and how to regard them.

Watch.




Brigitte is a lunatic. The Freeman Centre for Jewish Life at Duke University had to apologize for her gross generalizations of Arabs and Muslims.
 
Islam is a hate group of 1.2 billion members. Yet you seek to cover for it.

The SPLC is a hate group - no denying it. The SPLC may have a different target than the KKK, specifically Christians, Libertarians, Republicans, and anyone opposing the Obama agenda; but the methods used by the SPLC are virtually identical. The old KKK burned a cross on your lawn, the new KKK runs a hate campaign in the NY Times and lynches you on MSNBC.

So it makes perfect sense for those who brutally cut the heads off of people on YouTube to join forces with this anti-Christian hate group.






No, Islam is a religion of 1.2 billion people. The vast majority don't hold to violent ideals. However, those that do, STILL number over 250 MILLION. That should give one pause. And I think CAIR itself is digging itself a hole. I would like to see their Islamophobe lists countered by lists of known Islamic terrorist organizations that one should not interact with.

They are too one sided for me.

Brigitte Gabriel addresses this point beautifully and her comments (in the video below) answered all the remaining questions I had about the moderate Muslims and how to regard them.

Watch.






Good video. Me thinks the SPLC will label her an extremist any day now.


LOLOL

Good one!

:D








Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.


From the BBC. Pay attention to the point raised at 3:24 in the documentary.

 
That's defining something, but that's not exactly answering the claim "moderate Muslims believe in the VERY SAME things as extremist Muslims"

Can a person call themselves a Christian if they don't believe in the divinity of Christ, if they don't believe in his resurrection, if they don't believe he even existed? To be a Christian, whether barely Christian or fully Christian, one must believe in a set of core tenets.

The same applies to Islam. Death for apostates is a core belief, hence none of the sects, the schools of jurisprudence, deviates from that position.
 
No, Islam is a religion of 1.2 billion people. The vast majority don't hold to violent ideals. However, those that do, STILL number over 250 MILLION. That should give one pause. And I think CAIR itself is digging itself a hole. I would like to see their Islamophobe lists countered by lists of known Islamic terrorist organizations that one should not interact with.

They are too one sided for me.

Brigitte Gabriel addresses this point beautifully and her comments (in the video below) answered all the remaining questions I had about the moderate Muslims and how to regard them.

Watch.






Good video. Me thinks the SPLC will label her an extremist any day now.


LOLOL

Good one!

:D








Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.


From the BBC. Pay attention to the point raised at 3:24 in the documentary.







Yeah, there is too much "colored" vs white rhetoric here. The problem with Islam is religious. They are engaging in a religious war with the west and the people need to wake up and recognize that fact.
 
No, Islam is a religion of 1.2 billion people. The vast majority don't hold to violent ideals. However, those that do, STILL number over 250 MILLION. That should give one pause. And I think CAIR itself is digging itself a hole. I would like to see their Islamophobe lists countered by lists of known Islamic terrorist organizations that one should not interact with.

They are too one sided for me.

Brigitte Gabriel addresses this point beautifully and her comments (in the video below) answered all the remaining questions I had about the moderate Muslims and how to regard them.

Watch.






Good video. Me thinks the SPLC will label her an extremist any day now.


LOLOL

Good one!

:D








Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.

By pressure do you mean blow-back from Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration? Any Muslim violence in France or England stems directly from Empire and so does the resulting Islamophobia.
Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5


What did Spain have to do with that?

The 2004 Madrid train bombings (also known in Spain as 11-M) were nearly simultaneous, coordinated bombings against the Cercanías commuter train system of Madrid, Spain, on the morning of 11 March 2004 – three days before Spain's general elections and two and a half years after the September 11 attacks in the United States. The explosions killed 191 people and wounded 1,800.​
 
Yeah, there is too much "colored" vs white rhetoric here. The problem with Islam is religious. They are engaging in a religious war with the west and the people need to wake up and recognize that fact.

The point is that the British people were never asked, this was imposed upon them by the Labour Party. No political campaign took place where the proposition was put to people "We want to erase British Culture and replace it with multiculturalism. We want to import Muslims and blacks and then pass the Race Relations Acts which will strip you of freedoms in order to privilege Muslims and blacks.

Yeah, people were upset then and they're very upset now.
 
Yeah, there is too much "colored" vs white rhetoric here. The problem with Islam is religious. They are engaging in a religious war with the west and the people need to wake up and recognize that fact.

The point is that the British people were never asked, this was imposed upon them by the Labour Party. No political campaign took place where the proposition was put to people "We want to erase British Culture and replace it with multiculturalism. We want to import Muslims and blacks and then pass the Race Relations Acts which will strip you of freedoms in order to privilege Muslims and blacks.

Yeah, people were upset then and they're very upset now.





Governments (especially socialistic ones) don't ask for the peoples input. They don't care about the people except in how to use them most effectively to benefit the State.
 
Brigitte Gabriel addresses this point beautifully and her comments (in the video below) answered all the remaining questions I had about the moderate Muslims and how to regard them.

Watch.






Good video. Me thinks the SPLC will label her an extremist any day now.


LOLOL

Good one!

:D








Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.

By pressure do you mean blow-back from Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration? Any Muslim violence in France or England stems directly from Empire and so does the resulting Islamophobia.
Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5





No, I mean that the British population is going to rise up and kick them the hell out of the UK. And Islamic violence in France or the UK stems from the fact that they're there! The moderates are going to be swept up (unfortunately) along with the violent Islamists and sent packing. The Brits will take an awful, and for a long time. But when they see their government abandoning them to this sort of ideology, they will act.

I know you are aware of Sykes-Picot and the spheres of influence it established in the Muslim world; the British and French populations are about to reap to blow-back from crimes their elites sowed in 1916.

"The Sykes–Picot Agreement, officially known as the Asia Minor Agreement, was a secret agreement between the governments of the United Kingdom and France,[1] with the assent of Russia, defining their proposedspheres of influence and control in theMiddle East should the Triple Ententesucceed in defeating the Ottoman Empireduring World War I. The negotiation of the treaty occurred between November 1915 and March 1916.[2] The agreement was concluded on 16 May 1916.[3]"

Sykes Picot Agreement - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 
Good video. Me thinks the SPLC will label her an extremist any day now.

LOLOL

Good one!

:D








Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.

By pressure do you mean blow-back from Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration? Any Muslim violence in France or England stems directly from Empire and so does the resulting Islamophobia.
Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5





No, I mean that the British population is going to rise up and kick them the hell out of the UK. And Islamic violence in France or the UK stems from the fact that they're there! The moderates are going to be swept up (unfortunately) along with the violent Islamists and sent packing. The Brits will take an awful, and for a long time. But when they see their government abandoning them to this sort of ideology, they will act.

I know you are aware of Sykes-Picot and the spheres of influence it established in the Muslim world; the British and French populations are about to reap to blow-back from crimes their elites sowed in 1916.

"The Sykes–Picot Agreement, officially known as the Asia Minor Agreement, was a secret agreement between the governments of the United Kingdom and France,[1] with the assent of Russia, defining their proposedspheres of influence and control in theMiddle East should the Triple Ententesucceed in defeating the Ottoman Empireduring World War I. The negotiation of the treaty occurred between November 1915 and March 1916.[2] The agreement was concluded on 16 May 1916.[3]"

Sykes Picot Agreement - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia






Oh please. This has nothing to do with the current state of affairs. The Ottoman Empire was semi effective at keeping Islamic extremists under control (they simply killed them) and the end of WWI witnessed the end of that control. Since then the Islamists have been growing and developing their base so that they can launch their assault on western civilization.

Go back through history and you see these people have always existed. Some governments were adept at controlling them. Hulegu most famously destroyed the Assassins in Alamut, and then destroyed the very Caliphate that the ISIL asshats wish to reform. From that point on it has been ebb and flow with the Islamists.
 
Brigitte Gabriel addresses this point beautifully and her comments (in the video below) answered all the remaining questions I had about the moderate Muslims and how to regard them.

Watch.






Good video. Me thinks the SPLC will label her an extremist any day now.


LOLOL

Good one!

:D








Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.

By pressure do you mean blow-back from Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration? Any Muslim violence in France or England stems directly from Empire and so does the resulting Islamophobia.
Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5


What did Spain have to do with that?

The 2004 Madrid train bombings (also known in Spain as 11-M) were nearly simultaneous, coordinated bombings against the Cercanías commuter train system of Madrid, Spain, on the morning of 11 March 2004 – three days before Spain's general elections and two and a half years after the September 11 attacks in the United States. The explosions killed 191 people and wounded 1,800.​

"The bombings occurred three days before general elections in which incumbent José María Aznar's PP was defeated.[10] Immediately after the bombing, leaders of the PP claimed evidence indicating the Basque separatist organization, ETA (Euskadi Ta Askatasuna) was responsible for the bombings,[verification needed][11][12] while Islamist responsibility would have had the opposite effect,[verification needed] as it would have been seen as a consequence of the PP government taking Spain into the Iraq War, a policy extremely unpopular with Spaniards.[13]

Maybe it's the fault of rich Spaniards who supported the US war of aggression against Iraq?

2004 Madrid train bombings - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 
LOLOL

Good one!

:D








Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.

By pressure do you mean blow-back from Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration? Any Muslim violence in France or England stems directly from Empire and so does the resulting Islamophobia.
Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5





No, I mean that the British population is going to rise up and kick them the hell out of the UK. And Islamic violence in France or the UK stems from the fact that they're there! The moderates are going to be swept up (unfortunately) along with the violent Islamists and sent packing. The Brits will take an awful, and for a long time. But when they see their government abandoning them to this sort of ideology, they will act.

I know you are aware of Sykes-Picot and the spheres of influence it established in the Muslim world; the British and French populations are about to reap to blow-back from crimes their elites sowed in 1916.

"The Sykes–Picot Agreement, officially known as the Asia Minor Agreement, was a secret agreement between the governments of the United Kingdom and France,[1] with the assent of Russia, defining their proposedspheres of influence and control in theMiddle East should the Triple Ententesucceed in defeating the Ottoman Empireduring World War I. The negotiation of the treaty occurred between November 1915 and March 1916.[2] The agreement was concluded on 16 May 1916.[3]"

Sykes Picot Agreement - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia






Oh please. This has nothing to do with the current state of affairs. The Ottoman Empire was semi effective at keeping Islamic extremists under control (they simply killed them) and the end of WWI witnessed the end of that control. Since then the Islamists have been growing and developing their base so that they can launch their assault on western civilization.

Go back through history and you see these people have always existed. Some governments were adept at controlling them. Hulegu most famously destroyed the Assassins in Alamut, and then destroyed the very Caliphate that the ISIL asshats wish to reform. From that point on it has been ebb and flow with the Islamists.

The history I see points to a clash of empires and not civilizations driving the anti-Muslim crusades like the one launched by the US in 2003.

Economics explains why the west has meddled in the Middle East for decades, and now that meddling is blowing back on innocent Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

"...It's completely about a clash of economic interests.

"It's about the leaders, the political leaders in Europe versus the political leaders in the Middle East and so forth duking it out for power.

And the fact of the matter is that these leaders were not always against each other as well, because even in the context of the Crusades, you see alliances being made between the Crusader kings and the Muslim kings and people betraying each other for political gain, for economic gain.

"So there's--the idea that somehow Muslims and Christians have always been at loggerheads with each other is simply not borne out."

Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5
 
Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.
By pressure do you mean blow-back from Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration? Any Muslim violence in France or England stems directly from Empire and so does the resulting Islamophobia.
Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5




No, I mean that the British population is going to rise up and kick them the hell out of the UK. And Islamic violence in France or the UK stems from the fact that they're there! The moderates are going to be swept up (unfortunately) along with the violent Islamists and sent packing. The Brits will take an awful, and for a long time. But when they see their government abandoning them to this sort of ideology, they will act.
I know you are aware of Sykes-Picot and the spheres of influence it established in the Muslim world; the British and French populations are about to reap to blow-back from crimes their elites sowed in 1916.

"The Sykes–Picot Agreement, officially known as the Asia Minor Agreement, was a secret agreement between the governments of the United Kingdom and France,[1] with the assent of Russia, defining their proposedspheres of influence and control in theMiddle East should the Triple Ententesucceed in defeating the Ottoman Empireduring World War I. The negotiation of the treaty occurred between November 1915 and March 1916.[2] The agreement was concluded on 16 May 1916.[3]"

Sykes Picot Agreement - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia





Oh please. This has nothing to do with the current state of affairs. The Ottoman Empire was semi effective at keeping Islamic extremists under control (they simply killed them) and the end of WWI witnessed the end of that control. Since then the Islamists have been growing and developing their base so that they can launch their assault on western civilization.

Go back through history and you see these people have always existed. Some governments were adept at controlling them. Hulegu most famously destroyed the Assassins in Alamut, and then destroyed the very Caliphate that the ISIL asshats wish to reform. From that point on it has been ebb and flow with the Islamists.
The history I see points to a clash of empires and not civilizations driving the anti-Muslim crusades like the one launched by the US in 2003.

Economics explains why the west has meddled in the Middle East for decades, and now that meddling is blowing back on innocent Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

"...It's completely about a clash of economic interests.

"It's about the leaders, the political leaders in Europe versus the political leaders in the Middle East and so forth duking it out for power.

And the fact of the matter is that these leaders were not always against each other as well, because even in the context of the Crusades, you see alliances being made between the Crusader kings and the Muslim kings and people betraying each other for political gain, for economic gain.

"So there's--the idea that somehow Muslims and Christians have always been at loggerheads with each other is simply not borne out."

Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5




You are myopic like all progressives. What is beyond the end of your nose is invisible. These people don't have the beliefs you do. They don't care about you, or anyone else. They care about their even more myopic view of the world that has not changed in the last 1000 years.
 
By pressure do you mean blow-back from Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration? Any Muslim violence in France or England stems directly from Empire and so does the resulting Islamophobia.
Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5




No, I mean that the British population is going to rise up and kick them the hell out of the UK. And Islamic violence in France or the UK stems from the fact that they're there! The moderates are going to be swept up (unfortunately) along with the violent Islamists and sent packing. The Brits will take an awful, and for a long time. But when they see their government abandoning them to this sort of ideology, they will act.
I know you are aware of Sykes-Picot and the spheres of influence it established in the Muslim world; the British and French populations are about to reap to blow-back from crimes their elites sowed in 1916.

"The Sykes–Picot Agreement, officially known as the Asia Minor Agreement, was a secret agreement between the governments of the United Kingdom and France,[1] with the assent of Russia, defining their proposedspheres of influence and control in theMiddle East should the Triple Ententesucceed in defeating the Ottoman Empireduring World War I. The negotiation of the treaty occurred between November 1915 and March 1916.[2] The agreement was concluded on 16 May 1916.[3]"

Sykes Picot Agreement - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia





Oh please. This has nothing to do with the current state of affairs. The Ottoman Empire was semi effective at keeping Islamic extremists under control (they simply killed them) and the end of WWI witnessed the end of that control. Since then the Islamists have been growing and developing their base so that they can launch their assault on western civilization.

Go back through history and you see these people have always existed. Some governments were adept at controlling them. Hulegu most famously destroyed the Assassins in Alamut, and then destroyed the very Caliphate that the ISIL asshats wish to reform. From that point on it has been ebb and flow with the Islamists.
The history I see points to a clash of empires and not civilizations driving the anti-Muslim crusades like the one launched by the US in 2003.

Economics explains why the west has meddled in the Middle East for decades, and now that meddling is blowing back on innocent Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

"...It's completely about a clash of economic interests.

"It's about the leaders, the political leaders in Europe versus the political leaders in the Middle East and so forth duking it out for power.

And the fact of the matter is that these leaders were not always against each other as well, because even in the context of the Crusades, you see alliances being made between the Crusader kings and the Muslim kings and people betraying each other for political gain, for economic gain.

"So there's--the idea that somehow Muslims and Christians have always been at loggerheads with each other is simply not borne out."

Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire - Deepa Kumar on Reality Asserts Itself 3 5




You are myopic like all progressives. What is beyond the end of your nose is invisible. These people don't have the beliefs you do. They don't care about you, or anyone else. They care about their even more myopic view of the world that has not changed in the last 1000 years.
They care about empires who maim, murder, and displace millions of civilians for O-I-L; wouldn't you? If the west wants peace, more killing for money won't help.
 
They are no different than the ADL, for example, .

Bullshit . For starters, the ADL protects an ethnic minority from persecution. C.A.I.R. is all about enforcing the dictates of a totalitarian political ideology.

Really now?

Yes. Really now.

Secondly, the ADL does not provide hit lists of people who have a death threat over their heads from their fellow Jews.
I shouldn't even have to mention that fact that the adl does not funnel money to known genocidal terrorist organizations.

Neither does CAIR. They simply provide a list of hate sites, groups, and individuals who have promoted bigotry.

Are you in the Muslim Brotherhood?

No. I'm stealth Islamist Jihadi. If you are going to invent labels, please try to keep them straight. :)

Many a true word was spoken in jest.

I have no doubt you are a real life Jihadi.


This is your Jihad.

Of the pen.

Toward the ultimate goal of global conquest in Allah's name.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

What matters in life is this: truth, justice, equality, compassion and empathy.

Not you. Not the thousands of hateful Pamela Gelars out there trying to foment something Hitler would approve of.
 
Last edited:
Islam is a hate group of 1.2 billion members. Yet you seek to cover for it.

The SPLC is a hate group - no denying it. The SPLC may have a different target than the KKK, specifically Christians, Libertarians, Republicans, and anyone opposing the Obama agenda; but the methods used by the SPLC are virtually identical. The old KKK burned a cross on your lawn, the new KKK runs a hate campaign in the NY Times and lynches you on MSNBC.

So it makes perfect sense for those who brutally cut the heads off of people on YouTube to join forces with this anti-Christian hate group.






No, Islam is a religion of 1.2 billion people. The vast majority don't hold to violent ideals. However, those that do, STILL number over 250 MILLION. That should give one pause. And I think CAIR itself is digging itself a hole. I would like to see their Islamophobe lists countered by lists of known Islamic terrorist organizations that one should not interact with.

They are too one sided for me.

Brigitte Gabriel addresses this point beautifully and her comments (in the video below) answered all the remaining questions I had about the moderate Muslims and how to regard them.

Watch.






Good video. Me thinks the SPLC will label her an extremist any day now.


LOLOL

Good one!

:D








Good for her. I have a feeling that there are going to be some very violent outbursts in the UK and that the Muslims are going to be sent home.....those that survive. I have quite a few friends in the UK and they are getting fed up with it. The UK government is blissfully ignorant and the pressure is building.



Well damn. Muslims are Brits too.

Brigitte Gabriel - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top